Suppr超能文献

下段输尿管结石的管理:一项前瞻性研究。

Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study.

作者信息

Etafy Mohamed, Morsi Gamal A M, Beshir Mansour S M, Soliman Sheri S, Galal Hussein A, Ortiz-Vanderdys Cervando

机构信息

Jackson Health System, Miami, FL, USA.

Faculty of Medicine, Urology Department, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt.

出版信息

Cent European J Urol. 2014;66(4):456-62. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2013.04.art19. Epub 2014 Jan 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the current concepts in lower ureteric stone management.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between October 2008 and November 2010, 190 patients of both sexes and of different age groups with lower ureteric stones, underwent in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (48 cases), ureterorenoscopy (URS) (120 cases) and open stone surgery (OSS) (22 cases). The patients' clinical and radiological findings, as well as stone characteristics, were reviewed and correlated with the stone-free status.

RESULTS

In the ESWL group, the operative time was 43.13 +22.5 min; the average number of sessions/patients was 1.5 sessions; the average number of SW/patients was 4500 SW/patients; the average energy was 16.5 kV; the average stone burden was 7.8/mm; the overall stone-free rate was 75% (36/48); and the average radiation exposure time was 3.5 min. In the URS group, the operative time was 49.21 +16.09 min; the average stone burden was 10.81mm; the overall stone-free rate was 97.5% (117/120); the average hospital stay was 3.99 days; and the average radiation exposure time was 0.75 min. In the OSS group, the operative time was 112.38 +37.1 min; the overall stone-free rate was 100% (22/22); and the average hospital stay was 9.74 days.

CONCLUSION

In the management of patients with lower ureteral stones, URS, SWL and OSS were considered acceptable treatment options. This recommendation was based on the stone-free results, morbidity and retreatment rates for each therapy.

摘要

目的

探讨当前输尿管下段结石治疗的理念。

材料与方法

2008年10月至2010年11月,190例不同年龄、性别的输尿管下段结石患者接受了原位体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)(48例)、输尿管镜检查(URS)(120例)和开放性取石手术(OSS)(22例)。回顾了患者的临床和影像学检查结果以及结石特征,并与结石清除情况进行了关联分析。

结果

ESWL组手术时间为43.13 +22.5分钟;平均每位患者治疗次数为1.5次;平均每位患者接受冲击波次数为4500次;平均能量为16.5 kV;平均结石负荷为7.8/mm;总体结石清除率为75%(36/48);平均辐射暴露时间为3.5分钟。URS组手术时间为49.21 +16.09分钟;平均结石负荷为10.81mm;总体结石清除率为97.5%(117/120);平均住院时间为3.99天;平均辐射暴露时间为0.75分钟。OSS组手术时间为112.38 +37.1分钟;总体结石清除率为100%(22/22);平均住院时间为9.74天。

结论

在输尿管下段结石患者的治疗中,URS、ESWL和OSS均被认为是可接受的治疗选择。这一建议基于每种治疗方法的结石清除结果、发病率和再次治疗率。

相似文献

1
Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study.
Cent European J Urol. 2014;66(4):456-62. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2013.04.art19. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
4
Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(6):898-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10961.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
6
Ureteral stones: SWL treatment.
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011 Mar;83(1):10-3.

引用本文的文献

2
Large impacted distal ureteric stones are treated better by URS: putting priorities.
Cent European J Urol. 2014;66(4):465. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2013.04.art21.
3
URS versus ESWL: another contribution to the never-ending debate.
Cent European J Urol. 2014;66(4):463-4. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2013.04.art20.

本文引用的文献

1
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success.
Arab J Urol. 2011 Mar;9(1):35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 May 6.
3
Comparative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for proximal and distal ureteric stones.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(1):23-9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-007-9214-x. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
7
The management of ureteric colic.
Curr Opin Urol. 2006 Mar;16(2):71-6. doi: 10.1097/01.mou.0000193381.93608.dc.
8
Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):941-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.011.
9
Management of ureteric stones.
Eur Urol. 2004 Jun;45(6):714-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.10.018.
10
An update on ureteroscopic instrumentation for the treatment of urolithiasis.
Curr Opin Urol. 2004 Mar;14(2):99-106. doi: 10.1097/00042307-200403000-00009.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验