减少和治疗动力线感染的技术。
Technique for minimizing and treating driveline infections.
作者信息
Yarboro Leora T, Bergin James D, Kennedy Jamie L W, Ballew Carole C, Benton Emily M, Ailawadi Gorav, Kern John A
机构信息
1 Department of Surgery, 2 Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
出版信息
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Nov;3(6):557-62. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.09.08.
Abstract
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly utilized in the management of advanced heart failure. A transcutaneous driveline is necessary to power the LVAD, and although this technology has improved over the years in terms of smaller size and increased durability, driveline complications continue to develop in up to 20% of all devices implanted. Driveline infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. As more patients live longer with ventricular assist devices, minimizing driveline infections is paramount. A systematic, multidisciplinary approach can be used to develop a strategy to prevent, recognize and treat driveline infections. In this paper, we describe our approach to driveline management which has resulted in zero driveline infections between January 2012 and March 2014.
摘要
左心室辅助装置（LVADs）在晚期心力衰竭的治疗中应用越来越广泛。经皮驱动线是LVAD供电所必需的，尽管多年来这项技术在尺寸变小和耐用性增强方面有所改进，但高达20%的植入装置仍会出现驱动线并发症。驱动线感染与严重的发病率和死亡率相关。随着越来越多的患者使用心室辅助装置存活更长时间，将驱动线感染降至最低至关重要。可以采用系统的多学科方法来制定预防、识别和治疗驱动线感染的策略。在本文中，我们描述了我们的驱动线管理方法，该方法在2012年1月至2014年3月期间实现了零驱动线感染。
相似文献
1
Technique for minimizing and treating driveline infections.减少和治疗动力线感染的技术。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Nov;3(6):557-62. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.09.08.
2
In Full Flow: Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections in the Modern Era.全面解析：现代左心室辅助装置感染
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 17;7(5):ofaa124. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa124. eCollection 2020 May.
3
Prevention and early treatment of driveline infections in ventricular assist device patients - The DESTINE staging proposal and the first standard of care protocol.预防和早期治疗心室辅助装置患者的移植物感染——DESTINE 分期建议和首个标准治疗方案。
J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:106-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.014. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
4
Durability of left ventricular assist devices: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 2006 to 2011.左心室辅助装置的耐久性：机械循环辅助机构注册研究（INTERMACS）2006 年至 2011 年。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;146(2):437-41.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
5
Risk of left ventricular assist device driveline infection: A systematic literature review.左心室辅助装置驱动线感染的风险：系统文献回顾。
Heart Lung. 2019 Mar-Apr;48(2):90-104. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
6
[Driveline Wound Care: Key to the Long-Term Use of Implantable Ventricular Assist Devices].[驱动线伤口护理：植入式心室辅助装置长期使用的关键]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2019 Aug;66(4):87-94. doi: 10.6224/JN.201908_66(4).11.
7
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for an ascending colon cancer patient with an implantable left ventricular assist device: a case report.为一名植入左心室辅助装置的升结肠癌患者实施腹腔镜右半结肠切除术：病例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2020 Nov 9;6(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s40792-020-01064-9.
8
Late-onset driveline infections: the Achilles' heel of prolonged left ventricular assist device support.迟发性传动系统感染：长期左心室辅助装置支持的致命弱点。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Aug;84(2):515-20. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.085.
9
Reduction of driveline infections through doubled driveline tunneling of left ventricular assist devices-5-year follow-up.通过将左心室辅助装置的驱动线隧道加倍减少驱动线感染——5年随访
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(Suppl 15):S1703-S1710. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.127.
10
Correlation between driveline features and driveline infection in left ventricular assist device selection.左心室辅助装置选择中传动系统特征与传动系统感染之间的相关性
J Artif Organs. 2017 Mar;20(1):34-41. doi: 10.1007/s10047-016-0923-8. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
引用本文的文献
1
Driveline Relocation and Vacuum-Assisted Closure for Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections.心室辅助装置驱动线感染的驱动线重新定位及负压封闭引流术
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jun 3;12(6):211. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12060211.
