National Research Council Canada, Montreal, QC H4P 2R2, Canada; Center for Bioinformatics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 0B1, Canada.
National Research Council Canada, Montreal, QC H4P 2R2, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B2, Canada.
Semin Cancer Biol. 2015 Feb;30:4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
Tumor genome sequencing leads to documenting thousands of DNA mutations and other genomic alterations. At present, these data cannot be analyzed adequately to aid in the understanding of tumorigenesis and its evolution. Moreover, we have little insight into how to use these data to predict clinical phenotypes and tumor progression to better design patient treatment. To meet these challenges, we discuss a cancer hallmark network framework for modeling genome sequencing data to predict cancer clonal evolution and associated clinical phenotypes. The framework includes: (1) cancer hallmarks that can be represented by a few molecular/signaling networks. 'Network operational signatures' which represent gene regulatory logics/strengths enable to quantify state transitions and measures of hallmark traits. Thus, sets of genomic alterations which are associated with network operational signatures could be linked to the state/measure of hallmark traits. The network operational signature transforms genotypic data (i.e., genomic alterations) to regulatory phenotypic profiles (i.e., regulatory logics/strengths), to cellular phenotypic profiles (i.e., hallmark traits) which lead to clinical phenotypic profiles (i.e., a collection of hallmark traits). Furthermore, the framework considers regulatory logics of the hallmark networks under tumor evolutionary dynamics and therefore also includes: (2) a self-promoting positive feedback loop that is dominated by a genomic instability network and a cell survival/proliferation network is the main driver of tumor clonal evolution. Surrounding tumor stroma and its host immune systems shape the evolutionary paths; (3) cell motility initiating metastasis is a byproduct of the above self-promoting loop activity during tumorigenesis; (4) an emerging hallmark network which triggers genome duplication dominates a feed-forward loop which in turn could act as a rate-limiting step for tumor formation; (5) mutations and other genomic alterations have specific patterns and tissue-specificity, which are driven by aging and other cancer-inducing agents. This framework represents the logics of complex cancer biology as a myriad of phenotypic complexities governed by a limited set of underlying organizing principles. It therefore adds to our understanding of tumor evolution and tumorigenesis, and moreover, potential usefulness of predicting tumors' evolutionary paths and clinical phenotypes. Strategies of using this framework in conjunction with genome sequencing data in an attempt to predict personalized drug targets, drug resistance, and metastasis for cancer patients, as well as cancer risks for healthy individuals are discussed. Accurate prediction of cancer clonal evolution and clinical phenotypes will have substantial impact on timely diagnosis, personalized treatment and personalized prevention of cancer.
肿瘤基因组测序导致记录了数千个 DNA 突变和其他基因组改变。目前,这些数据还不能充分分析,以帮助了解肿瘤发生及其进化。此外,我们对如何利用这些数据来预测临床表型和肿瘤进展以更好地设计患者治疗知之甚少。为了应对这些挑战,我们讨论了一种癌症标志网络框架,用于对基因组测序数据进行建模,以预测癌症克隆进化和相关的临床表型。该框架包括:(1)癌症标志可以由少数分子/信号网络表示。“网络操作签名”代表基因调控逻辑/强度,可以量化状态转换和标志特征的度量。因此,与网络操作签名相关的基因组改变集可以与标志特征的状态/度量相关联。网络操作签名将基因型数据(即基因组改变)转换为调控表型谱(即调控逻辑/强度)、细胞表型谱(即标志特征),从而导致临床表型谱(即一系列标志特征)。此外,该框架考虑了肿瘤进化动态下标志网络的调控逻辑,因此还包括:(2)以基因组不稳定性网络和细胞存活/增殖网络为主导的自我促进正反馈环是肿瘤克隆进化的主要驱动因素。周围的肿瘤基质及其宿主免疫系统塑造了进化路径;(3)启动转移的细胞运动是肿瘤发生过程中上述自我促进环活动的副产品;(4)引发基因组复制的新兴标志网络主导着正向反馈环,它反过来又可以作为肿瘤形成的限速步骤;(5)突变和其他基因组改变具有特定的模式和组织特异性,这些是由衰老和其他致癌因素驱动的。该框架将复杂的癌症生物学逻辑表示为受有限数量的基本组织原则支配的众多表型复杂性。因此,它增加了我们对肿瘤进化和肿瘤发生的理解,并且更有可能预测肿瘤的进化路径和临床表型。讨论了在尝试预测癌症患者的个性化药物靶点、耐药性和转移以及健康个体的癌症风险时,结合基因组测序数据使用该框架的策略。准确预测癌症克隆进化和临床表型将对及时诊断、个性化治疗和癌症的个性化预防产生重大影响。