Suppr超能文献

全髋关节置换术后连续股神经阻滞、骶管硬膜外阻滞和静脉自控镇痛在疼痛控制方面的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Comparison of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block, Caudal Epidural Block, and Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia in Pain Control After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Study.

作者信息

Nishio Shoji, Fukunishi Shigeo, Juichi Miura, Sahoko Koyanagi, Fujihara Yuki, Fukui Tomokazu, Yoshiya Shinichi

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine , Japan.

Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Anesthesia, Hyogo Prefectural Tsukaguchi Hospital , Japan.

出版信息

Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2014 Mar 12;6(1):5138. doi: 10.4081/or.2014.5138. eCollection 2014 Jan 20.

Abstract

Thirty-six patients who underwent primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomly allocated to 4 groups with different pain control protocols; continuous femoral nerve block (FNB group), single-shot caudal epidural block with morphine (EB group), intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl (IV-PCA group), and systemic administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs group). Postoperative pain was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores and the analgesic effect was compared among the groups. The NRS upon arrival at the recovery room and 6 hours after surgery in the FNB, EB, and IV-PCA groups were significantly lower than that in the NSAIDs group. The amount of additional analgesics requested by the patient was smaller in the FNB, EB, and IV-PCA groups as compared to the NSAIDs group. Regarding the complications related to the analgesia, 5 of the 9 patients in the IV-PCA group complained nausea and vomiting and received antiemetic drugs. Delay in the rehabilitation process due to drowsiness was encountered in 3 patients in this group, while no patient in the FNB and EB groups suffered from delayed rehabilitation. Considering both the analgesic effect and the potential risk of complications, continuous femoral nerve blocks and caudal epidural blocks for are recommended for postoperative pain control after THA procedure.

摘要

三十六例行初次单侧全髋关节置换术(THA)的患者被随机分为4组,采用不同的疼痛控制方案;连续股神经阻滞(FNB组)、单次尾段硬膜外注射吗啡(EB组)、静脉自控镇痛泵输注芬太尼(IV-PCA组)以及全身应用非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs组)。采用数字评分量表(NRS)评分评估术后疼痛,并比较各组的镇痛效果。FNB组、EB组和IV-PCA组患者到达恢复室时及术后6小时的NRS评分显著低于NSAIDs组。与NSAIDs组相比,FNB组、EB组和IV-PCA组患者要求追加的镇痛药用量更少。关于镇痛相关并发症,IV-PCA组9例患者中有5例出现恶心呕吐并接受了止吐药物治疗。该组有3例患者因嗜睡导致康复进程延迟,而FNB组和EB组均无患者出现康复延迟。综合考虑镇痛效果和潜在并发症风险,推荐在THA术后采用连续股神经阻滞和尾段硬膜外阻滞进行疼痛控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad08/3980153/0d31555d9615/or-2014-1-5138-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验