*Division of General Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; †Division of General Internal Medicine and the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; ‡New York State Department of Health, AIDS Institute, New York, NY; and ‖Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Aug 1;66(4):419-27. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000171.
Retention in HIV care has important implications. Few studies examining retention include comprehensive and heterogeneous populations, and few examine factors associated with returning to care after gaps in care. We identified reasons for gaps in care and factors associated with returning to care.
We extracted medical record and state-wide reporting data from 1865 patients with 1 HIV visit to a New York facility in 2008 and subsequent 6-month gap in care. Using mixed effect logistic regression, we examined sociodemographic, clinical, and facility characteristics associated with returning to care.
Most patients were men (63.2%), black (51.4%), had Medicaid (53.9%). Many had CD4 counts >500 cells per cubic millimeter (34.4%) and undetectable viral loads (45.0%). Most (55.9%) had unknown reasons for gaps in care; of those with known reasons, reasons varied considerably. After a gap, 54.6% returned to care. Patients who did (vs. did not) return to care were more likely to have stable housing, longer duration of HIV, high CD4 count, suppressed viral load, antiretroviral medications, and had facilities attempt to contact them. Those who returned to care were less likely to be uninsured and have mental health problems or substance use histories.
Over half of our sample of patients in New York with 1 HIV visit and subsequent 6-month gap in care returned to care; no major reasons for gaps emerged. Nevertheless, our findings emphasize that stabilizing patients' psychosocial factors and contacting patients after a gap in care are key strategies to retain HIV-positive patients in care in New York.
HIV 护理的保留率具有重要意义。少数研究包括全面和异质人群,很少研究与护理间隙后返回护理相关的因素。我们确定了护理间隙的原因,并研究了与返回护理相关的因素。
我们从 2008 年在纽约一家医疗机构接受 1 次 HIV 就诊并随后出现 6 个月护理间隙的 1865 名患者的医疗记录和全州报告数据中提取了信息。使用混合效应逻辑回归,我们检查了与返回护理相关的社会人口统计学、临床和医疗机构特征。
大多数患者为男性(63.2%)、黑人(51.4%)、拥有医疗补助(53.9%)。许多患者的 CD4 计数>500 个细胞/立方毫米(34.4%)和病毒载量不可检测(45.0%)。大多数(55.9%)患者的护理间隙原因未知;对于已知原因的患者,原因各不相同。在出现间隙后,有 54.6%的患者返回护理。与未返回护理的患者相比,返回护理的患者更有可能有稳定的住房、更长的 HIV 病程、更高的 CD4 计数、病毒载量得到抑制、使用抗逆转录病毒药物,并且医疗机构更有可能尝试与他们联系。返回护理的患者更不可能没有保险,也不太可能有心理健康问题或药物滥用史。
在纽约,我们的样本中,有 1 次 HIV 就诊和随后出现 6 个月护理间隙的患者中,超过一半的人返回护理;没有出现主要的护理间隙原因。尽管如此,我们的研究结果强调,稳定患者的社会心理因素并在护理间隙后与患者联系是在纽约留住 HIV 阳性患者的关键策略。