2
Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Nosocomial Infections in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients.左心室辅助装置接受者医院感染的流行病学及危险因素
Life (Basel). 2024 Feb 17;14(2):270. doi: 10.3390/life14020270.
3
A Tunable Soft Silicone Bioadhesive for Secure Anchoring of Diverse Medical Devices to Wet Biological Tissue.一种可调软硅胶生物粘合剂，用于将各种医疗设备安全固定在湿润的生物组织上。
Adv Mater. 2024 Jan;36(3):e2307288. doi: 10.1002/adma.202307288. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
4
Driveline erosion of the colon as a late complication of LVAD implantation.作为左心室辅助装置植入术后的晚期并发症，结肠动力线侵蚀。
J Cardiol Cases. 2023 Feb 9;27(5):226-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2023.02.001. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Decreasing driveline infections in patients supported on ventricular assist devices: a care pathway approach.降低心室辅助装置支持患者的导管相关感染：一种护理途径方法。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 May;11(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001815.
6
Effect of Ventricular Assist Device Self-care Simulation-Based Mastery Learning on Driveline Exit Site Infections: A Pilot Study.基于心室辅助装置自我护理模拟的精通学习对导线出口部位感染的影响：一项初步研究。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022;37(3):289-295. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000824.
7
Short-term Retention of Patient and Caregiver Ventricular Assist Device Self-care Skills after Simulation-based Mastery Learning.基于模拟的掌握学习后患者及护理人员心室辅助装置自我护理技能的短期保持情况
Clin Simul Nurs. 2021 Apr;53:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.01.004. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
8
Ventricular Assist Device-Specific Infections.心室辅助装置相关感染
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 25;10(3):453. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030453.
9
The Effect of Judge Selection on Standard Setting Using the Mastery Angoff Method during Development of a Ventricular Assist Device Self-Care Curriculum.心室辅助装置自我护理课程开发过程中，采用精通安格夫法时法官选择对标准设定的影响。
Clin Simul Nurs. 2019 Feb;27:39-47.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
10
Wound care of the driveline exit site in patients with a ventricular assist device: A systematic review.心室辅助装置患者驱动线出口部位的伤口护理：一项系统综述。
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2018 Apr 30;26(2):328-335. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.14982. eCollection 2018 Apr.
本文引用的文献
1
Importance of early appropriate intervention including antibiotics and wound care for device-related infection in patients with left ventricular assist device.早期适当干预（包括使用抗生素和伤口护理）对左心室辅助装置患者器械相关感染的重要性。
Transplant Proc. 2014 Apr;46(3):907-10. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.11.106.
2
Eradication of a chronic wound and driveline infection after redo-LVAD implantation.再次植入左心室辅助装置（LVAD）后慢性伤口及导线感染的根除
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar 31;9:63. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-63.
3
Driveline infections in left ventricular assist devices: implications for destination therapy.左心室辅助装置中的传动系统感染：对目的地治疗的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Nov;94(5):1381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.074. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
4
Continuous-flow devices and percutaneous site infections: clinical outcomes.连续流装置与经皮部位感染：临床结局。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Nov;31(11):1151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
5
A changing trend toward destination therapy: are we treating the same patients differently?向目标治疗转变的趋势：我们是否在对相同的患者进行不同的治疗？
Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38(5):552-4.
6
Double tunnel technique for the LVAD driveline: improved management regarding driveline infections.左心室辅助装置驱动线的双隧道技术：改善驱动线感染的管理
J Artif Organs. 2012 Mar;15(1):44-8. doi: 10.1007/s10047-011-0607-3. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
7
Left ventricular assist devices are underutilized.左心室辅助装置未得到充分利用。
Circulation. 2011 Apr 12;123(14):1552-8; discussion 1558. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.958991.
8
Infectious complications in patients with left ventricular assist device: etiology and outcomes in the continuous-flow era.左心室辅助装置患者的感染性并发症：连续流时代的病因和结局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Oct;90(4):1270-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.093.
9
Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.采用连续血流左心室辅助装置治疗晚期心力衰竭。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 3;361(23):2241-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909938. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
10
Drive-line exit-site infection in a patient with axial-flow pump support: successful management using vacuum-assisted therapy.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Sep;26(9):956-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.06.007.
Zotero 插件