• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间单节段融合术的临床及影像学结果

The clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody single level fusion.

作者信息

Kim Moon-Chan, Chung Hung-Tae, Kim Dong-Jun, Kim Sang-Hyuk, Jeon Sang-Ho

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Busan Bumin Hospital, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Asian Spine J. 2011 Jun;5(2):111-6. doi: 10.4184/asj.2011.5.2.111. Epub 2011 May 2.

DOI:10.4184/asj.2011.5.2.111
PMID:21629486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3095800/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study that was done according to clinical and radiological evaluation.

PURPOSE

We analyzed the clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody single level fusion.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is effective surgical method for treating degenerative lumbar disease.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 56 patients who were available for longer than 2 years (range, 24 to 45 months) follow-up after undergoing minimally invasive transforminal lumbar interbody single level fusion. Clinical evaluation was performed by the analysis of the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Kirkaldy-Willis score. For the radiological evaluation, the disc space height, the segmental lumbar lordotic angle and the whole lumbar lordotic angle were analyzed. At the final follow-up after operation, the fusion rate was analyzed according to Bridwell's anterior fusion grade.

RESULTS

For the evaluation of clinical outcomes, the VAS score was reduced from an average of 6.7 prior to surgery to an average of 1.8 at the final follow-up. The ODI was decreased from an average of 36.5 prior to surgery to an average of 12.8 at the final follow-up. In regard to the clinical outcomes evaluated by the Kirkaldy-Willis score, better than good results were obtained in 52 cases (92.9%). For the radiological evaluation, the disc space height (p = 0.002), and the whole lumbar lordotic angle (p = 0.001) were increased at the final follow-up. At the final follow-up, regarding the interbody fusion, radiological union was obtained in 54 cases (95.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

We think that if surgeons become familiar with the surgical techniques, this is a useful method for minimally invasive spinal surgery.

摘要

研究设计

这是一项根据临床和影像学评估进行的回顾性研究。

目的

我们分析了微创经椎间孔腰椎单节段椎间融合术的临床和影像学结果。

文献综述

微创经椎间孔腰椎融合术是治疗退行性腰椎疾病的有效手术方法。

方法

本研究对56例接受微创经椎间孔腰椎单节段融合术后随访时间超过2年(范围为24至45个月)的患者进行。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、奥斯维斯特残疾指数(ODI)和柯卡尔迪 - 威利斯评分进行临床评估。对于影像学评估,分析椎间隙高度、节段性腰椎前凸角和整个腰椎前凸角。在术后最后一次随访时,根据布里德韦尔的前路融合分级分析融合率。

结果

对于临床结果评估,VAS评分从术前平均6.7降至最后一次随访时的平均1.8。ODI从术前平均36.5降至最后一次随访时的平均12.8。根据柯卡尔迪 - 威利斯评分评估的临床结果,52例(92.9%)取得了优于良好的结果。对于影像学评估,最后一次随访时椎间隙高度(p = 0.002)和整个腰椎前凸角(p = 0.001)增加。在最后一次随访时,关于椎间融合,54例(95.4%)获得了影像学融合。

结论

我们认为,如果外科医生熟悉手术技术,这是一种微创脊柱手术的有用方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c5/3095800/3d2cbd39bb69/asj-5-111-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c5/3095800/09493912ca46/asj-5-111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c5/3095800/3d2cbd39bb69/asj-5-111-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c5/3095800/09493912ca46/asj-5-111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c5/3095800/3d2cbd39bb69/asj-5-111-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody single level fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间单节段融合术的临床及影像学结果
Asian Spine J. 2011 Jun;5(2):111-6. doi: 10.4184/asj.2011.5.2.111. Epub 2011 May 2.
2
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Unilateral Fixation for Degenerative Lumbar Disease.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术及单侧固定治疗退行性腰椎疾病
Orthop Surg. 2017 Aug;9(3):277-283. doi: 10.1111/os.12345.
3
[Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].[象限通道下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度退行性腰椎滑脱症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Mar 25;32(3):199-206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.002.
4
Clinical and Short-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Expandable Lordotic Devices.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术联合可扩张矫形装置的临床及短期影像学结果。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Feb 1;86(2):E147-E155. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz402.
5
Retrospective Case Control Study: Clinical and Computer Tomographic Fusion and Subsidence Evaluation for Single Level Uniportal Endoscopic Posterolateral Approach Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Microscopic Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.回顾性病例对照研究:单节段单通道内镜后外侧入路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与显微镜下微创经椎间孔椎间融合术的临床及计算机断层扫描融合与下沉评估
Global Spine J. 2023 Mar;13(2):304-315. doi: 10.1177/2192568221994796. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
6
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.
7
Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.L4-5椎体滑脱症中的放射学相邻节段退变:动态稳定与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Sep;29(3):250-258. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.SPINE17993. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
8
[Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral tubular channels].[单节段腰椎滑脱症经双侧通道微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的临床疗效]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 1;55(4):279-284. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.04.009.
9
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
10
Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF)联合单侧椎弓根螺钉固定治疗腰椎退行性疾病的影像学分析
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Feb;29(1):E1-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000042.

