Shao Aihui, Liang Lichan, Yuan Chunyong, Bian Yufang
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Psychology Department, Shanghai Campus of Nanjing Politics College, Shanghai, China.
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 16;9(4):e95290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095290. eCollection 2014.
This study used the latent class analysis (LCA) to identify and classify Chinese adolescent children's aggressive behaviors. It was found that (1) Adolescent children could be divided into four categories: general children, aggressive children, victimized children and aggressive victimized children. (2) There were significant gender differences among the aggressive victimized children, the aggressive children and the general children. Specifically, aggressive victimized children and aggressive children had greater probabilities of being boys; victimized children had equal probabilities of being boys or girls. (3) Significant differences in loneliness, depression, anxiety and academic achievement existed among the aggressive victims, the aggressor, the victims and the general children, in which the aggressive victims scored the worst in all questionnaires. (4) As protective factors, peer and teacher supports had important influences on children's aggressive and victimized behaviors. Relative to general children, aggressive victims, aggressive children and victimized children had lower probabilities of receiving peer supports. On the other hand, compared to general children, aggressive victims had lower probabilities of receiving teacher supports; while significant differences in the probability of receiving teacher supports did not exist between aggressive children and victimized children.
本研究采用潜在类别分析(LCA)对中国青少年儿童的攻击行为进行识别和分类。研究发现:(1)青少年儿童可分为四类:普通儿童、攻击型儿童、受欺负儿童和攻击 - 受欺负儿童。(2)攻击 - 受欺负儿童、攻击型儿童和普通儿童之间存在显著的性别差异。具体而言,攻击 - 受欺负儿童和攻击型儿童为男孩的概率更高;受欺负儿童为男孩或女孩的概率相等。(3)攻击 - 受欺负者、攻击者、受欺负者和普通儿童在孤独感、抑郁、焦虑和学业成绩方面存在显著差异,其中攻击 - 受欺负者在所有问卷中的得分最差。(4)作为保护因素,同伴和教师支持对儿童的攻击行为和受欺负行为有重要影响。相对于普通儿童,攻击 - 受欺负者、攻击型儿童和受欺负儿童获得同伴支持的概率较低。另一方面,与普通儿童相比,攻击 - 受欺负者获得教师支持的概率较低;而攻击型儿童和受欺负儿童在获得教师支持的概率上不存在显著差异。