Suppr超能文献

用编码细胞中具有 A、B 型特异性功能间隔脂质构建体和喷墨打印在纸上的 ABO 单克隆试剂来绘制精细特异性。

Mapping the fine specificity of ABO monoclonal reagents with A and B type-specific function-spacer-lipid constructs in kodecytes and inkjet printed on paper.

机构信息

Biotech Innovation Centre, School of Engineering, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2014 Oct;54(10):2477-84. doi: 10.1111/trf.12661. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal (MoAb) reagents are routinely used and are usually very reliable for the serologic determination of ABO blood types. However, the fine specificity and cross-reactivity of these reagents are often unknown, particularly against synthetic antigens used in some diagnostic assays. If nonserologic assays or very sensitive techniques other than those specifically prescribed by the manufacturer are used, then there is a risk of incorrect interpretation of results.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Forty-seven MoAbs and two polyclonal ABO reagents were tested against red blood cell (RBC) kodecytes prepared with A trisaccharide, A Type 1, A Type 2, A Type 3, A Type 4, B trisaccharide, B Type 1, B Type 2, acquired B trisaccharide, and Le(a) trisaccharide function-spacer-lipid (FSL) constructs. Natural RBCs were tested in parallel. In addition these FSL constructs were printed onto paper with a desktop inkjet printer and used in a novel immunoassay that identifies reactivity through the appearance of alphanumeric characters.

RESULTS

Mapping of MoAbs with kodecytes and printed FSL constructs revealed a series of broad recognition patterns. All ABO MoAbs tested were reactive with the RBC dominant Type 2 ABO antigens. Unexpectedly some anti-A reagents were reactive against the B Type 1 antigen, while others were poorly reactive with trisaccharide antigens.

CONCLUSIONS

All ABO MoAbs detect the RBC dominant Type 2 ABO antigens; however, some reagents may show minor reactivity with inappropriate blood group antigens, which needs to be considered when using these reagents in alternative or highly sensitive analytic systems.

摘要

背景

单克隆(MoAb)试剂通常用于血清学 ABO 血型鉴定,并且非常可靠。然而,这些试剂的精细特异性和交叉反应性通常是未知的,特别是针对某些诊断检测中使用的合成抗原。如果使用非血清学检测方法或制造商未特别规定的非常敏感的技术,则存在结果解释不正确的风险。

研究设计和方法

将 47 种 MoAb 和 2 种多克隆 ABO 试剂与用 A 三糖、A 型 1、A 型 2、A 型 3、A 型 4、B 三糖、B 型 1、B 型 2、获得的 B 三糖和 Le(a)三糖功能间隔物-脂质(FSL)构建体制备的红细胞(RBC)kodecytes 进行测试。同时对天然 RBC 进行平行测试。此外,这些 FSL 构建体使用台式喷墨打印机打印到纸上,并用于一种新的免疫测定中,该测定通过出现字母数字字符来识别反应性。

结果

用 kodecytes 和打印的 FSL 构建体对 MoAbs 进行作图揭示了一系列广泛的识别模式。测试的所有 ABO MoAb 均与 RBC 优势型 2 ABO 抗原反应。出乎意料的是,一些抗 A 试剂与 B 型 1 抗原反应,而其他试剂与三糖抗原反应不佳。

结论

所有 ABO MoAb 均检测 RBC 优势型 2 ABO 抗原;然而,在替代或高度敏感的分析系统中使用这些试剂时,一些试剂可能会显示出与不适当血型抗原的轻微反应性,需要加以考虑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验