Suppr超能文献

无症状性颈动脉狭窄术前影像学检查、颈动脉双功超声标准及手术阈值的全国性差异。

National variation in preoperative imaging, carotid duplex ultrasound criteria, and threshold for surgery for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

作者信息

Arous Edward J, Simons Jessica P, Flahive Julie M, Beck Adam W, Stone David H, Hoel Andrew W, Messina Louis M, Schanzer Andres

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Quantitative Health Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Mass.

University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Fla.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2015 Oct;62(4):937-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.438. Epub 2015 Jun 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is among the most common procedures performed in the United States. However, consensus is lacking regarding optimal preoperative imaging, carotid duplex ultrasound criteria, and ultimately, the threshold for surgery. We sought to characterize national variation in preoperative imaging, carotid duplex ultrasound criteria, and threshold for surgery for asymptomatic CEA.

METHODS

The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database was used to identify all CEA procedures performed for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis between 2003 and 2014. VQI currently captures 100% of CEA procedures performed at >300 centers by >2000 physicians nationwide. Three analyses were performed to quantify the variation in (1) preoperative imaging, (2) carotid duplex ultrasound criteria, and (3) threshold for surgery.

RESULTS

Of 35,695 CEA procedures in 33,488 patients, the study cohort was limited to 19,610 CEA procedures (55%) performed for asymptomatic disease. The preoperative imaging modality used before CEA varied widely, with 57% of patients receiving a single preoperative imaging study (duplex ultrasound imaging, 46%; computed tomography angiography, 7.5%; magnetic resonance angiography, 2.0%; cerebral angiography, 1.3%) and 43% of patients receiving multiple preoperative imaging studies. Of the 16,452 asymptomatic patients (89%) who underwent preoperative duplex ultrasound imaging, there was significant variability between centers in the degree of stenosis (50%-69%, 70%-79%, 80%-99%) designated for a given peak systolic velocity, end diastolic velocity, and internal carotid artery-to-common carotid artery ratio. Although 68% of CEA procedures in asymptomatic patients were performed for an 80% to 99% stenosis, 26% were performed for a 70% to 79% stenosis, and 4.1% were performed for a 50% to 69% stenosis. At the surgeon level, the range in the percentage of CEA procedures performed for a <80% asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is from 0% to 100%. Similarly, at the center level, institutions range in the percentage of CEA procedures performed for a <80% asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis from 0% to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite CEA being an extremely common procedure, there is widespread variation in the three primary determinants-preoperative imaging, carotid duplex ultrasound criteria, and threshold for surgery-of whether CEA is performed for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Standardizing the approach to care for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis will mitigate the significant downstream effects of this variation on health care costs.

摘要

目的

在美国,针对无症状性颈动脉狭窄进行的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)是最常见的手术之一。然而,在最佳术前影像学检查、颈动脉双功超声标准以及最终的手术阈值方面,目前尚未达成共识。我们旨在描述无症状性CEA术前影像学检查、颈动脉双功超声标准以及手术阈值的全国性差异。

方法

利用血管外科学会血管质量倡议(VQI)数据库,识别2003年至2014年间因无症状性颈动脉狭窄而进行的所有CEA手术。VQI目前涵盖了全国2000多名医生在300多个中心进行的100%的CEA手术。进行了三项分析,以量化(1)术前影像学检查、(2)颈动脉双功超声标准和(3)手术阈值方面的差异。

结果

在33488例患者的35695例CEA手术中,研究队列仅限于因无症状性疾病而进行的19610例CEA手术(55%)。CEA术前使用的影像学检查方式差异很大,57%的患者接受了单项术前影像学检查(双功超声成像,46%;计算机断层血管造影,7.5%;磁共振血管造影,2.0%;脑血管造影,1.3%),43%的患者接受了多项术前影像学检查。在16452例(89%)接受术前双功超声成像的无症状患者中,各中心对于给定的收缩期峰值流速、舒张末期流速以及颈内动脉与颈总动脉比值所指定的狭窄程度(50%-69%、70%-79%、80%-99%)存在显著差异。尽管无症状患者中68%的CEA手术是针对80%至99%的狭窄进行的,但26%是针对70%至79%的狭窄进行的,4.1%是针对50%至69%的狭窄进行的。在外科医生层面,针对无症状性颈动脉狭窄<80%进行的CEA手术百分比范围为0%至100%。同样,在中心层面,各机构针对无症状性颈动脉狭窄<80%进行的CEA手术百分比范围为0%至100%。

结论

尽管CEA是一种极为常见的手术,但在无症状性颈动脉狭窄是否进行CEA的三个主要决定因素——术前影像学检查、颈动脉双功超声标准以及手术阈值方面,存在广泛差异。规范无症状性颈动脉狭窄的治疗方法将减轻这种差异对医疗成本产生的重大下游影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验