Kalilani Linda, Lu Chao, Pierre-Louis Bosny, Gold Michael
UCB Pharma, 8010 Arco Corporate Drive, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Jul;72:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 May 30.
Information on the use of lacosamide and concomitant antiepileptic and non-antiepileptic drugs (non-AEDs) is available from clinical trials and observational studies with small sample sizes. This retrospective cohort study was conducted to gain insight into the use of lacosamide in a large number of patients with epilepsy in real-life clinical practice with less restrictive selection criteria compared with clinical trial participants. The Truven Health MarketScan (Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental) database was used to identify patients with a prior diagnosis of epilepsy with at least one prescription claim for lacosamide between June 2009 and September 2013 and continuous health insurance enrolment with medical and pharmacy coverage during the 1-year pre-index baseline period. A total of 8859 eligible patients were identified, of whom, at index (lacosamide initiation), 16.8% received lacosamide as monotherapy and 54.0% as polytherapy. The median prescription duration was 196days (Interquartile range 69-476days). Levetiracetam was the most frequently prescribed concomitant AED across all age groups, followed by phenytoin among older (>65years) and lamotrigine among younger patients. Older patients who had LCM monotherapy at initiation, were prescribed fewer concomitant AEDs, but more non-AEDs. The most common non-AED medications were prescribed for pain, psychiatric conditions, hyperlipidemia and gastrointestinal diseases across all age groups. Overall, results suggest that the lacosamide use is driven predominantly by age and that there is substantial use of lacosamide monotherapy (16.8%), despite lack of indication at the time of the study. Results also reveal substantial use of concomitant non-AEDs; 90.4% among patients >65years of age and 54.3% among those ≤17years, confirming the high prevalence of comorbidities among patients with epilepsy across all ages. Despite the availability of numerous newer AEDs, older AEDs are still being frequently prescribed, especially for elderly patients, notably phenytoin. This warrants careful consideration, given the strong propensity of enzyme-inducing AEDs to interact with other drugs, producing unwanted side effects. These results highlight the value of real-life prescription patterns and the potential in informing treatment decisions to ensure patients receive appropriate treatment.
关于拉科酰胺与抗癫痫药物及非抗癫痫药物(非AEDs)联合使用的信息来自样本量较小的临床试验和观察性研究。本回顾性队列研究旨在深入了解在实际临床实践中,与临床试验参与者相比,选择标准限制较少的大量癫痫患者使用拉科酰胺的情况。使用Truven Health MarketScan(商业保险理赔和医疗保险补充)数据库,识别在2009年6月至2013年9月期间有癫痫既往诊断且至少有一张拉科酰胺处方理赔记录,并在索引前1年基线期连续参加有医疗和药房保险的患者。共识别出8859名符合条件的患者,其中在索引时(开始使用拉科酰胺),16.8%的患者接受拉科酰胺单药治疗,54.0%接受联合治疗。中位处方持续时间为196天(四分位间距69 - 476天)。左乙拉西坦是所有年龄组中最常开具的联合使用的抗癫痫药物,其次是老年患者(>65岁)中的苯妥英和年轻患者中的拉莫三嗪。初始使用拉科酰胺单药治疗的老年患者,联合使用的抗癫痫药物较少,但使用的非抗癫痫药物较多。所有年龄组中,最常见的非抗癫痫药物用于治疗疼痛、精神疾病、高脂血症和胃肠道疾病。总体而言,结果表明拉科酰胺的使用主要受年龄驱动,尽管在研究时缺乏相应适应证,但仍有大量患者使用拉科酰胺单药治疗(16.8%)。结果还显示联合使用非抗癫痫药物的情况也很普遍;65岁以上患者中为90.