Charles P David, Adler Charles H, Stacy Mark, Comella Cynthia, Jankovic Joseph, Manack Adams Aubrey, Schwartz Marc, Brin Mitchell F
Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, Suite A-1106 MCN, Nashville, TN, 37272, USA,
J Neurol. 2014 Jul;261(7):1309-19. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7343-6. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
To compare profiles of subjects with and without cervical dystonia (CD)-associated pain, to evaluate the contribution of pain and the motor component of CD on quality of life, and to compare the initial botulinum toxin treatment paradigm between pain groups, baseline data were used from the CD Patient Registry for Observation of OnabotulinumtoxinA Efficacy (CD PROBE), a multicenter, prospective, observational registry designed to capture real-world practices and outcomes for onabotulinumtoxinA CD treatment. Subjects were divided into no/mild pain [Pain Numeric Rating Scale (PNRS) score 0-3] and moderate/severe pain groups (PNRS score 4-10). Descriptive and differential statistics were utilized to compare groups. 1,037 subjects completed the first treatment session, reported baseline botulinum toxin status, and completed baseline PNRS. Those with no/mild pain were significantly older at baseline. Those subjects with moderate/severe pain had higher Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Severity (17.7 ± 5.1 vs. 16.2 ± 5.6, p < 0.0001) and Disability (12.7 ± 6.1 vs. 7.5 ± 5.6, p < 0.0001). CD subjects with moderate/severe pain received a higher mean dose (177.3 ± 82.9 vs. 158.0 ± 67.1 U, p = 0.0001) of onabotulinumtoxinA and were injected in more muscles (4.1 ± 1.4 vs. 3.7 ± 1.2, p < 0.0001) at initial treatment. CD PROBE clearly demonstrates the frequency of pain in CD and substantiates its importance when determining an optimal treatment paradigm. Future analyses of CD PROBE will further our understanding of the treatment patterns and outcomes related to onabotulinumtoxinA therapy for this disabling condition.
为比较伴有和不伴有颈部肌张力障碍(CD)相关疼痛的受试者情况,评估疼痛和CD运动成分对生活质量的影响,并比较疼痛组之间的初始肉毒毒素治疗方案,我们使用了CD患者肉毒毒素A疗效观察登记系统(CD PROBE)的基线数据,这是一个多中心、前瞻性、观察性登记系统,旨在记录肉毒毒素A治疗CD的实际应用情况和疗效。受试者被分为无/轻度疼痛组[疼痛数字评定量表(PNRS)评分0 - 3]和中度/重度疼痛组(PNRS评分4 - 10)。采用描述性和差异性统计方法对组间进行比较。1037名受试者完成了首次治疗疗程,报告了基线肉毒毒素状态,并完成了基线PNRS评分。无/轻度疼痛组受试者的基线年龄显著更大。中度/重度疼痛的受试者在多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评定量表上的严重程度更高(17.7 ± 5.1 vs. 16.2 ± 5.6,p < 0.0001),残疾程度也更高(12.7 ± 6.1 vs. 7.5 ± 5.6,p < 0.0001)。中度/重度疼痛的CD受试者在初始治疗时接受了更高平均剂量的肉毒毒素A(177.3 ± 82.9 vs. 158.0 ± 67.1 U,p = 0.0001),且注射的肌肉更多(4.1 ± 1.4 vs. 3.7 ± 1.2,p < 0.0001)。CD PROBE清楚地显示了CD疼痛的发生率,并证实了其在确定最佳治疗方案时的重要性。对CD PROBE的进一步分析将加深我们对肉毒毒素A治疗这种致残性疾病的治疗模式和疗效的理解。