Suppr超能文献

颈动脉双功超声诊断标准的机构差异导致颈动脉狭窄分类存在显著差异,并可能导致治疗差异。

Institutional differences in carotid artery duplex diagnostic criteria result in significant variability in classification of carotid artery stenoses and likely lead to disparities in care.

作者信息

Arous Edward J, Baril Donald T, Robinson William P, Aiello Francesco A, Hevelone Nathanael D, Arous Elias J, Messina Louis M, Schanzer Andres

机构信息

From the Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA (Edward J. Arous, W.P.R., F.A.A., Elias J. Arous, L.M.M., A.S.); Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA (D.T.B.); and Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (N.D.H.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 May;7(3):423-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000855. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The indications for carotid revascularization are based almost exclusively on the results of carotid duplex ultrasonography. Noninvasive vascular laboratories show large variation in the diagnostic criteria used to classify degree of carotid artery stenosis. We hypothesize that variability of these diagnostic criteria causes significant variation in stenosis classification directly affecting the number of revascularizations and associated costs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The diagnostic criteria to interpret carotid duplex ultrasounds were obtained from 10 New England institutions. All carotid duplex scans performed at our institution were reviewed from 2008 to 2012. Using the diagnostic criteria from each institution, the degree of stenosis that would have been reported was classified as 70% to 99% asymptomatic, 80% to 99% asymptomatic, and 50% to 99% symptomatic. We then calculated the theoretical number of carotid revascularization procedures that this cohort would be offered using each institution's diagnostic criteria and the costs of these procedures based on reimbursement rates. Among 10 614 patients who underwent 15 534 carotid duplex scans, 31 025 arteries were reviewed. Application of the 10 institutions' criteria to the patients from our institution yielded marked variation in the number classified as 70% to 99% asymptomatic (range, 186-2201), 80% to 99% asymptomatic (range, 78-426), and 50% to 99% symptomatic (range, 157-781). If revascularizations were based on these results, costs would range from $2.2 to $26 million, $0.9 to $5.0 million, and $1.9 to $9.2 million, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in diagnostic criteria to interpret carotid ultrasound result in significant variation in classification of carotid artery stenosis, likely leading to differences in the number and subsequent costs of revascularizations. This theoretical model highlights the need for standardization of carotid duplex criteria.

摘要

背景

颈动脉血运重建的指征几乎完全基于颈动脉双功超声检查的结果。非侵入性血管实验室在用于对颈动脉狭窄程度进行分类的诊断标准方面存在很大差异。我们推测,这些诊断标准的变异性会导致狭窄分类的显著差异,直接影响血运重建的数量及相关费用。

方法与结果

从新英格兰的10家机构获取了解读颈动脉双功超声的诊断标准。对2008年至2012年在我们机构进行的所有颈动脉双功扫描进行了回顾。使用每家机构的诊断标准,将报告的狭窄程度分类为70%至99%无症状、80%至99%无症状以及50%至99%有症状。然后,我们根据每家机构的诊断标准计算了该队列将接受的颈动脉血运重建手术的理论数量,以及基于报销率的这些手术的费用。在接受了15534次颈动脉双功扫描的10614例患者中,对31025条动脉进行了评估。将这10家机构的标准应用于我们机构的患者,得出分类为70%至99%无症状(范围为186 - 2201)、80%至99%无症状(范围为78 - 426)以及50%至99%有症状(范围为157 - 781)的数量存在显著差异。如果基于这些结果进行血运重建,费用分别为220万美元至2600万美元、90万美元至500万美元以及190万美元至920万美元。

结论

解读颈动脉超声的诊断标准差异导致颈动脉狭窄分类存在显著差异,可能导致血运重建数量及后续费用的差异。这个理论模型凸显了标准化颈动脉双功标准的必要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验