84 Tomahawk Trail, St. Helena Island, SC 29920.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 May;20(5):455-66b. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.5.455.
Approaches to pain management are diverse, requiring prescribers to evaluate an array of clinical issues and potential solutions. In addition to the difficult task of selecting a treatment option, pain treatment may be further complicated by multiple prescribers, multiple medications, and multiple mechanisms of pain origination.
To describe patient demographics (e.g., age, gender); comorbidities; office visits (e.g., physician, chiropractor, physical therapy, psychiatry, allergist); number of different prescribers overall prescription use; pain medications as classified by the World Health Organization's (WHO) pain ladder; adjuvant medications; nonpharmacologic procedures; and potential drug interactions in a broad sample of patients with nociceptive or neuropathic neck or back diagnoses, or osteoarthritis diagnoses, in a commercial population.
This claims-data analysis used a cross-sectional cohort comparison with a fixed 2-year observation period from September 1, 2006, to August 31, 2008, for patients in the PharMetrics national managed care database. The assigned cohorts were neuropathic-related neck/back diagnoses (NEURO); neuropathic and nociceptive neck/back diagnoses (NEURO/NOCI); nociceptive neck/back diagnoses without a neuropathic-related diagnosis (NOCI); and only osteoarthritis (OA) diagnoses. All analyses were conducted by cohort. The analysis included the following patient-descriptive variables: patient demographics, comorbidities, office visits, most frequent medical providers and number of different prescribers, all medications, pain medications as classified by the WHO pain ladder, adjuvant medications, adjuvant procedures and potential drug interactions. The goal for selecting these variables was to describe a range of data that might provide insight into the complexity of pain management decisions faced by clinicians.
The study included 85,014 patients, classified as NEURO (n = 2,375), NEURO/NOCI (n = 37,019), NOCI (n = 39,496), and OA (n = 6,124). The most frequently occurring comorbidities (observed in > 40% of patients) included cardiovascular and neuropathic pain conditions. Considering all types of medication claims observed among all cohorts, the overall mean prescription claim count for the 2-year observation period was 57.9 claims (standard deviation 56.2). Weak opioids (WHO pain relief ladder rung 2) accounted for the majority of pain medication claims across all cohorts. Across cohorts, 25.7% of patients had 10 or more days of overlapping drug availability (for inducers or inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 system concomitantly), a measure of potential for drug interactions.
Choosing the appropriate pain treatment involves assessing currently used medications for existing illnesses and deciding on the appropriate types of pain medications. However, potentially serious drug-drug interactions are a consequence of multiple drug use, and such a potential requires thoughtful consideration by those involved in patient care.
疼痛管理方法多种多样,要求医生评估一系列临床问题和潜在的解决方案。除了选择治疗方案这一艰巨任务外,疼痛治疗还可能因多名医生、多种药物和多种疼痛起源机制而变得更加复杂。
描述患者人口统计学特征(如年龄、性别);合并症;就诊情况(如医生、脊椎按摩师、物理治疗师、精神科医生、过敏症医生);总体处方使用的不同医生数量;世界卫生组织(WHO)疼痛阶梯分类的疼痛药物;辅助药物;非药物治疗程序;以及在商业人群中患有感觉神经性或神经性颈部或背部诊断或骨关节炎诊断的广泛患者样本中的潜在药物相互作用。
本项基于索赔数据的分析使用了一个横截面队列比较,在 PharMetrics 全国管理式医疗数据库中,将 2006 年 9 月 1 日至 2008 年 8 月 31 日作为固定的 2 年观察期。分配的队列为神经性相关的颈/背部诊断(NEURO);神经性和感觉神经性颈/背部诊断(NEURO/NOCI);无神经性相关诊断的感觉神经性颈/背部诊断(NOCI);和仅骨关节炎(OA)诊断。所有分析均按队列进行。分析包括以下患者描述性变量:患者人口统计学特征、合并症、就诊情况、最常就诊的医疗服务提供者和不同医生数量、所有药物、WHO 疼痛阶梯分类的疼痛药物、辅助药物、辅助治疗程序和潜在药物相互作用。选择这些变量的目的是描述可能为临床医生面临的疼痛管理决策提供深入了解的一系列数据。
该研究纳入了 85014 名患者,分为 NEURO(n=2375)、NEURO/NOCI(n=37019)、NOCI(n=39496)和 OA(n=6124)。最常见的合并症(>40%的患者存在)包括心血管和神经性疼痛病症。考虑到所有队列中观察到的所有类型的药物索赔,2 年观察期的总体平均处方索赔数为 57.9 次(标准偏差 56.2)。弱阿片类药物(WHO 疼痛缓解阶梯第 2 级)在所有队列中均占疼痛药物索赔的大部分。在所有队列中,25.7%的患者有 10 天或以上重叠的药物可用性(同时诱导或抑制细胞色素 P450 系统),这是潜在药物相互作用的一个衡量标准。
选择合适的疼痛治疗方法涉及评估当前用于治疗现有疾病的药物,并决定适当类型的疼痛药物。然而,潜在的严重药物相互作用是多种药物使用的后果,这需要参与患者护理的人员进行深思熟虑的考虑。