引用本文的文献

1
Fusion's Location and Quality within the Fixated Segment Following Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF).经椎间孔椎体间融合术(TLIF)后融合物在固定节段内的位置及质量
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 24;11(21):2814. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212814.
2
Postoperative cage migration and subsidence following TLIF surgery is not associated with bony fusion.TLIF 手术后的椎间笼迁移和下沉与骨性融合无关。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 3;13(1):12597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38801-7.
3
OLIF versus MI-TLIF for patients with degenerative lumbar disease: Is one procedure superior to the other? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiographic results of single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disease: focusing on changes of segmental lordosis in fusion segment.单节段经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病的影像学结果:重点关注融合节段的节段性前凸变化。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2009 Dec;1(4):207-13. doi: 10.4055/cios.2009.1.4.207. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
2
Comparative study of PILF and TLIF treatment in adult degenerative spondylolisthesis.成人退行性腰椎滑脱症中经皮椎弓根螺钉辅助椎间融合术(PILF)与经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)治疗的比较研究
Eur Spine J. 2008 Oct;17(10):1311-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0739-1. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
3
退行性腰椎疾病患者的斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)与改良经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF):一种手术方法是否优于另一种?一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 13;9:1014314. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1014314. eCollection 2022.
4
Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review.融合率与手术相关因素对退行性脊柱疾病腰椎体间融合术的影响:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2020 Apr;104(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00634-x. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
5
Allograft Versus Demineralized Bone Matrix in Instrumented and Noninstrumented Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review.器械辅助与非器械辅助腰椎融合术中同种异体骨与脱矿骨基质的比较:一项系统评价
Global Spine J. 2018 Jun;8(4):396-412. doi: 10.1177/2192568217735342. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
6
Outcome of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in spondylolisthesis-A clinico-radiological correlation.腰椎滑脱症经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的疗效——临床与影像学相关性研究
J Orthop. 2018 Feb 24;15(2):359-362. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.02.017. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
Spinal Biologics in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery.微创腰椎手术中的脊柱生物制剂
Minim Invasive Surg. 2018 Apr 5;2018:5230350. doi: 10.1155/2018/5230350. eCollection 2018.
8
[Minimally invasive extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].微创椎间孔外腰椎椎间融合术
Surg Neurol Int. 2018 Jan 22;9(Suppl 1):S1-S7. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_280_17. eCollection 2018.
9
Role of coflex as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.Coflex作为症状性腰椎管狭窄减压辅助手段的作用。
Asian Spine J. 2014 Apr;8(2):161-9. doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.2.161. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
10
Radiographic Results of Minimally Invasive (MIS) Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LIF) Compared with Conventional Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-LIF)与传统腰椎椎间融合术的影像学结果比较
Korean J Spine. 2013 Jun;10(2):65-71. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2013.10.2.65. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症:至少2年随访后的技术与疗效
Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25(2):E16. doi: 10.3171/FOC/2008/25/8/E16.
4
Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach.采用微创方法或传统开放方法进行单节段腰椎后路椎间融合术的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 1;32(5):537-43. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000256473.49791.f4.
5
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术:100例连续患者的临床、影像学结果及并发症
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Aug;18(4):337-46. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000166642.69189.45.
6
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF):技术可行性及初步结果
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Feb;18 Suppl:S1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000132291.50455.d0.
7
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术:一种安全的技术,三至五年的效果令人满意。
Eur Spine J. 2005 Aug;14(6):551-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0830-1. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
8
Minimally invasive lumbar fusion.微创腰椎融合术
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15 Suppl):S26-35. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076895.52418.5E.
9
Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion.腰椎椎间融合术的后路与经椎间孔入路比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Mar 1;26(5):567-71. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103010-00023.
10
1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study.1997年沃尔沃临床研究奖获得者。椎弓根螺钉内固定对腰椎后外侧融合术功能结果和融合率的影响:一项前瞻性、随机临床研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24):2813-22. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00004.