• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-LIF)与传统腰椎椎间融合术的影像学结果比较

Radiographic Results of Minimally Invasive (MIS) Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LIF) Compared with Conventional Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

作者信息

Lim Jae Kwan, Kim Sung Min

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Spine. 2013 Jun;10(2):65-71. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2013.10.2.65. Epub 2013 Jun 30.

DOI:10.14245/kjs.2013.10.2.65
PMID:24757461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3941727/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the radiographic results of minimally invasive (MIS) anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

METHODS

Twelve and nineteen patients who underwent MIS-ALIF, MIS-TLIF, respectively, from 2006 to 2008 were analyzed with a minimum 24-months' follow-up. Additionally, 18 patients treated with single level open TLIF surgery in 2007 were evaluated as a comparative group. X-rays and CT images were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Fusion and subsidence rates were determined, and radiographic parameters, including lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), fused segment angle (FSA), sacral slope angle (SSA), disc height (DH), and foraminal height (FH), were analyzed. These parameters were also compared between the open and MIS-TLIF groups.

RESULTS

In the MIS interbody fusion group, statistically significant increases were observed in LLA, FSA, and DH and FH between preoperative and final values. The changes in LLA, FSA, and DH were significantly increased in the MIS-ALIF group compared with the MIS-TLIF group, but SSA and FH were not significantly different. No significant differences were seen between open and MIS-TLIF except for DH. The interbody subsidence and fusion rates of the MIS groups were 12.0±4% and 96%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radiographic results of MIS interbody fusion surgery are as favorable as those with conventional surgery regarding fusion, restoration of disc height, foraminal height, and lumbar lordosis. MIS-ALIF is more effective than MIS-TLIF for intervertebral disc height restoration and lumbar lordosis.

摘要

目的

评估微创前路腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-ALIF)和经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)的影像学结果。

方法

分析2006年至2008年分别接受MIS-ALIF、MIS-TLIF的12例和19例患者,随访至少24个月。此外,将2007年接受单节段开放TLIF手术的18例患者作为对照组进行评估。在术前、术后及末次随访时对X线和CT图像进行评估。确定融合率和下沉率,并分析包括腰椎前凸角(LLA)、融合节段角(FSA)、骶骨倾斜角(SSA)、椎间盘高度(DH)和椎间孔高度(FH)等影像学参数。还对开放手术组和MIS-TLIF组的这些参数进行了比较。

结果

在MIS椎间融合术组中,术前与末次随访时LLA、FSA、DH及FH均有统计学意义的增加。与MIS-TLIF组相比,MIS-ALIF组LLA、FSA及DH的变化显著增加,但SSA和FH无显著差异。除DH外,开放手术组和MIS-TLIF组之间未见显著差异。MIS组的椎间融合器下沉率和融合率分别为12.0±4%和96%。

