• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a theoretically-based judgment and decision making intervention for adolescents.一种基于理论的青少年判断与决策干预措施的有效性。
J Youth Adolesc. 2015 May;44(5):1024-38. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0127-6. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
2
The Effectiveness of the Treatment Readiness and Induction Program (TRIP) for Improving During-Treatment Outcomes.治疗准备与诱导计划(TRIP)对改善治疗期间结果的有效性。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Mar;62:20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
3
Effectiveness of the Treatment Readiness and Induction Program for increasing adolescent motivation for change.治疗准备与诱导计划对提高青少年改变动机的有效性。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Mar;50:38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
4
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.青少年决策中的风险与理性:对理论、实践和公共政策的启示。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
5
Impact of a positive youth development program in urban after-school settings on the prevention of adolescent substance use.城市课后活动场所积极青少年发展项目对预防青少年药物使用的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2007 Sep;41(3):239-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.02.016. Epub 2007 May 3.
6
A substance use decision aid for medically at-risk adolescents: results of a randomized controlled trial for cancer-surviving adolescents.一种针对有医学风险的青少年的物质使用决策辅助工具:对癌症幸存青少年的随机对照试验结果。
Cancer Nurs. 2013 Sep-Oct;36(5):355-67. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31827910ba.
7
Bridging the gap between moral reasoning and adolescent engagement in risky behavior.弥合道德推理与青少年从事危险行为之间的差距。
J Adolesc. 2000 Aug;23(4):409-22. doi: 10.1006/jado.2000.0328.
8
Adolescents in Peer Groups Make More Prudent Decisions When a Slightly Older Adult Is Present.当一个稍微年长的成年人在场时,同伴群体中的青少年会做出更谨慎的决策。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Mar;27(3):322-30. doi: 10.1177/0956797615620379. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
9
Testing the effects of a decision-making and risk-reduction program for cancer-surviving adolescents.测试一项针对癌症幸存青少年的决策制定与风险降低计划的效果。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999 Oct;26(9):1475-86.
10
Adolescent substance use disorders and comorbidity.青少年物质使用障碍及其共病
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2002 Apr;49(2):463-77. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(01)00014-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-Making Styles as a Moderator on the Efficacy of the Tablet Intervention.决策风格对 Tablet 干预效果的调节作用。
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(9):1132-1142. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2212301. Epub 2023 May 15.
2
Quantitative Survey on Prevalence of Prescription Pain Medications and Stimulants Use in Young Adults.关于年轻成年人中处方止痛药物和兴奋剂使用流行情况的定量调查。
Subst Abuse. 2023 Apr 17;17:11782218231162827. doi: 10.1177/11782218231162827. eCollection 2023.
3
Using a Train-the-Trainer Model to Promote Practice Change among Agencies Serving Justice-Involved Youth.采用培训培训师模式促进为涉司法青少年提供服务的机构的实践变革。
Fed Probat. 2019 Dec;83(3):47-53.
4
An evaluation of StaySafe, a tablet app to improve health risk decision-making among people under community supervision.评估 StaySafe,一款用于改善社区监管下人群健康风险决策的平板电脑应用程序。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Nov;130:108480. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108480. Epub 2021 May 14.
5
THE IOWA GAMBLING TASK IN VIOLENT AND NONVIOLENT INCARCERATED MALE ADOLESCENTS.暴力与非暴力监禁男性青少年的爱荷华赌博任务
Crim Justice Behav. 2019 Nov 1;46(11):1611-1629. doi: 10.1177/0093854819847707. Epub 2019 May 12.
6
: A self-administered android tablet application for helping individuals on probation make better decisions pertaining to health risk behaviors.一款供缓刑人员自行使用的安卓平板电脑应用程序,用于帮助他们在健康风险行为方面做出更好的决策。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Mar 31;10:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.03.010. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
The Effectiveness of the Treatment Readiness and Induction Program (TRIP) for Improving During-Treatment Outcomes.治疗准备与诱导计划(TRIP)对改善治疗期间结果的有效性。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Mar;62:20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
8
Effectiveness of the Treatment Readiness and Induction Program for increasing adolescent motivation for change.治疗准备与诱导计划对提高青少年改变动机的有效性。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Mar;50:38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

