Beilecke K, Soeder S, Hufenbach E, Tunn R
DBBZ, Klinik für Urogynäkologie, St. Hedwig Krankenhaus, Berlin.
Praxis für Physiotherapie, DBBZ, Berlin.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2014 Jan;74(1):69-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1360222.
Suburethral tension-free slings (tapes or bands) are an essential component in the operative treatment of urinary incontinence. In the present contribution the influence of the type of suburethral sling (retropubic vs. transobturator) on the myofascial structures of the abdominal, adductor and pelvic floor muscles is examined. For this purpose, 70 patients were prospectively observed clinically and physiotherapeutically. Significant differences were seen in the improvement of the pelvic floor musculature (strength, endurance, speed) after placement of a suburethral sling, irrespective of whether it was of the retropubic or the transobturator type. Thus, after surgical treatment patients should be encouraged to undertake further pelvic floor exercising or this should be prescribed for them. There were no significant changes in the abdominal and adductor muscles but there were slight increases with regard to pain level, pain on palpation, and trigger points after placement of both types of sling; thus this is not a criterion in the decision as to which type of sling to use.
尿道下无张力吊带(带或条)是尿失禁手术治疗的重要组成部分。在本论文中,研究了尿道下吊带类型(耻骨后与经闭孔)对腹部、内收肌和盆底肌肉肌筋膜结构的影响。为此,对70例患者进行了前瞻性临床和物理治疗观察。无论尿道下吊带是耻骨后型还是经闭孔型,放置后盆底肌肉组织(力量、耐力、速度)的改善都存在显著差异。因此,手术治疗后应鼓励患者进一步进行盆底锻炼,或者为他们开出处方。腹部和内收肌没有明显变化,但两种类型的吊带放置后,疼痛程度、触痛和触发点略有增加;因此,这不是决定使用哪种类型吊带的标准。