Suppr超能文献

使用行为评估和感觉检查区分慢性下腰痛中的伤害性和神经性成分。

Distinguishing between nociceptive and neuropathic components in chronic low back pain using behavioural evaluation and sensory examination.

作者信息

Spahr N, Hodkinson D, Jolly K, Williams S, Howard M, Thacker M

机构信息

Dept. of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Dept. of Physiotherapy, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Dept. of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Feb;27:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of chronic low back pain (CLBP) is traditionally predicated on identifying underlying pathological or anatomical causes, with treatment outcomes modest at best. Alternately, it is suggested that identification of underlying pain mechanisms with treatments targeted towards specific pain phenotypes may yield more success. Differentiation between nociceptive and neuropathic components of CLBP is problematic; evidence suggests that clinicians fail to identify a significant neuropathic component in many CLBP patients. The painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ) was specifically developed to identify occult but significant neuropathic components in individuals thought to have predominantly nociceptive pain.

METHODS

Using the PDQ, we classified 50 CLBP patients into two distinct groups; those with predominantly nociceptive pain (Group 1) and those with a significant neuropathic component (Group 2). We characterised these two distinct CLBP sub-groups using a) questionnaire-based behavioural evaluation measuring pain-related function and quality of life, pain intensity and psychological well-being and b) sensory examination, using two-point and tactile threshold discrimination.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if differences in the pain phenotype of each CLBP sub-group would be reflected in sensory and behavioural group profiles.

RESULTS

We report that Group 1 and Group 2 sub-groups demonstrate unique clinical profiles with significant differences in sensory tactile discrimination thresholds and in a wide range of behavioural domains measuring pain intensity, disability and psychological well-being.

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated distinct clinical profiles for CLBP patient sub-groups classified by PDQ. Our results give diagnostic confidence in using the PDQ to characterise two distinct pain phenotypes in a heterogeneous CLBP population.

摘要

背景

慢性下腰痛(CLBP)的诊断传统上基于识别潜在的病理或解剖学原因,但其治疗效果充其量只能说是一般。另一种观点认为,识别潜在的疼痛机制并针对特定疼痛表型进行治疗可能会取得更大的成功。区分CLBP的伤害性和神经性成分存在问题;有证据表明,临床医生在许多CLBP患者中未能识别出显著的神经性成分。疼痛DETECT问卷(PDQ)专门用于识别被认为主要患有伤害性疼痛的个体中隐匿但显著的神经性成分。

方法

我们使用PDQ将50名CLBP患者分为两个不同的组;主要患有伤害性疼痛的患者(第1组)和具有显著神经性成分的患者(第2组)。我们通过以下方式对这两个不同的CLBP亚组进行特征描述:a)基于问卷的行为评估,测量与疼痛相关的功能和生活质量、疼痛强度和心理健康;b)感觉检查,使用两点辨别和触觉阈值辨别。

目的

我们试图确定每个CLBP亚组疼痛表型的差异是否会反映在感觉和行为组特征中。

结果

我们报告第1组和第2组亚组表现出独特的临床特征,在感觉触觉辨别阈值以及测量疼痛强度、残疾和心理健康的广泛行为领域存在显著差异。

结论

我们已经证明了通过PDQ分类的CLBP患者亚组具有不同的临床特征。我们的结果为使用PDQ来表征异质性CLBP人群中的两种不同疼痛表型提供了诊断信心。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验