Bose Prithviraj, Dai Yun, Grant Steven
Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Institute of Molecular Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Sep;143(3):323-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
Initially regarded as "epigenetic modifiers" acting predominantly through chromatin remodeling via histone acetylation, HDACIs, alternatively referred to as lysine deacetylase or simply deacetylase inhibitors, have since been recognized to exert multiple cytotoxic actions in cancer cells, often through acetylation of non-histone proteins. Some well-recognized mechanisms of HDACI lethality include, in addition to relaxation of DNA and de-repression of gene transcription, interference with chaperone protein function, free radical generation, induction of DNA damage, up-regulation of endogenous inhibitors of cell cycle progression, e.g., p21, and promotion of apoptosis. Intriguingly, this class of agents is relatively selective for transformed cells, at least in pre-clinical studies. In recent years, additional mechanisms of action of these agents have been uncovered. For example, HDACIs interfere with multiple DNA repair processes, as well as disrupt cell cycle checkpoints, critical to the maintenance of genomic integrity in the face of diverse genotoxic insults. Despite their pre-clinical potential, the clinical use of HDACIs remains restricted to certain subsets of T-cell lymphoma. Currently, it appears likely that the ultimate role of these agents will lie in rational combinations, only a few of which have been pursued in the clinic to date. This review focuses on relatively recently identified mechanisms of action of HDACIs, with particular emphasis on those that relate to the DNA damage response (DDR), and discusses synergistic strategies combining HDACIs with several novel targeted agents that disrupt the DDR or antagonize anti-apoptotic proteins that could have implications for the future use of HDACIs in patients with cancer.
HDACIs最初被视为“表观遗传修饰剂”,主要通过组蛋白乙酰化进行染色质重塑发挥作用,也被称为赖氨酸脱乙酰酶或简称为脱乙酰酶抑制剂,后来人们认识到它们在癌细胞中发挥多种细胞毒性作用,通常是通过非组蛋白的乙酰化。HDACIs致死的一些公认机制包括,除了使DNA松弛和解除基因转录抑制外,还包括干扰伴侣蛋白功能、产生自由基、诱导DNA损伤、上调细胞周期进程的内源性抑制剂(如p21)以及促进细胞凋亡。有趣的是,至少在临床前研究中,这类药物对转化细胞具有相对选择性。近年来,人们还发现了这些药物的其他作用机制。例如,HDACIs干扰多种DNA修复过程,以及破坏细胞周期检查点,这些对于面对各种基因毒性损伤时维持基因组完整性至关重要。尽管它们具有临床前潜力,但HDACIs的临床应用仍仅限于某些T细胞淋巴瘤亚组。目前,这些药物的最终作用可能在于合理联合使用,而迄今为止在临床上仅探索了少数几种联合方式。本综述重点关注HDACIs相对较新发现的作用机制,特别强调那些与DNA损伤反应(DDR)相关的机制,并讨论将HDACIs与几种新型靶向药物联合使用的协同策略,这些靶向药物可破坏DDR或拮抗抗凋亡蛋白,这可能对HDACIs未来在癌症患者中的应用具有重要意义。