Debus E S, Manzoni D, Behrendt C-A, Heidemann F, Grundmann R T
Klinik und Poliklinik für Gefäßmedizin, Universitäres Herzzentrum Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
, In den Grüben 144, 84489, Burghausen, Deutschland.
Chirurg. 2016 Apr;87(4):308-15. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0149-y.
Endovascular therapy has widely replaced conventional open vascular surgical reconstruction. For this reason, both techniques were widely considered to be competing approaches. Evidence-based data from randomized prospective trials, meta-analyses and clinical registries, however, demonstrated that both techniques should be used to complement each other. It became increasingly more evident that the use of either procedure depends on the underlying disease and the anatomical conditions, whereby a combination of both (hybrid approach) may be the preferred option in certain situations. This review focuses on the treatment of patients with carotid artery stenosis, intermittent claudication, critical limb ischemia and acute limb ischemia.
血管内治疗已广泛取代传统的开放性血管外科重建术。因此,这两种技术曾被广泛认为是相互竞争的方法。然而,来自随机前瞻性试验、荟萃分析和临床登记处的循证数据表明,这两种技术应相互补充。越来越明显的是,采用哪种手术方法取决于基础疾病和解剖条件,在某些情况下,两者结合(杂交手术)可能是首选方案。本综述重点关注颈动脉狭窄、间歇性跛行、严重肢体缺血和急性肢体缺血患者的治疗。