结论

MIS椎间融合手术在融合、椎间盘高度恢复、椎间孔高度及腰椎前凸恢复方面的影像学结果与传统手术一样良好。MIS-ALIF在恢复椎间盘高度和腰椎前凸方面比MIS-TLIF更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b25/3941727/9dc38cccf309/kjs-10-65-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b25/3941727/ac56287b9106/kjs-10-65-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b25/3941727/9dc38cccf309/kjs-10-65-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b25/3941727/ac56287b9106/kjs-10-65-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b25/3941727/9dc38cccf309/kjs-10-65-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Radiographic Results of Minimally Invasive (MIS) Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LIF) Compared with Conventional Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-LIF)与传统腰椎椎间融合术的影像学结果比较
Korean J Spine. 2013 Jun;10(2):65-71. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2013.10.2.65. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
2
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.
3
A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.现代经前路腰椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗腰骶段的比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jul 28;39(6):785-792. doi: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE221224. Print 2023 Dec 1.
4
Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.术式是否有影响?单节段腰椎融合术中脊柱骨盆参数的比较影像学分析。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):1999-2008. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
[Clinical and radiologic comparison between oblique lateral interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis].[斜外侧椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的临床与影像学比较]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 May 25;36(5):414-9. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.05.004.
6
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance.前路腰椎椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的比较:对椎间孔高度、局部椎间盘角度、腰椎前凸及矢状面平衡恢复的影响
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Oct;7(4):379-86. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/10/379.
7
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
8
Short-term and mid-term evaluation of three types of minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery for treatment of L4/L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.三种微创腰椎融合术治疗 L4/L5 退变性腰椎滑脱的短期和中期评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 21;14(1):4320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54970-5.
9
[Comparison of intervertebral height and lordosis of fusion segment between open- and minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions].[开放与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术融合节段椎间高度与前凸的比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 15;34(4):422-427. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201910060.
10
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与斜外侧腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 18;22(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04687-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative spinal alignment comparison of lateral versus supine patient position L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion.对比侧卧位与仰卧位患者行 L5-S1 前路腰椎体间融合术的术后脊柱对线情况。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Sep;31(9):2248-2254. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07252-5. Epub 2022 May 25.
2
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable articulating interbody spacers significantly improves radiographic outcomes compared to static interbody spacers.与静态椎间融合器相比,使用可扩张关节式椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术能显著改善影像学结果。
J Spine Surg. 2021 Sep;7(3):300-309. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-630.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody single level fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间单节段融合术的临床及影像学结果
Asian Spine J. 2011 Jun;5(2):111-6. doi: 10.4184/asj.2011.5.2.111. Epub 2011 May 2.
2
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a single interbody cage and a tubular retraction system : technical tips, and perioperative, radiologic and clinical outcomes.使用单个椎间融合器和管状牵开系统的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:技术要点、围手术期、影像学及临床结果
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010 Sep;48(3):219-24. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2010.48.3.219. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
3
Defining the MIS-TLIF: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Technologies Used by Surgeons Worldwide.
定义微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:对全球外科医生所使用技术和工艺的系统评价
Global Spine J. 2020 Apr;10(2 Suppl):151S-167S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219882346. Epub 2020 May 28.
4
Distinct fusion intersegmental parameters regarding local sagittal balance provide similar clinical outcomes: a comparative study of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.关于局部矢状面平衡的不同节段间融合参数提供了相似的临床结果:微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的比较研究
BMC Surg. 2020 May 12;20(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00765-0.
5
[Comparison of intervertebral height and lordosis of fusion segment between open- and minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions].[开放与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术融合节段椎间高度与前凸的比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 15;34(4):422-427. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201910060.
6
Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Meshed Allograft Containment Device: Analysis of Subsidence With 12-Month Minimum Follow-Up.使用可扩张网状同种异体骨容纳装置的微创腰椎椎间融合术:至少随访12个月的沉降分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Aug 31;13(4):321-328. doi: 10.14444/6044. eCollection 2019 Aug.
7
Dynamic Posture-Related Preoperative Pain as a Single Clinical Criterion in Patient Selection for Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Without Direct Decompression.动态姿势相关术前疼痛作为无直接减压的极外侧椎间融合术患者选择的单一临床标准
Global Spine J. 2019 Sep;9(6):575-582. doi: 10.1177/2192568218811317. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
8
Complication avoidance in minimally invasive spinal surgery.微创脊柱手术中的并发症预防
J Spine Surg. 2019 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S57-S67. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.04.03.
9
Biomechanics of L5/S1 in Long Thoracolumbosacral Constructs: A Cadaveric Study.长节段胸腰段骶骨固定中L5/S1的生物力学:一项尸体研究。
Global Spine J. 2018 Sep;8(6):607-614. doi: 10.1177/2192568218759037. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
10
Spinal Biologics in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery.微创腰椎手术中的脊柱生物制剂
Minim Invasive Surg. 2018 Apr 5;2018:5230350. doi: 10.1155/2018/5230350. eCollection 2018.
Paraspinal-approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis.
经椎间孔入路脊柱旁腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Oct;13(4):500-8. doi: 10.3171/2010.4.SPINE09691.
4
Clinical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar foraminal stenosis: preoperative diagnosis and surgical strategy.腰椎椎间孔狭窄后路腰椎椎间融合术的临床疗效:术前诊断与手术策略
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 May;24(3):137-41. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181e1cd99.
5
Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis of fusion rates.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术:融合率的荟萃分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 15;35(26):2273-81. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cd42cc.
6
Effect of sagittal spinal balance, levels of posterior instrumentation, and length of follow-up on low back pain in patients undergoing posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease: a multifactorial analysis.后路减压融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病患者矢状位脊柱平衡、后路内固定节段数和随访时间对腰痛的影响:多因素分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 15;35(8):898-905. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d51e84.
7
Single-level instrumented mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients.老年患者的单节段器械辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Aug;9(2):137-44. doi: 10.3171/SPI/2008/9/8/137.
8
Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability.经皮椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗退变性腰椎不稳症
Neurosurgery. 2007 Apr;60(4 Suppl 2):203-12; discussion 212-3. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000255388.03088.B7.
9
Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients.老年患者后路腰椎椎间融合术的手术疗效
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Dec;88(12):2714-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00186.
10
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术联合单侧椎弓根螺钉固定术
Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Mar 15;20(3):E10. doi: 10.3171/foc.2006.20.3.11.