Wehby George L, Collet Brent, Barron Sheila, Romitti Paul A, Ansley Timothy N, Speltz Matthew
Departments of Health Management and Policy, and National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts; and
Child Psychiatry at Seattle Children's Hospital and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Pediatrics. 2014 May;133(5):785-92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3072.
Previous studies of academic achievement of children with oral clefts have mostly relied on small, clinic-based samples prone to ascertainment bias. In the first study in the United States to use a population-based sample with direct assessment, we evaluated the academic achievement of children with oral clefts relative to their classmates.
Children born with isolated oral clefts in Iowa from 1983 to 2003 were identified from the Iowa Registry for Congenital and Inherited Disorders and matched to unaffected classmates by gender, school/school district, and month and year of birth. Academic achievement was assessed by using standardized tests of academic progress developed by the Iowa Testing Programs. Iowa Testing Programs data were linked to birth certificates for all children. Regression models controlled for household demographic and socioeconomic factors. The analytical sample included 588 children with clefts contributing 3735 child-grade observations and 1874 classmates contributing 13 159 child-grade observations.
Children with oral clefts had lower scores than their classmates across all domains and school levels, with a 5-percentile difference in the overall composite score. Children with clefts were approximately one-half grade level behind their classmates and had higher rates of academic underachievement and use of special education services by 8 percentage points. Group differences were slightly lower but remained large and significant after adjusting for many background characteristics.
Children with oral clefts underperformed across all academic areas and grade levels compared with their classmates. The results support a model of early testing and intervention among affected children to identify and reduce academic deficits.
以往关于腭裂儿童学业成就的研究大多依赖于小型的、基于诊所的样本,容易出现确定偏倚。在美国首次使用基于人群的样本并进行直接评估的研究中,我们评估了腭裂儿童相对于其同学的学业成就。
从爱荷华州先天性和遗传性疾病登记处识别出1983年至2003年在爱荷华州出生的孤立性腭裂儿童,并按性别、学校/学区以及出生月份和年份与未受影响的同学进行匹配。学业成就通过爱荷华州测试项目开发的学业进展标准化测试进行评估。爱荷华州测试项目的数据与所有儿童的出生证明相关联。回归模型控制了家庭人口统计学和社会经济因素。分析样本包括588名腭裂儿童,提供了3735个儿童年级观察数据,以及1874名同学,提供了13159个儿童年级观察数据。
腭裂儿童在所有领域和学校水平上的得分均低于其同学,总体综合得分相差5个百分点。腭裂儿童比其同学落后约半个年级水平,学业成绩不佳和使用特殊教育服务的比例高出8个百分点。在调整了许多背景特征后,组间差异略有降低,但仍然很大且显著。
与同学相比,腭裂儿童在所有学术领域和年级水平上的表现都较差。研究结果支持对受影响儿童进行早期测试和干预的模式,以识别和减少学业缺陷。