van Strien Tatjana, Ouwens Machteld A, Engel Carmen, de Weerth Carolina
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, PO Box 9102, 6500 HC Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Free University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Appetite. 2014 Aug;79:124-33. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.020. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
Self-reported emotional eating has been found to significantly moderate distress-induced food intake, with low emotional eaters eating less after a stress task than after a control task and high emotional eaters eating more. The aim of the present study was to explore possible underlying mechanisms by assessing possible associations with (1) ability to experience the typical post-stress reduction of hunger and (2) inhibitory control. We studied these effects in 54 female students who were preselected on the basis of extremely high or low scores on an emotional eating questionnaire. Using a within subject design we measured the difference of actual food or snack intake after a control or a stress task (Trier Social Stress Test). As expected, the moderator effect of emotional eating on distress-induced food intake was found to be only present in females with a failure to report the typical reduction of hunger immediately after a stress task (an a-typical hunger stress response). Contrary to our expectations, this moderator effect of emotional eating was also found to be only present in females with high ability to stop motor impulses (high inhibitory control). These findings suggest that an a-typical hunger stress response but not poor inhibitory control may underlie the moderator effect of emotional eating on distress-induced food intake. However, inhibitory control may play a role whether or not there is a moderator effect of self-reported emotional eating on distress-induced food intake.
自我报告的情绪化进食已被发现能显著调节压力诱发的食物摄入量,情绪性进食较少者在应激任务后比在对照任务后进食更少,而情绪性进食较多者则进食更多。本研究的目的是通过评估与(1)经历应激后典型的饥饿感减轻的能力以及(2)抑制控制的可能关联,来探索潜在的机制。我们对54名女学生进行了研究,她们是根据情绪性进食问卷上极高或极低的分数预先挑选出来的。采用被试内设计,我们测量了对照任务或应激任务(特里尔社会应激测试)后实际食物或零食摄入量的差异。正如预期的那样,情绪性进食对压力诱发的食物摄入量的调节作用仅在应激任务后未能报告典型的饥饿感减轻的女性(非典型饥饿应激反应)中存在。与我们的预期相反,情绪性进食的这种调节作用也仅在有高能力停止运动冲动(高抑制控制)的女性中存在。这些发现表明,非典型饥饿应激反应而非抑制控制能力差可能是情绪性进食对压力诱发的食物摄入量调节作用的基础。然而,无论自我报告的情绪性进食对压力诱发的食物摄入量是否有调节作用,抑制控制都可能发挥作用。