Propensity score analysis of clinical outcome after bypass surgery vs. endovascular therapy for infrainguinal artery disease in patients with critical limb ischemia.

PURPOSE

To compare endovascular therapy (EVT) outcomes to those of bypass surgery (BSG) for infrainguinal artery disease in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of 1053 CLI patients (1053 first treated limbs) who underwent BSG (n=230) or EVT (n=823) for de novo infrainguinal lesions between January 2004 and December 2009 at 14 Japanese centers. Propensity score analysis was used for risk adjustment in multivariate analysis and for one-to-one matching (n=200 in each group). Amputation-free survival, overall survival, limb salvage, and freedom from major adverse limb events (any repeat revascularization or major amputation) were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 30±16 months. In the overall series, there was no significant difference at 3 years between the EVT and BSG groups in amputation-free survival (60.5% vs. 62.1%, p=0.84), limb salvage (88.7% vs. 85.4%, p=0.24), or overall survival (65.8% vs. 69.2%, p=0.40). However, freedom from adverse limb events was significantly lower in the EVT group (56.6% vs. 69.2%, p=0.02) at 3 years. In the matched pairs analysis, there was no significant difference in any outcome between BSG and EVT at 3 years: amputation-free survival 66.3% vs. 62.0 (p=0.44), limb salvage 88.8% vs. 84.8% (p=0.44), survival 73.8% vs. 68.8% (p=0.61), and freedom from adverse limb events 61.3% vs. 69.1% (p=0.27).

CONCLUSION

Our cohort suggested that the frequency of serious adverse events after EVT was comparable to that after BSG in CLI patients who underwent their first infrainguinal revascularization.