• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用可扩张网状同种异体骨容纳装置的微创腰椎椎间融合术:至少随访12个月的沉降分析

Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Meshed Allograft Containment Device: Analysis of Subsidence With 12-Month Minimum Follow-Up.

作者信息

Kolcun John Paul G, Ghobrial George M, Crandall Kenneth M, Chang Ken Hsuan-Kan, Pacchiarotti Giacomo, Wang Michael Y

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Department of Neurological Surgery, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Aug 31;13(4):321-328. doi: 10.14444/6044. eCollection 2019 Aug.

DOI:10.14444/6044
PMID:31531282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6724751/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We have previously reported the use of a minimally invasive allograft-filled expandable meshed-bag containment system in the lumbar spine. Subsidence has not been reported with this device. In this retrospective case series, we describe subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion using this device, with 12-month minimum radiographic follow-up.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients that underwent 1- or 2-level interbody fusion with at least 1 year of follow-up were included in this study. Preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up lumbar radiographs were analyzed to measure disc height at the anterior and posterior margins of the disc space, as well as the neuroforaminal height.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were identified, with a mean age of 63.4 years (± 11.8). A total of 61 levels were treated, with successful fusion observed in 54 levels (88.5%). The mean radiographic follow-up was 24.3 months (± 11.2). The mean disc height pre- and postoperatively was 6.9 mm (± 3.2) and 10.1 mm (± 2.9,  < .001), respectively. The mean disc height at final follow-up was 8.3 mm (± 2.4). Average disc height subsidence was 1.8 mm (± 1.7,  < .001). Overall, average disc height increased by a net 1.3 mm (± 2.5,  < .001). The mean neuroforaminal height pre- and postoperatively was 18.0 mm (± 3.3) and 20.7 mm (± 3.6,  < .001), respectively. The mean neuroforaminal height at final follow-up was 19.2 mm (± 3.4). Average neuroforaminal height subsidence was 1.3 mm (± 3.4,  = .012). Overall, average neuroforaminal height increased by a net 1.7 mm (± 2.8,  = .004). No significant difference in subsidence was observed between 1- and 2-level surgeries.

CONCLUSION

An expandable allograft containment system is a feasible alternative for lumbar interbody fusion. Due to its biologic and mechanical nature, the surgeon using such constructs should account for an anticipated average of 18% loss of interbody height due to subsidence during the bony remodeling/fusion process.

摘要

背景

我们之前报道过在腰椎使用一种微创的同种异体骨填充可扩张网袋容纳系统。尚未有关于该装置下沉的报道。在这个回顾性病例系列中,我们描述了使用该装置进行腰椎椎间融合术后的下沉情况,至少有12个月的影像学随访。

方法

本研究纳入了连续接受1或2节段椎间融合且至少随访1年的成年患者。分析术前、术后及最终随访时的腰椎X线片,以测量椎间隙前缘和后缘的椎间盘高度以及神经孔高度。

结果

共确定41例患者,平均年龄63.4岁(±11.8)。共治疗61个节段,54个节段观察到成功融合(88.5%)。影像学平均随访时间为24.3个月(±11.2)。术前和术后的平均椎间盘高度分别为6.9mm(±3.2)和10.1mm(±2.9,P<0.001)。最终随访时的平均椎间盘高度为8.3mm(±2.4)。平均椎间盘高度下沉为1.8mm(±1.7,P<0.001)。总体而言,平均椎间盘高度净增加1.3mm(±2.5,P<0.001)。术前和术后的平均神经孔高度分别为18.0mm(±3.3)和20.7mm(±3.6,P<0.001)。最终随访时的平均神经孔高度为19.2mm(±3.4)。平均神经孔高度下沉为1.3mm(±3.4,P=0.012)。总体而言,平均神经孔高度净增加1.7mm(±2.8,P=0.004)。1节段和2节段手术之间在下沉方面未观察到显著差异。

结论

可扩张同种异体骨容纳系统是腰椎椎间融合的一种可行替代方案。由于其生物学和力学特性,使用这种结构的外科医生应考虑到在骨重塑/融合过程中由于下沉预计椎间高度平均损失18%。

