Mintzer Scott, Maio Vittorio, Foley Kathleen
Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, USA.
School of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 May;34:105-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
The extent to which enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) are used as first-line treatment in the United States remains unknown. Studies suggest that EIAEDs produce elevation of serum lipids, which could require additional treatment. We assessed the current use of EIAED in monotherapy for epilepsy in the U.S., as well as the correlation between the use of EIAEDs and subsequent new prescriptions for HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors ("statins") for hyperlipidemia.
We queried the MarketScan databases between July 2009 and January 2013, covering 66 million patients with commercial or supplemental Medicare insurance. We identified individuals who had a diagnosis of seizures, continuous enrollment in the database from 6months prior to 24 months after the epilepsy diagnosis, no utilization of an AED or a statin prior to that diagnosis, and at least 1 new AED prescription. We tabulated the fraction of subjects who were prescribed EIAEDs (phenytoin, carbamazepine, or barbiturates) and those prescribed all other AEDs. Rates of new statin prescription between 1 and 24months after AED prescription were assessed among the two groups, restricted to those with no prior history of vascular disease who had lipid serology obtained subsequent to the new AED prescription.
Of the 11,893 patients with newly treated epilepsy, 2425 (20.4%) were started on an EIAED, and 9468 (79.6%) were started on a noninducing AED. There was a consistent and significant trend for EIAEDs to be increasingly prescribed with increasing age (p<0.0001). Among patients meeting the criteria, 66 (13.3%) of 496 EIAED-treated patients and 178 (9.2%) of 1930 noninducing AED patients were newly prescribed a statin (p<0.007). This difference remained significant after accounting for age and gender (p=0.015). A patient who was started on an EIAED was 46% more likely to be subsequently prescribed a statin than a patient who was started on a noninducing AED (95% CI=1.08-1.98).
Enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drug prescription for epilepsy appears to increase with increasing age in the U.S. despite the absence of a cogent rationale for this practice, suggesting a failure to appreciate the complications of EIAED therapy among U.S. physicians. Statins were more often prescribed to those newly treated with EIAEDs compared with those given noninducing AEDs. These preliminary data provide further evidence suggesting that EIAEDs elevate lipids in a clinically meaningful manner.
在美国,酶诱导型抗癫痫药物(EIAEDs)作为一线治疗药物的使用程度尚不清楚。研究表明,EIAEDs会导致血清脂质升高,这可能需要额外的治疗。我们评估了美国EIAEDs在癫痫单药治疗中的当前使用情况,以及EIAEDs的使用与随后用于高脂血症的HMG-CoA还原酶抑制剂(“他汀类药物”)新处方之间的相关性。
我们查询了2009年7月至2013年1月期间的MarketScan数据库,涵盖6600万商业或补充医疗保险患者。我们确定了那些被诊断为癫痫发作、在癫痫诊断前6个月至诊断后24个月期间持续纳入数据库、在该诊断之前未使用过抗癫痫药物(AED)或他汀类药物且至少有1张新的AED处方的个体。我们将开具EIAEDs(苯妥英、卡马西平或巴比妥类药物)的受试者比例和开具所有其他AEDs的受试者比例制成表格。在两组中评估AED处方后1至24个月内新的他汀类药物处方率,仅限于那些无血管疾病既往史且在新的AED处方后进行了血脂血清学检测的患者。
在11893例新治疗癫痫患者中,2425例(20.4%)开始使用EIAEDs,9468例(79.6%)开始使用非诱导型AEDs。随着年龄增长,EIAEDs的处方量呈持续且显著的上升趋势(p<0.0001)。在符合标准的患者中,496例接受EIAED治疗的患者中有66例(13.3%)和1930例非诱导型AED患者中有178例(9.2%)新开具了他汀类药物(p<0.007)。在考虑年龄和性别因素后,这种差异仍然显著(p=0.015)。开始使用EIAED的患者随后开具他汀类药物的可能性比开始使用非诱导型AED的患者高46%(95%CI=1.08-1.98)。
在美国,尽管这种做法缺乏令人信服的理论依据,但癫痫的酶诱导型抗癫痫药物处方似乎随着年龄增长而增加,这表明美国医生未能认识到EIAED治疗的并发症。与使用非诱导型AED的患者相比,使用EIAEDs新治疗的患者更常开具他汀类药物。这些初步数据提供了进一步的证据,表明EIAEDs以具有临床意义的方式升高血脂。