Mendelman L V, Boosalis M S, Petruska J, Goodman M F
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089-1340.
J Biol Chem. 1989 Aug 25;264(24):14415-23.
The kinetics of forming all possible single base substitution errors are measured for Drosophila melanogaster DNA polymerase alpha and avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase. Seventeen sites along bacteriophage M13 DNA are investigated so that effects of nearest neighbor base stacking on misinsertion kinetics can be evaluated. Polymerase alpha appears to be more error prone than reverse transcriptase. Polymerase alpha forms transversion mispairs at rates comparable to transition mispairs with two exceptions; A.A and C.C are formed with significantly higher and lower efficiencies, respectively. Reverse transcriptase forms transversions with lower efficiencies than transitions, especially low being A.G, G.G, and C.C. For both enzymes, misinsertion frequencies vary typically by 10-fold for the same mispair in different locations. Misinsertion frequency can be expressed as a product of two components, one based on Km and the other on Vmax. DNA polymerase alpha appears to use primarily Km discrimination (100-5000-fold) to achieve insertion fidelity while reverse transcriptase shows a greater balance between Km and Vmax discrimination. Nearest-neighbor base stacking interactions appear to have opposite effects on the two discrimination components. The 5'-nearest neighbor influence on Km is greater for correct insertions than for incorrect, while the influence on Vmax is greater for the incorrect base. Target sites that have pyrimidine as the 5'-nearest neighbor to incoming nucleotides show a higher than average misinsertion component based on Km, but a lower than average component based on Vmax. Conversely, target sites with nearest neighbor purines have a higher than average Vmax component. These results imply that nucleotide misinsertion "hot spots" will occur next to pyrimidines when Km discrimination is dominant and next to purines when Vmax discrimination is dominant. When Vmax and Km discrimination components have similar magnitudes, nearest neighbor effects tend to cancel thereby reducing the effects of base stacking on insertion error rates.
对果蝇DNA聚合酶α和禽成髓细胞瘤病毒逆转录酶形成所有可能的单碱基替换错误的动力学进行了测定。研究了噬菌体M13 DNA上的17个位点,以便评估最近邻碱基堆积对错误插入动力学的影响。DNA聚合酶α似乎比逆转录酶更容易出错。DNA聚合酶α形成颠换错配的速率与转换错配相当,但有两个例外;A·A和C·C的形成效率分别显著更高和更低。逆转录酶形成颠换的效率低于转换,尤其是A·G、G·G和C·C的效率很低。对于这两种酶,在不同位置相同错配的错误插入频率通常相差10倍。错误插入频率可以表示为两个成分的乘积,一个基于Km,另一个基于Vmax。DNA聚合酶α似乎主要利用Km辨别(100 - 5000倍)来实现插入保真度,而逆转录酶在Km和Vmax辨别之间表现出更大的平衡。最近邻碱基堆积相互作用似乎对这两种辨别成分有相反的影响。5'-最近邻对Km的影响在正确插入时比对错误插入时更大,而对Vmax的影响在错误碱基时更大。对于进入核苷酸的5'-最近邻为嘧啶的靶位点,基于Km的错误插入成分高于平均水平,但基于Vmax的成分低于平均水平。相反,最近邻为嘌呤的靶位点具有高于平均水平的Vmax成分。这些结果表明,当Km辨别占主导时,核苷酸错误插入“热点”将出现在嘧啶旁边,而当Vmax辨别占主导时,将出现在嘌呤旁边。当Vmax和Km辨别成分具有相似大小时,最近邻效应往往相互抵消,从而降低碱基堆积对插入错误率的影响。