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Meshed Allograft Containment Device: Analysis of Subsidence With 12-Month Minimum Follow-Up.使用可扩张网状同种异体骨容纳装置的微创腰椎椎间融合术:至少随访12个月的沉降分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Aug 31;13(4):321-328. doi: 10.14444/6044. eCollection 2019 Aug.
2
Two-year Clinical and Radiographic Results with a Multidimensional, Expandable Interbody Implant in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery.微创腰椎手术中使用多维可扩张椎间融合器的两年临床及影像学结果
Cureus. 2020 Feb 21;12(2):e7070. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7070.
3
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable articulating interbody spacers significantly improves radiographic outcomes compared to static interbody spacers.与静态椎间融合器相比,使用可扩张关节式椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术能显著改善影像学结果。
J Spine Surg. 2021 Sep;7(3):300-309. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-630.
4
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.
5
Laterally Placed Expandable Interbody Spacers With and Without Adjustable Lordosis Improve Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study.具有和不具有可调节前凸的侧向放置可扩展椎间融合器可改善影像学和临床结果:一项两年随访研究
Cureus. 2021 Dec 9;13(12):e20302. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20302. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术采用可扩张 cage:术后晚期沉降风险增加,但围手术期结局无明显改善:一项临床单中心研究。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Dec;156:e57-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.127. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
7
Early Experience With Uniplanar Versus Biplanar Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中单平面与双平面可扩张椎间融合器的早期经验
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):487-497. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244870.435. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
8
Laterally placed expandable interbody spacers with and without adjustable lordosis improve patient outcomes: A preliminary one-year chart review.带和不带可调前凸的侧向可扩张椎间间隔物可改善患者预后:初步为期一年的图表回顾。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Feb;213:107123. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107123. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
9
Transfacet Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Interbody Device-Part II: Consecutive Case Series.使用可扩张椎间融合器的经小关节微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术——第二部分:连续病例系列
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 Oct 15;19(5):518-529. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa144.
10
Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.单纯侧方椎间融合术后 cage 沉降的影像学和临床评估。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jul;19(1):110-8. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12319. Epub 2013 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Bone graft substitutes used in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a contemporary systematic review of fusion rates and complications.用于腰椎前路椎间融合术的骨移植替代物:融合率和并发症的当代系统评价
J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):548-561. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-24. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with an expandable interbody device: Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes.使用可扩张椎间融合器的经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:两年临床及影像学结果
N Am Spine Soc J. 2023 Oct 13;16:100286. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100286. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Understanding the Future Prospects of Synergizing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery with Ceramics and Regenerative Cellular Therapies.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的对比
Indian J Orthop. 2016 Sep;50(5):464-472. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.189607.
2
Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.腰椎椎间融合术:技术、适应证以及椎间融合选择的比较,包括后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)、改良经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)、斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术/前斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF/ATP)、侧方腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)和前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)
J Spine Surg. 2015 Dec;1(1):2-18. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05.
3
理解微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与陶瓷和再生细胞疗法协同作用的未来前景。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 31;22(7):3638. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073638.
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Technology: A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of 50 Patients.
使用可扩张技术的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:50例患者的临床及影像学分析
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;90:228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.075. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
4
Two-Year Comparative Outcomes of MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Part II: Radiographic Findings.微创外侧与微创经椎间孔椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的两年比较结果:第二部分:影像学结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S133-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001472.
5
MIS Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Literature Review and Biomechanical Comparison of an Expandable MIS TLIF With Conventional TLIF and ALIF.微创可扩张椎间融合器:可扩张微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与传统经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术及前路腰椎椎间融合术的文献综述与生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S44-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001465.
6
The safety profile of lumbar spinal surgery in elderly patients 85 years and older.85岁及以上老年患者腰椎手术的安全性概况。
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E3. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15180.
7
Expandable Polyaryl-Ether-Ether-Ketone Spacers for Interbody Distraction in the Lumbar Spine.可膨胀聚芳醚醚酮间隔物在腰椎体间撑开
Global Spine J. 2015 Jun;5(3):169-78. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1552988.
8
An attempt at clinically defining and assessing minimally invasive surgery compared with traditional "open" spinal surgery.与传统“开放”脊柱手术相比,对微创手术进行临床定义和评估的尝试。
SAS J. 2011 Dec 1;5(4):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2011.06.002. eCollection 2011.
9
Radiographic Results of Minimally Invasive (MIS) Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LIF) Compared with Conventional Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-LIF)与传统腰椎椎间融合术的影像学结果比较
Korean J Spine. 2013 Jun;10(2):65-71. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2013.10.2.65. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
10
Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.使用聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2进行单纯前路腰椎椎间融合的融合及沉降率
Eur Spine J. 2013 Dec;22(12):2869-75. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2948-5. Epub 2013 Aug 19.