• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“延长生命岁月”(PLINY)电话友谊小组研究:初步随机对照试验

'Putting Life in Years' (PLINY) telephone friendship groups research study: pilot randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Mountain Gail A, Hind Daniel, Gossage-Worrall Rebecca, Walters Stephen J, Duncan Rosie, Newbould Louise, Rex Saleema, Jones Carys, Bowling Ann, Cattan Mima, Cairns Angela, Cooper Cindy, Edwards Rhiannon Tudor, Goyder Elizabeth C

机构信息

Clinical Trials Research Unit, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2014 Apr 24;15:141. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-141.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-15-141
PMID:24758530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4022155/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Loneliness in older people is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We undertook a parallel-group randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone befriending for the maintenance of HRQoL in older people. An internal pilot tested the feasibility of the trial and intervention.

METHODS

Participants aged >74 years, with good cognitive function, living independently in one UK city were recruited through general practices and other sources, then randomised to: (1) 6 weeks of short one-to-one telephone calls, followed by 12 weeks of group telephone calls with up to six participants, led by a trained volunteer facilitator; or (2) a control group. The main trial required the recruitment of 248 participants in a 1-year accrual window, of whom 124 were to receive telephone befriending. The pilot specified three success criteria which had to be met in order to progress the main trial to completion: recruitment of 68 participants in 95 days; retention of 80% participants at 6 months; successful delivery of telephone befriending by local franchise of national charity. The primary clinical outcome was the Short Form (36) Health Instrument (SF-36) Mental Health (MH) dimension score collected by telephone 6 months following randomisation.

RESULTS

We informed 9,579 older people about the study. Seventy consenting participants were randomised to the pilot in 95 days, with 56 (80%) providing valid primary outcome data (26 intervention, 30 control). Twenty-four participants randomly allocated to the research arm actually received telephone befriending due to poor recruitment and retention of volunteer facilitators. The trial was closed early as a result. The mean 6-month SF-36 MH scores were 78 (SD 18) and 71 (SD 21) for the intervention and control groups, respectively (mean difference, 7; 95% CI, -3 to 16).

CONCLUSIONS

Recruitment and retention of participants to a definitive trial with a recruitment window of 1 year is feasible. For the voluntary sector to recruit sufficient volunteers to match demand for telephone befriending created by trial recruitment would require the study to be run in more than one major population centre, and/or involve dedicated management of volunteers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN28645428.

摘要

背景

老年人的孤独感与健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)较差有关。我们进行了一项平行组随机对照试验,以评估电话交友对维持老年人HRQoL的有效性和成本效益。一项内部预试验测试了该试验和干预措施的可行性。

方法

通过全科医疗及其他渠道招募年龄大于74岁、认知功能良好、独立生活在英国一个城市的参与者,然后将其随机分为:(1)接受6周一对一短程电话交流,随后由一名经过培训的志愿者引导员带领进行为期12周、每组最多6名参与者的小组电话交流;或(2)对照组。主要试验要求在1年的招募期内招募248名参与者,其中124名接受电话交友服务。预试验规定了三个必须满足的成功标准,以便主要试验能够顺利完成:在95天内招募68名参与者;6个月时保留80%的参与者;全国性慈善机构的当地分支机构成功提供电话交友服务。主要临床结局是随机分组6个月后通过电话收集的简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)心理健康(MH)维度得分。

结果

我们向9579名老年人介绍了这项研究。70名同意参与的参与者在95天内被随机分配到预试验组,其中56名(80%)提供了有效的主要结局数据(26名干预组,30名对照组)。由于志愿者引导员招募和留存情况不佳,随机分配到研究组的24名参与者实际接受了电话交友服务。因此,试验提前结束。干预组和对照组6个月时SF-36 MH维度的平均得分分别为78(标准差18)和71(标准差21)(平均差值为7;95%置信区间为-3至16)。

结论

在1年的招募期内为确定性试验招募和留存参与者是可行的。对于志愿部门而言,要招募足够的志愿者以满足试验招募所产生的电话交友需求,该研究需要在多个主要人口中心开展,和/或涉及对志愿者的专门管理。

