Marcus Autism Center and Georgia State University.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Summer;47(2):277-92. doi: 10.1002/jaba.110. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
Results of previous research indicate that the delivery of positive reinforcement (e.g., food) for an appropriate, alternative target response (e.g., compliance) or delivery of food on a time-based schedule can decrease problem behavior reinforced by escape, even when problem behavior continues to produce negative reinforcement (e.g., Lalli et al., ; Lomas, Fisher, & Kelley, ). In this study, we compared the levels of both compliance and problem behavior when food and praise were delivered either contingent on compliance or on a time-based schedule. Results for 3 of the 4 participants showed that contingent delivery of preferred edible items and praise was more effective in both reducing problem behavior and increasing compliance compared to variable-time delivery of these same items. These findings are discussed in the context of motivating operations and competition between positive and negative reinforcement.
先前的研究结果表明,为适当的替代目标反应(例如,遵从)提供正强化(例如,食物),或者按照时间安排提供食物,可以减少由逃避强化的问题行为,即使问题行为继续产生负强化(例如,Lalli 等人,;Lomas、Fisher 和 Kelley,)。在这项研究中,我们比较了在服从或基于时间的时间表上提供食物和表扬时,服从和问题行为的水平。对于 4 名参与者中的 3 名,结果表明,与这些相同物品的可变时间交付相比,有条件地交付首选可食用物品和表扬更有效地减少问题行为并提高遵从性。这些发现是在激励操作和正负强化之间的竞争的背景下讨论的。