Gomes Marleide da Mota, Engelhardt Eliasz
Instituto de Neurologia Deolindo Couto, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Setor de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, Instituto de Neurologia Deolindo Couto and Instituto de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2014 Apr;72(4):318-21. doi: 10.1590/0004-282x20130229.
The main objective of this paper is to present the importance of hysteria on Babinski's oeuvre, and the conceptions of pithiatism from Babinski until the one of conversion disorder. Babinski gave a mental basis for hysteria in the place of Charcot's encephalopatic one, and several important semiotic tools to differentiate organic from hysterical manifestations based on studies from 1893-1917/8. His teachings were spread worldwide, and in Brazil they were also appreciated in the work on hysteria by Antonio Austregesilo, the first Brazilian neurology chairman. The neurobiological basis of hysteria conceived by Charcot is nowadays reappraised, and Babinski's neurosemiological contribution is everlasting. The patients believed to be hysterical, and the two outstanding neurologists, Charcot and Babinski, gave support for the development of the modern neurology.
本文的主要目的是阐述癔症在巴宾斯基著作中的重要性,以及从巴宾斯基到转换障碍概念的暗示疗法的相关概念。巴宾斯基用心理基础取代了夏科的脑病基础来解释癔症,并基于1893年至1917/18年的研究,给出了几种区分器质性与癔症性表现的重要符号学工具。他的学说传播到了世界各地,在巴西,巴西首位神经学主席安东尼奥·奥斯特雷吉西洛关于癔症的著作中也对其表示赞赏。如今,夏科所构想的癔症的神经生物学基础正在被重新评估,而巴宾斯基的神经符号学贡献是永恒的。那些被认为患有癔症的患者,以及两位杰出的神经学家夏科和巴宾斯基,为现代神经学的发展提供了支持。