试验注册

ISRCTN28645428

相似文献

1
'Putting Life in Years' (PLINY) telephone friendship groups research study: pilot randomised controlled trial.“延长生命岁月”(PLINY)电话友谊小组研究:初步随机对照试验
Trials. 2014 Apr 24;15:141. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-141.
2
3
A pilot randomised controlled trial of befriending by volunteers in people with intellectual disability and depressive symptoms.志愿者陪伴对智力残疾合并抑郁症状人群的随机对照初步试验。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021 Nov;65(11):1010-1019. doi: 10.1111/jir.12886. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
4
Behavioural activation therapy for post-stroke depression: the BEADS feasibility RCT.行为激活疗法治疗脑卒中后抑郁:BEADS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(47):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta23470.
5
Behavioural activation to prevent depression and loneliness among socially isolated older people with long-term conditions: The BASIL COVID-19 pilot randomised controlled trial.针对患有长期疾病且社会隔离的老年人的行为激活以预防抑郁和孤独感:BASIL COVID-19 先导随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Oct 12;18(10):e1003779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003779. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer study).基层医疗中抑郁症的债务咨询:一项适应性随机对照试验(DeCoDer研究)。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jun;21(35):1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta21350.
7
Layperson-Delivered Telephone-Based Behavioral Activation Among Low-Income Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The HEAL-HOA Randomized Clinical Trial.疫情期间针对低收入老年群体开展的基于电话的由非专业人员实施的行为激活治疗:HEAL-HOA 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2416767. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.16767.
8
The effects of volunteering on loneliness among lonely older adults: the HEAL-HOA dual randomised controlled trial.志愿活动对孤独老年成年人孤独感的影响:HEAL-HOA双重随机对照试验
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2025 Jan;6(1):100664. doi: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.100664. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
9
Liver resection surgery compared with thermal ablation in high surgical risk patients with colorectal liver metastases: the LAVA international RCT.肝切除术与热消融治疗结直肠癌肝转移高危患者的比较:LAVA 国际 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Apr;24(21):1-38. doi: 10.3310/hta24210.
10
Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study.抗精神病药物与心理干预及两者联合用于首发精神病青少年(MAPS):一项多中心、三臂、随机对照试验性及可行性研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;7(9):788-800. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30248-0. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), particularly the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using standardised effect size (SES): an empirical analysis.在使用标准化效应量(SES)的随机对照试验(RCT)中,对用于分析患者报告结局(PROs),特别是简短健康调查问卷36项版本(SF-36)的统计方法进行比较:一项实证分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Apr 29;23(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02373-z.
2
The Long-Lasting Effect of Multidisciplinary Interventions for Emotional and Social Loneliness in Older Community-Dwelling Individuals: A Systematic Review.多学科干预对社区居住老年人情感和社交孤独感的长期影响:一项系统综述
Nurs Rep. 2024 Dec 6;14(4):3847-3863. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040281.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: a systematic review of health promotion interventions.预防老年人的社会隔离和孤独感:健康促进干预措施的系统评价
Nurs Older People. 2005 Mar 1;17(1):40. doi: 10.7748/nop.17.1.40.s11.
2
Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review.针对老年人社交孤立的干预措施:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 15;11:647. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-647.
3
South Yorkshire Cohort: a 'cohort trials facility' study of health and weight - protocol for the recruitment phase.
Non-Exercise-Based Interventions to Support Healthy Aging in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.支持老年人健康衰老的非运动干预措施:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Gerontologist. 2024 Dec 17;65(2). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae156.
4
Digital interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness in older adults: An evidence and gap map.减少老年人社会隔离和孤独感的数字干预措施:证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;19(4):e1369. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1369. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Social Prescription Interventions Addressing Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Meta-Review Integrating On-the-Ground Resources.社会处方干预措施解决老年人的社会隔离和孤独问题:整合实地资源的元综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 17;25:e40213. doi: 10.2196/40213.
6
Interventions Associated With Reduced Loneliness and Social Isolation in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.干预措施与减少老年人的孤独感和社会隔离:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2236676. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36676.
7
The effectiveness of remote delivered intervention for loneliness reduction in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.远程干预对减少老年人孤独感的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 28;13:935544. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935544. eCollection 2022.
8
Using information and communication technology learnings to alleviate social isolation for older people during periods of mandated isolation: A review.利用信息和通信技术的学习成果缓解老年人在强制隔离期间的社会隔离:综述。
Australas J Ageing. 2022 Sep;41(3):e227-e239. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13041. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
9
Systematic Review of Efficacy of Interventions for Social Isolation of Older Adults.老年人社会隔离干预措施疗效的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 7;12:554145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.554145. eCollection 2021.
10
How do befriending interventions alleviate loneliness and social isolation among older people? A realist evaluation study.如何通过交友干预缓解老年人的孤独感和社会隔离?一项现实主义评价研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 9;16(9):e0256900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256900. eCollection 2021.
南约克郡队列研究:一项关于健康和体重的“队列试验设施”研究——招募阶段的方案。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 11;11:640. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-640.
4
"Booster" interventions to sustain increases in physical activity in middle-aged adults in deprived urban neighbourhoods: internal pilot and feasibility study."Booster" 干预措施以维持贫困城市社区中年成年人的身体活动增加:内部试点和可行性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Feb 23;11:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-129.
5
The use of telephone befriending in low level support for socially isolated older people--an evaluation.电话交友在支持社会孤立老年人方面的低层次应用——评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2011 Mar;19(2):198-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00967.x. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
6
A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness.孤独感干预措施的荟萃分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;15(3):219-66. doi: 10.1177/1088868310377394. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
7
Should we publish pilot/feasibility studies?我们应该发表试点/可行性研究吗?
Diabetes Educ. 2010 Jul-Aug;36(4):521. doi: 10.1177/0145721710379355.
8
What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy.什么是试点或可行性研究?对当前实践和社论政策的回顾。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jul 16;10:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-67.
9
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010解释与详述:平行组随机试验报告的更新指南
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869.
10
Population reach and recruitment bias in a maintenance RCT in physically active older adults.在积极运动的老年人群体中维持 RCT 的研究人群覆盖和招募偏差。
J Phys Act Health. 2010 Jan;7(1):127-35. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.1.127.