Suppr超能文献

热身过程中进行更大幅度的静态和动态拉伸不会损害功能性动作测试表现。

Greater volumes of static and dynamic stretching within a warm-up do not impair star excursion balance performance.

作者信息

Belkhiria-Turki L, Chaouachi A, Turki O, Hammami R, Chtara M, Amri M, Drinkwater E J, Behm D G

机构信息

Tunisian Research Laboratory "Sports Performance Optimisation" National Center of Medicine and Science in Sports (CNMSS), Tunis, Tunisia -

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2014 Jun;54(3):279-88.

Abstract

Based on the conflicting static stretching (SS) literature and lack of dynamic stretching (DS) literature regarding the effects of differing volumes of stretching on balance, the present study investigated the effects of 4, 8, and 12 sets of SS and DS following a 5 min aerobic running warm-up on the star excursion balance test (SEBT). The objective was to examine an optimal stretch modality and volume to enhance dynamic balance. A randomized, within-subjects experimental design with repeated measures for stretching (SS and DS) versus no-stretching treatment was used to examine the acute effects of 10 (4 sets), 20 (8 sets), and 30 (12 sets) min, of 15s repetitions per muscle of SS and/or DS following a 5 min aerobic warm-up on the performance of the SEBT. Results indicated that a warm-up employing either SS or DS of any volume generally improves SEBT by a "small" amount with effect sizes ranging from 0.06 to 0.50 (11 of 18 conditions>75% likely to exceed the 1.3-1.9% smallest worthwhile change). Secondly, the difference between static and dynamic warm-up on this observed improvement with warm-up improvement was "trivial" to "moderate" (d=0.04 to 0.57) and generally "unclear" (only two of nine conditions>75% likely to exceed the smallest worthwhile change). Finally, the effect of increasing the volume of warm-up on the observed improvement with a warm-up is "trivial" to "small" (d<0.40) and generally "unclear" (only three of 12 conditions>75% likely to exceed the smallest worthwhile change). In summary, an aerobic running warm-up with stretching that increases core and muscle temperature whether it involves SS or DS may be expected to provide small improvements in the SEBT.

摘要

基于关于不同拉伸量对平衡影响的静态拉伸(SS)文献相互矛盾且缺乏动态拉伸(DS)文献的情况,本研究调查了在5分钟有氧跑步热身之后进行4组、8组和12组SS及DS对星形偏移平衡测试(SEBT)的影响。目的是检验一种最佳的拉伸方式和量,以增强动态平衡。采用随机、受试者内实验设计,对拉伸(SS和DS)与不拉伸处理进行重复测量,以检验在5分钟有氧热身之后,每组肌肉进行15秒重复动作的10分钟(4组)、20分钟(8组)和30分钟(12组)的SS和/或DS对SEBT表现的急性影响。结果表明,采用任何量的SS或DS进行热身,通常会使SEBT有“小幅度”改善,效应大小在0.06至0.50之间(18种情况中有11种>75%可能超过1.3 - 1.9%最小有意义变化)。其次,在这种观察到的热身改善方面,静态热身和动态热身之间的差异为“微不足道”到“中等”(d = 0.04至0.57),且通常“不明确”(9种情况中只有两种>75%可能超过最小有意义变化)。最后,增加热身量对观察到的热身改善的影响为“微不足道”到“小幅度”(d < 0.40),且通常“不明确”(12种情况中只有三种>75%可能超过最小有意义变化)。总之,无论是采用SS还是DS,进行能提高核心和肌肉温度的拉伸的有氧跑步热身,可能会使SEBT有小幅度改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验