Sions J Megan, Velasco Teonette O, Teyhen Deydre S, Hicks Gregory E
1Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware. 2Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Ft Detrick, Maryland.
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015 Jan-Mar;38(1):33-9. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000021.
Ultrasound imaging (USI) has been shown to be a reliable measure for direct assessment of the lumbar multifidi among younger adults. However, given age- and chronic low back pain (CLBP)-related spinal changes, similar studies are needed before clinical use of USI among older adults with CLBP. The goals of this study were to evaluate intra- and interexaminer reliability for USI assessment of multifidi thickness at rest and during a contraction and to determine standard error of measurement values (SEMs) and minimal detectable change values (MDCs) among older adults with CLBP.
Thirty-one adults, aged 60 to 85 years, with CLBP were recruited. Two examiners performed USI assessments of multifidus thickness at rest and during a contralateral lower extremity lift. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to estimate inter- and intraexaminer reliability. Additionally, SEMs and MDCs were calculated.
All USI measurement techniques demonstrated excellent within-day, interexaminer procedural reliability (ICCs: 0.82-0.85) and good-to-excellent between-day, interexaminer procedural reliability (ICCs: 0.72-0.79). The SEMs ranged from 0.36 to 0.46 cm; MDCs ranged from 1.01 to 1.26 cm. Regardless of the measurement technique, examiner 1, the more experienced examiner, demonstrated lower SEMs and MDCs than examiner 2.
Lower ICCs, greater SEMs, and greater MDCs for USI multifidus thickness assessment in older adults with CLBP, when compared with previously published, procedural reliability results for younger adults with and without low back pain, may indicate that imaging is more challenging in this patient population. Factors, such as examiner training and participant anthropometrics, may impact reliability.
Good-to-excellent intra- and interexaminer USI procedural reliability may provide clinicians a direct assessment technique for clinical evaluation of the lumbar multifidi in older adults with CLBP. SEMs and MDCs may allow for accurate interpretation of USI assessments in this population.
超声成像(USI)已被证明是直接评估年轻成年人腰椎多裂肌的可靠方法。然而,考虑到与年龄和慢性下腰痛(CLBP)相关的脊柱变化,在CLBP老年患者中临床应用USI之前,还需要进行类似的研究。本研究的目的是评估检查者之间和检查者自身对静息和收缩时多裂肌厚度进行USI评估的可靠性,并确定CLBP老年患者的测量标准误(SEMs)和最小可检测变化值(MDCs)。
招募了31名年龄在60至85岁之间的CLBP成年人。两名检查者对静息和对侧下肢抬起时的多裂肌厚度进行USI评估。组内相关系数(ICCs)用于估计检查者之间和检查者自身的可靠性。此外,还计算了SEMs和MDCs。
所有USI测量技术在日内、检查者间程序可靠性方面表现出色(ICCs:0.82 - 0.85),在日间、检查者间程序可靠性方面表现良好至出色(ICCs:0.72 - 0.79)。SEMs范围为0.36至0.46厘米;MDCs范围为1.01至1.26厘米。无论采用何种测量技术,经验更丰富的检查者1的SEMs和MDCs均低于检查者2。
与之前发表的有或无下腰痛的年轻成年人的程序可靠性结果相比,CLBP老年患者USI多裂肌厚度评估的ICCs较低、SEMs和MDCs较高,这可能表明在该患者群体中成像更具挑战性。检查者培训和参与者人体测量学等因素可能会影响可靠性。
良好至出色的检查者之间和检查者自身USI程序可靠性可能为临床医生提供一种直接评估技术,用于CLBP老年患者腰椎多裂肌的临床评估。SEMs和MDCs可能有助于准确解读该人群的USI评估结果。