Widlöcher D, Dantchev N
Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Service de Psychiatrie, INSERM U 302, Paris.
Rev Neurol (Paris). 1994 Aug-Sep;150(8-9):490-7.
Charcot's work on hysteria has always been controversial. All his attitudes, whether on the theory of the ovary, the hysteroepileptic seizure or the use of hypnosis, have always been charicatured, misunderstood and separated from the wider context of his overall approach. Rereading Charcot's works shows that he developed his approach progressively over a period of more than 20 years before coming to his psychological model of hysteria. This model explains the formation of the symptom and the hysterical conversion via a mechanism of being ignorant of the motor representation. This concept has never been disproven and remains the only theory explaining the formation of the hysteria symptom. Based on Charcot's fundamental contribution, Freud and Janet further developed their work on the psychopathology of hysteria.
夏科关于癔症的研究一直存在争议。他所有的观点，无论是关于卵巢理论、癔症癫痫发作还是催眠的应用，都总是被歪曲、误解，并且与他整体方法的更广泛背景相脱离。重新阅读夏科的著作可以发现，在形成他的癔症心理模型之前，他在20多年的时间里逐步发展了自己的方法。这个模型通过一种对运动表象无知的机制来解释症状的形成和癔症性转换。这一概念从未被推翻，仍然是解释癔症症状形成的唯一理论。基于夏科的基础性贡献，弗洛伊德和雅内进一步发展了他们关于癔症精神病理学的研究。