1
To Stay or Not To Stay: Adolescent Client, Parent, and Counselor Perspectives on Leaving Substance Abuse Treatment Early.留还是不留:青少年来访者、家长及咨询师对提前终止药物滥用治疗的看法
J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2015;24(6):344-354. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2013.844088. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
2
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.青少年决策中的风险与理性:对理论、实践和公共政策的启示。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
3
Screening and assessment tools for measuring adolescent client needs and functioning in substance abuse treatment.用于测量青少年患者在物质滥用治疗中的需求和功能的筛查和评估工具。
Subst Use Misuse. 2014 Jun;49(7):902-18. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2014.891617. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
4
Improving Adolescent Judgment and Decision Making.提高青少年的判断力和决策能力。
Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2013;44(4). doi: 10.1037/a0032495.
5
Recovery among adolescents: models for post-treatment gains in drug abuse treatments.青少年的康复:药物滥用治疗后获得收益的模型。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Mar;46(3):362-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
6
Gender and racial differences in treatment process and outcome among participants in the adolescent community reinforcement approach.青少年社区强化治疗参与者中治疗过程和结果的性别和种族差异。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 Mar;25(1):143-54. doi: 10.1037/a0022179.
7
Sex differences in impulsivity: a meta-analysis.冲动的性别差异:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Jan;137(1):97-130. doi: 10.1037/a0021591.
8
Prefrontal cortex and drug abuse vulnerability: translation to prevention and treatment interventions.前额叶皮层与药物滥用易感性:向预防和治疗干预的转化
Brain Res Rev. 2011 Jan 1;65(2):124-49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.09.001. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
9
Enhancing adolescent substance abuse treatment engagement.提高青少年药物滥用治疗的参与度。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2008 Jun;40(2):173-82. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2008.10400628.
10
Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: a review of the literature.女性药物滥用治疗的入院、留存率及治疗效果:文献综述
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Jan 5;86(1):1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.05.012. Epub 2006 Jun 8.

一种基于理论的青少年判断与决策干预措施的有效性。

Effectiveness of a theoretically-based judgment and decision making intervention for adolescents.

作者信息

Knight Danica K, Dansereau Donald F, Becan Jennifer E, Rowan Grace A, Flynn Patrick M

机构信息

Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University (TCU), Box 298740, Fort Worth, TX, 76129, USA,

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2015 May;44(5):1024-38. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0127-6. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10964-014-0127-6
PMID:24760288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4208977/
Abstract

Although adolescents demonstrate capacity for rational decision making, their tendency to be impulsive, place emphasis on peers, and ignore potential consequences of their actions often translates into higher risk-taking including drug use, illegal activity, and physical harm. Problems with judgment and decision making contribute to risky behavior and are core issues for youth in treatment. Based on theoretical and empirical advances in cognitive science, the Treatment Readiness and Induction Program (TRIP) represents a curriculum-based decision making intervention that can be easily inserted into a variety of content-oriented modalities as well as administered as a separate therapeutic course. The current study examined the effectiveness of TRIP for promoting better judgment among 519 adolescents (37 % female; primarily Hispanic and Caucasian) in residential substance abuse treatment. Change over time in decision making and premeditation (i.e., thinking before acting) was compared among youth receiving standard operating practice (n = 281) versus those receiving standard practice plus TRIP (n = 238). Change in TRIP-specific content knowledge was examined among clients receiving TRIP. Premeditation improved among youth in both groups; TRIP clients showed greater improvement in decision making. TRIP clients also reported significant increases over time in self-awareness, positive-focused thinking (e.g., positive self-talk, goal setting), and recognition of the negative effects of drug use. While both genders showed significant improvement, males showed greater gains in metacognitive strategies (i.e., awareness of one's own cognitive process) and recognition of the negative effects of drug use. These results suggest that efforts to teach core thinking strategies and apply/practice them through independent intervention modules may benefit adolescents when used in conjunction with content-based programs designed to change problematic behaviors.

摘要

尽管青少年表现出理性决策的能力,但他们冲动的倾向、对同伴的重视以及对自身行为潜在后果的忽视,往往导致更高的风险行为,包括吸毒、违法活动和身体伤害。判断和决策问题导致了危险行为,是接受治疗的青少年的核心问题。基于认知科学的理论和实证进展,治疗准备与诱导项目(TRIP)是一种基于课程的决策干预措施,它可以很容易地融入各种以内容为导向的模式中,也可以作为一门单独的治疗课程来实施。本研究考察了TRIP在促进519名接受住院药物滥用治疗的青少年(37%为女性;主要是西班牙裔和白种人)做出更好判断方面的有效性。比较了接受标准操作流程的青少年(n = 281)和接受标准操作流程加TRIP的青少年(n = 238)在决策和预谋(即行动前思考)方面随时间的变化。对接受TRIP的客户的特定于TRIP的内容知识变化进行了考察。两组青少年的预谋能力都有所提高;接受TRIP的客户在决策方面有更大的改善。接受TRIP的客户还报告说,随着时间的推移,他们的自我意识、积极思维(如积极的自我对话、目标设定)以及对吸毒负面影响的认识都有显著提高。虽然两性都有显著改善,但男性在元认知策略(即对自己认知过程的意识)和对吸毒负面影响的认识方面有更大的进步。这些结果表明,通过独立的干预模块来教授核心思维策略并加以应用/实践的努力,在与旨在改变问题行为的基于内容的项目结合使用时,可能会使青少年受益。