• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全髋关节置换术后连续股神经阻滞、骶管硬膜外阻滞和静脉自控镇痛在疼痛控制方面的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Comparison of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block, Caudal Epidural Block, and Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia in Pain Control After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Study.

作者信息

Nishio Shoji, Fukunishi Shigeo, Juichi Miura, Sahoko Koyanagi, Fujihara Yuki, Fukui Tomokazu, Yoshiya Shinichi

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine , Japan.

Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Anesthesia, Hyogo Prefectural Tsukaguchi Hospital , Japan.

出版信息

Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2014 Mar 12;6(1):5138. doi: 10.4081/or.2014.5138. eCollection 2014 Jan 20.

DOI:10.4081/or.2014.5138
PMID:24744837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3980153/
Abstract

Thirty-six patients who underwent primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomly allocated to 4 groups with different pain control protocols; continuous femoral nerve block (FNB group), single-shot caudal epidural block with morphine (EB group), intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl (IV-PCA group), and systemic administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs group). Postoperative pain was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores and the analgesic effect was compared among the groups. The NRS upon arrival at the recovery room and 6 hours after surgery in the FNB, EB, and IV-PCA groups were significantly lower than that in the NSAIDs group. The amount of additional analgesics requested by the patient was smaller in the FNB, EB, and IV-PCA groups as compared to the NSAIDs group. Regarding the complications related to the analgesia, 5 of the 9 patients in the IV-PCA group complained nausea and vomiting and received antiemetic drugs. Delay in the rehabilitation process due to drowsiness was encountered in 3 patients in this group, while no patient in the FNB and EB groups suffered from delayed rehabilitation. Considering both the analgesic effect and the potential risk of complications, continuous femoral nerve blocks and caudal epidural blocks for are recommended for postoperative pain control after THA procedure.

