• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期适当干预(包括使用抗生素和伤口护理)对左心室辅助装置患者器械相关感染的重要性。

Importance of early appropriate intervention including antibiotics and wound care for device-related infection in patients with left ventricular assist device.

作者信息

Hieda M, Sata M, Seguchi O, Yanase M, Murata Y, Sato T, Sunami H, Nakajima S, Watanabe T, Hori Y, Wada K, Hata H, Fujita T, Kobayashi J, Nakatani T

机构信息

Department of Transplantation, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Pulmonology and Infection Control, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2014 Apr;46(3):907-10. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.11.106.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.11.106
PMID:24767378
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is essential for treating patients with advanced heart failure. However, LVAD-related infection is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity, with bloodstream infection (BSI) especially associated with high mortality. We investigated the incidence of infectious complications in patients who received an LVAD and evaluated the effects of early and appropriate intervention for LVAD-related infection.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed 27 consecutive patients who underwent continuous-flow LVAD (CF-LVAD; n = 16) or pulsatile-flow LVAD (PF-LVAD; n = 11) implantation at the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center between April 2011 and March 2013. Incidences of LVAD-related infections, such as drive-line infection in patients with CF-LVAD, cannula infection in patients with PF-LVAD, and BSI in patients with both types, were examined (follow-up period, 342 ± 229 days). The mandatory antibiotic prophylaxis protocol at our institution includes teicoplanin (400 mg) 2 days before LVAD implantation and doripenem (1000 mg) within 1 hour of skin incision. In addition, the driveline exit sites undergo sterile cleansing with diluted hydrogen peroxide and placement of an antimicrobial occlusive dressing for wound care, with dressing changes performed 2-3 times per day.

RESULTS

More than 90% of all patients suffered from a drive-line infection within 12 months after LVAD implantation. However, BSI developed in only 12.5% of CF-LVAD and 10% of PF-LVAD patients within 12 months (log-rank test; P = .875).

CONCLUSIONS

LVAD-related infections, such as drive-line and cannula infections, were common, whereas the incidence of BSI was low in our LVAD-implanted patients. Our results highlight the importance of early and appropriate intervention including antibiotics and wound care for device-related infections for reducing the incidence of potentially fatal BSI.

摘要

引言

左心室辅助装置(LVAD)对于治疗晚期心力衰竭患者至关重要。然而,LVAD相关感染是导致死亡率和发病率的重要原因,血流感染(BSI)尤其与高死亡率相关。我们调查了接受LVAD治疗的患者感染并发症的发生率,并评估了对LVAD相关感染进行早期和适当干预的效果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2011年4月至2013年3月期间在国立脑神经与心血管中心连续接受连续流LVAD(CF-LVAD;n = 16)或搏动流LVAD(PF-LVAD;n = 11)植入的27例患者。检查了LVAD相关感染的发生率,如CF-LVAD患者的驱动线感染、PF-LVAD患者的插管感染以及两种类型患者的BSI(随访期为342±229天)。我们机构的强制性抗生素预防方案包括在LVAD植入前2天使用替考拉宁(400mg)以及在皮肤切开后1小时内使用多利培南(1000mg)。此外,驱动线出口部位用稀释的过氧化氢进行无菌清洁,并放置抗菌封闭敷料进行伤口护理,每天更换敷料2 - 3次。

结果

超过90%的患者在LVAD植入后12个月内发生了驱动线感染。然而,在12个月内,只有12.5%的CF-LVAD患者和10%的PF-LVAD患者发生了BSI(对数秩检验;P = 0.875)。

结论

LVAD相关感染,如驱动线和插管感染很常见,而在我们接受LVAD植入的患者中BSI的发生率较低。我们的结果强调了早期和适当干预(包括抗生素和伤口护理)对于减少潜在致命性BSI发生率的设备相关感染的重要性。

