Syed Moin, Juang Linda P
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2014 Apr;20(2):176-90. doi: 10.1037/a0035330.
The purpose of the present study was to test three fundamental theoretical propositions from Phinney's (1990) developmental model about the relations among ethnic identity, identity coherence, and psychological functioning: (a) ethnic identity is more strongly related to identity coherence for ethnic minorities than for Whites; (b) ethnic identity is more strongly related to psychological functioning for ethnic minorities than for Whites; and (c) identity coherence mediates the association between ethnic identity and psychological functioning for ethnic minorities, but not for Whites. These hypotheses were tested in three independent samples of ethnically diverse youth. In general, we found weak to moderate support for these three hypotheses, suggesting that the theoretically proposed differences in ethnic identity between ethnic minorities and Whites may not be supported by data. Implications for theory and measurement of ethnic identity are discussed.
本研究的目的是检验菲尼(1990)发展模型中关于族群认同、认同连贯性和心理功能之间关系的三个基本理论命题:(a)对于少数族裔而言,族群认同与认同连贯性的关系比白人更为紧密;(b)对于少数族裔而言,族群认同与心理功能的关系比白人更为紧密;(c)认同连贯性在少数族裔的族群认同与心理功能之间起中介作用,但在白人中不起中介作用。这些假设在三个不同族裔青年的独立样本中进行了检验。总体而言,我们发现这三个假设得到了微弱到中等程度的支持,这表明少数族裔和白人在族群认同上理论上提出的差异可能没有得到数据支持。文中还讨论了对族群认同理论和测量的启示。