摘要

三十六例行初次单侧全髋关节置换术(THA)的患者被随机分为4组,采用不同的疼痛控制方案;连续股神经阻滞(FNB组)、单次尾段硬膜外注射吗啡(EB组)、静脉自控镇痛泵输注芬太尼(IV-PCA组)以及全身应用非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs组)。采用数字评分量表(NRS)评分评估术后疼痛,并比较各组的镇痛效果。FNB组、EB组和IV-PCA组患者到达恢复室时及术后6小时的NRS评分显著低于NSAIDs组。与NSAIDs组相比,FNB组、EB组和IV-PCA组患者要求追加的镇痛药用量更少。关于镇痛相关并发症,IV-PCA组9例患者中有5例出现恶心呕吐并接受了止吐药物治疗。该组有3例患者因嗜睡导致康复进程延迟,而FNB组和EB组均无患者出现康复延迟。综合考虑镇痛效果和潜在并发症风险,推荐在THA术后采用连续股神经阻滞和尾段硬膜外阻滞进行疼痛控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad08/3980153/1532c84e3c4f/or-2014-1-5138-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad08/3980153/0d31555d9615/or-2014-1-5138-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad08/3980153/c7e357988e79/or-2014-1-5138-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad08/3980153/1532c84e3c4f/or-2014-1-5138-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad08/3980153/0d31555d9615/or-2014-1-5138-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad08/3980153/c7e357988e79/or-2014-1-5138-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad08/3980153/1532c84e3c4f/or-2014-1-5138-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block, Caudal Epidural Block, and Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia in Pain Control After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Study.全髋关节置换术后连续股神经阻滞、骶管硬膜外阻滞和静脉自控镇痛在疼痛控制方面的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2014 Mar 12;6(1):5138. doi: 10.4081/or.2014.5138. eCollection 2014 Jan 20.
2
Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, continuous epidural analgesia, and continuous femoral nerve sheath block on rehabilitation after unilateral total-hip arthroplasty.静脉注射吗啡自控镇痛、持续硬膜外镇痛和持续股神经鞘阻滞对单侧全髋关节置换术后康复的影响。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;30(5):452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.05.008.
3
Local infiltration analgesia or femoral nerve block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, double-blind study.全髋关节置换术患者术后疼痛管理采用局部浸润镇痛或股神经阻滞:一项随机双盲研究。
Scand J Pain. 2017 Jul;16:223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
4
Postoperative analgesia after total-hip arthroplasty: Comparison of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine and single injection of femoral nerve or psoas compartment block. a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.全髋关节置换术后的镇痛:静脉自控吗啡镇痛与单次股神经或腰大肌间隙阻滞的比较。一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;29(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2003.11.006.
5
A comparison of ultrasound-guided three-in-one femoral nerve block versus parenteral opioids alone for analgesia in emergency department patients with hip fractures: a randomized controlled trial.超声引导下三合一股神经阻滞与单纯静脉使用阿片类药物在急诊科髋部骨折患者镇痛中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;20(6):584-91. doi: 10.1111/acem.12154.
6
Post-operative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of low-dose intrathecal morphine and single-shot ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block: a randomized, single blinded, controlled study.全膝关节置换术后镇痛:低剂量鞘内吗啡与单次超声引导股神经阻滞的比较:一项随机、单盲、对照研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010 Jul;14(7):589-96.
7
Comparison of Continuous Epidural Analgesia, Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Morphine, and Continuous Three-in-One Femoral Nerve Block on Postoperative Outcomes after Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后持续硬膜外镇痛、吗啡患者自控镇痛及连续三合一股神经阻滞对术后结局的比较
Clin Orthop Surg. 2015 Jun;7(2):164-70. doi: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.2.164. Epub 2015 May 18.
8
Femoral nerve block improves analgesia outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.股神经阻滞可改善全膝关节置换术后的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1144-62. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f4b18.
9
Femoral nerve block-sciatic nerve block vs. femoral nerve block-local infiltration analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.全膝关节置换术中股神经阻滞联合坐骨神经阻滞与股神经阻滞联合局部浸润镇痛的比较:一项随机对照试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Dec 15;15:182. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0160-3.
10
[Postoperative pain management after minimally invasive hysterectomy: thoracic epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia].[微创子宫切除术后的疼痛管理:胸段硬膜外镇痛与静脉自控镇痛的比较]
Anaesthesist. 2013 Oct;62(10):797-807. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2234-2. Epub 2013 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Orthopedic Joint Replacements: A Systematic Review.患者自控镇痛在骨科关节置换术中的有效性:一项系统综述。
Life (Basel). 2025 Feb 11;15(2):275. doi: 10.3390/life15020275.
2
Nerve blocks or no nerve blocks for pain control after elective hip replacement (arthroplasty) surgery in adults.成人择期髋关节置换(关节成形术)手术后,使用或不使用神经阻滞进行疼痛控制。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 31;10(10):CD011608. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011608.pub2.
3
Comparison of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block with and Without Combined Sciatic Nerve Block after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Multimodal pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty at the Ranawat Orthopaedic Center.拉纳瓦特骨科中心全髋关节和膝关节置换术后的多模式疼痛管理。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1418-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0728-7. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
2
Continuous lumbar plexus block for postoperative pain control after total hip arthroplasty. A randomized controlled trial.连续腰丛阻滞用于全髋关节置换术后疼痛控制:一项随机对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan;91(1):29-37. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00079.
3
Pain management and accelerated rehabilitation for total hip and total knee arthroplasty.
全髋关节置换术后连续股神经阻滞联合与不联合坐骨神经阻滞的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2017 Jun 23;9(2):7063. doi: 10.4081/or.2017.7063.
全髋关节和全膝关节置换术的疼痛管理与加速康复
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Oct;22(7 Suppl 3):12-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.040.
4
Reduced hospital stay and narcotic consumption, and improved mobilization with local and intraarticular infiltration after hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial of an intraarticular technique versus epidural infusion in 80 patients.髋关节置换术后缩短住院时间、减少麻醉药物用量,并通过局部和关节内浸润改善活动能力:一项针对80例患者的关节内技术与硬膜外输注的随机临床试验
Acta Orthop. 2007 Apr;78(2):180-6. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013654.
5
Total hip arthroplasty as an overnight-stay procedure using an ambulatory continuous psoas compartment nerve block: a prospective feasibility study.采用门诊连续腰大肌间隙神经阻滞的全髋关节置换术作为日间手术:一项前瞻性可行性研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Mar-Apr;31(2):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.10.009.
6
Continuous peripheral nerve blocks in hospital wards after orthopedic surgery: a multicenter prospective analysis of the quality of postoperative analgesia and complications in 1,416 patients.骨科手术后在医院病房进行连续周围神经阻滞:1416例患者术后镇痛质量和并发症的多中心前瞻性分析
Anesthesiology. 2005 Nov;103(5):1035-45. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200511000-00018.
7
Tolerability of acute postoperative pain management: nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, and urinary retention. Evidence from published data.急性术后疼痛管理的耐受性:恶心、呕吐、镇静、瘙痒和尿潴留。来自已发表数据的证据。
Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):584-91. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei227. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
8
Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, continuous epidural analgesia, and continuous femoral nerve sheath block on rehabilitation after unilateral total-hip arthroplasty.静脉注射吗啡自控镇痛、持续硬膜外镇痛和持续股神经鞘阻滞对单侧全髋关节置换术后康复的影响。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;30(5):452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.05.008.
9
Postoperative analgesia after total-hip arthroplasty: Comparison of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine and single injection of femoral nerve or psoas compartment block. a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.全髋关节置换术后的镇痛:静脉自控吗啡镇痛与单次股神经或腰大肌间隙阻滞的比较。一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;29(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2003.11.006.
10
Comparison of continuous 3-in-1 and fascia Iliaca compartment blocks for postoperative analgesia: feasibility, catheter migration, distribution of sensory block, and analgesic efficacy.连续三合一阻滞与髂筋膜间隙阻滞用于术后镇痛的比较:可行性、导管移位、感觉阻滞分布及镇痛效果
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;28(4):309-14. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(03)00183-4.