Suppr超能文献

用于治疗严重问题行为的非连续性强化:对连续27例应用的分析

Noncontingent reinforcement for the treatment of severe problem behavior: An analysis of 27 consecutive applications.

作者信息

Phillips Cara L, Iannaccone Julia A, Rooker Griffin W, Hagopian Louis P

机构信息

The Kennedy Krieger Institute.

The Kennedy Krieger Institute and the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Apr;50(2):357-376. doi: 10.1002/jaba.376. Epub 2017 Feb 8.

Abstract

Noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) is a commonly used treatment for severe problem behavior displayed by individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The current study sought to extend the literature by reporting outcomes achieved with 27 consecutive applications of NCR as the primary treatment for severe problem behavior. All applications of NCR were included regardless of treatment outcome to minimize selection bias favoring successful cases. Participants ranged in age from 5 to 33 years. We analyzed the results across behavioral function and with regard to the use of functional versus alternative reinforcers. NCR effectively treated problem behavior maintained by social reinforcement in 14 of 15 applications, using either the functional reinforcer or alternative reinforcers. When we implemented NCR to treat problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement, we often had to add other treatment components to produce clinically significant effects (five of nine applications). Results provide information on the effectiveness and limitations of NCR as treatment for severe problem behavior.

摘要

非连续性强化(NCR)是治疗智力和发育障碍个体所表现出的严重问题行为的一种常用方法。本研究旨在通过报告连续27次将NCR作为严重问题行为的主要治疗方法所取得的结果来扩展相关文献。纳入了NCR的所有应用情况,无论治疗结果如何,以尽量减少有利于成功案例的选择偏差。参与者年龄在5至33岁之间。我们分析了行为功能方面的结果以及功能性强化物与替代性强化物的使用情况。在15次应用中,有14次使用功能性强化物或替代性强化物,NCR有效地治疗了由社会强化维持的问题行为。当我们实施NCR来治疗由自动强化维持的问题行为时,我们常常不得不添加其他治疗成分以产生临床显著效果(9次应用中有5次)。研究结果提供了有关NCR作为严重问题行为治疗方法的有效性和局限性的信息。

相似文献

1
Noncontingent reinforcement for the treatment of severe problem behavior: An analysis of 27 consecutive applications.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Apr;50(2):357-376. doi: 10.1002/jaba.376. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
2
Noncontingent reinforcement: Arbitrary versus maintaining reinforcers for escape-maintained problem behavior.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Jun;54(3):984-1000. doi: 10.1002/jaba.821. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Spring;30(1):127-36; quiz 136-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-127.
4
Effects of alternative responses on behavior exposed to noncontingent reinforcement.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;46(3):603-12. doi: 10.1002/jaba.61. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
5
A variation of noncontingent reinforcement in the treatment of aberrant behavior.
Res Dev Disabil. 2000 Nov-Dec;21(6):425-35. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(00)00056-1.
9
Modeling the effects of sensory reinforcers on behavioral persistence with alternative reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Sep;102(2):252-66. doi: 10.1002/jeab.103. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
10
Noncontingent reinforcement: a further examination of schedule effects during treatment.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):709-19. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-709.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Artificial Intelligence on the Efficacy of Preference Assessments for Preservice Speech-Language Pathologists.
J Dev Phys Disabil. 2025;37(4):673-705. doi: 10.1007/s10882-024-09976-2. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
2
The Development of a Behavior Plan Quality Assurance Instrument in a Publicly Funded System of Care.
Behav Anal Pract. 2024 Feb 8;18(2):349-364. doi: 10.1007/s40617-024-00909-1. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
A scoping review of consecutive controlled case series studies.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2025 Apr;58(2):270-286. doi: 10.1002/jaba.70006. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
4
Understanding and Reacting to Relapse: Considerations for Practitioners.
Behav Anal Pract. 2024 Oct 15;18(1):34-55. doi: 10.1007/s40617-024-00997-z. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
The Need to Distinguish between "Lapse" and "Relapse".
Perspect Behav Sci. 2025 Feb 14;48(1):115-132. doi: 10.1007/s40614-025-00436-6. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Approaches for Treating Multiply Controlled Problem Behavior.
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Sep 21;17(1):53-69. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00858-1. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
A replication and extension of the augmented competing stimulus assessment.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023;56(4):869-883. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1009. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
9
Additional Comments on the Use of Contingent Electric Skin Shock.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2023 Jun 6;46(2):339-348. doi: 10.1007/s40614-023-00382-1. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Report of the ABAI Task Force on Contingent Electric Skin Shock.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2023 Jun 15;46(2):261-304. doi: 10.1007/s40614-023-00379-w. eCollection 2023 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Caregiver preference for reinforcement-based interventions for problem behavior maintained by positive reinforcement.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Jun;49(2):215-27. doi: 10.1002/jaba.286. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
2
Functional communication training during reinforcement schedule thinning: An analysis of 25 applications.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Mar;49(1):105-21. doi: 10.1002/jaba.265. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
3
Delineating subtypes of self-injurious behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Sep;48(3):523-43. doi: 10.1002/jaba.236. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
4
Meta-analysis of noncontingent reinforcement effects on problem behavior.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):131-52. doi: 10.1002/jaba.189.
5
Publication bias in studies of an applied behavior-analytic intervention: an initial analysis.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Fall;47(3):663-78. doi: 10.1002/jaba.146. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
6
The effects of variable-time versus contingent reinforcement delivery on problem behavior maintained by escape.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Summer;47(2):277-92. doi: 10.1002/jaba.110. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
7
Caregiver- and staff-conducted functional analysis outcomes: a summary of 52 cases.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Dec;46(4):738-49. doi: 10.1002/jaba.87. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
9
Effects of alternative responses on behavior exposed to noncontingent reinforcement.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;46(3):603-12. doi: 10.1002/jaba.61. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
10
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 5;8(7):e66844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066844. Print 2013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验