相似文献

1
Importance of early appropriate intervention including antibiotics and wound care for device-related infection in patients with left ventricular assist device.早期适当干预(包括使用抗生素和伤口护理)对左心室辅助装置患者器械相关感染的重要性。
Transplant Proc. 2014 Apr;46(3):907-10. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.11.106.
2
Infectious complications in patients with left ventricular assist device: etiology and outcomes in the continuous-flow era.左心室辅助装置患者的感染性并发症:连续流时代的病因和结局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Oct;90(4):1270-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.093.
3
Left ventricular assist device-related infection: treatment and outcome.左心室辅助装置相关感染:治疗与结局
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Apr 15;40(8):1108-15. doi: 10.1086/428728. Epub 2005 Mar 11.
4
Infectious complications after pulsatile-flow and continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.脉冲流和连续流左心室辅助装置植入术后的感染并发症。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Feb;30(2):164-74. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.08.003.
5
Left ventricular assist device-related infections: a multicentric study.左心室辅助装置相关感染:一项多中心研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Oct;23(10):748-751. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
6
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.心脏移植后使用持续血流左心室辅助装置的生存情况:左心室辅助装置支持时间和其他变量的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5.
7
Implantable LVAD infections: implications for permanent use of the device.植入式左心室辅助装置感染:对该装置长期使用的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jan;61(1):359-65; discussion 372-3. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00990-6.
8
Prevention of percutaneous driveline infection after left ventricular assist device implantation: prophylactic antibiotics are not necessary.预防左心室辅助装置植入术后经皮导管感染:预防性使用抗生素并非必要。
ASAIO J. 2013 Nov-Dec;59(6):570-4. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182a9e2a5.
9
Left ventricular assist device driveline infections.左心室辅助装置的驱动线感染。
Cardiol Clin. 2011 Nov;29(4):515-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2011.08.004.
10
The influence of infection on survival and successful transplantation in patients with left ventricular assist devices.感染对左心室辅助装置患者生存及移植成功的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997 Aug;16(8):822-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Colonization with Multidrug-resistant Organisms in Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices.患者携带耐多药生物体与心室辅助设备的定植关系。
ASAIO J. 2022 Aug 1;68(8):1048-1053. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001634. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
2
Driveline exit-site care protocols in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review.左心室辅助装置患者的外接管出口部位护理方案:系统评价。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep 11;60(3):506-515. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab195.
3
Wound care of the driveline exit site in patients with a ventricular assist device: A systematic review.
心室辅助装置患者驱动线出口部位的伤口护理:一项系统综述。
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2018 Apr 30;26(2):328-335. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.14982. eCollection 2018 Apr.
4
Epidemiology of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections: Findings From a Large Nonregistry Cohort.左心室辅助装置感染的流行病学:来自大型非注册队列的研究结果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 27;72(2):190-197. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa011.
5
2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support.2019 年 EACTS 专家共识:长期机械循环支持
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Aug 1;56(2):230-270. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz098.
6
Driveline angle is crucial for preventing driveline infection in patients with HeartMate II device.传动系统角度对于预防使用HeartMate II设备的患者发生传动系统感染至关重要。
J Artif Organs. 2019 Mar;22(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s10047-018-1074-x. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
7
Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections: A Systematic Review.左心室辅助装置感染:系统评价。
ASAIO J. 2018 May/Jun;64(3):287-294. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000684.
8
The Importance of the Management of Infectious Complications for Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device.左心室辅助装置患者感染并发症管理的重要性
Healthcare (Basel). 2015 Aug 26;3(3):750-6. doi: 10.3390/healthcare3030750.
9
Readmission due to driveline infection can be predicted by new score by using serum albumin and body mass index during long-term left ventricular assist device support.在长期左心室辅助装置支持期间,通过使用血清白蛋白和体重指数的新评分可以预测因驱动线感染导致的再次入院情况。
J Artif Organs. 2015 Jun;18(2):120-7. doi: 10.1007/s10047-015-0816-2. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
10
Technique for minimizing and treating driveline infections.减少和治疗动力线感染的技术。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Nov;3(6):557-62. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.09.08.