Soliveres Santiago, Smit Christian, Maestre Fernando T
Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Departamento de Biología y Geología, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Calle Tulipán s/n, 28933, Móstoles, Spain.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015 Feb;90(1):297-313. doi: 10.1111/brv.12110. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
Once seen as anomalous, facilitative interactions among plants and their importance for community structure and functioning are now widely recognized. The growing body of modelling, descriptive and experimental studies on facilitation covers a wide variety of terrestrial and aquatic systems throughout the globe. However, the lack of a general body of theory linking facilitation among different types of organisms and biomes and their responses to environmental changes prevents further advances in our knowledge regarding the evolutionary and ecological implications of facilitation in plant communities. Moreover, insights gathered from alternative lines of inquiry may substantially improve our understanding of facilitation, but these have been largely neglected thus far. Despite over 15 years of research and debate on this topic, there is no consensus on the degree to which plant-plant interactions change predictably along environmental gradients (i.e. the stress-gradient hypothesis), and this hinders our ability to predict how plant-plant interactions may affect the response of plant communities to ongoing global environmental change. The existing controversies regarding the response of plant-plant interactions across environmental gradients can be reconciled when clearly considering and determining the species-specificity of the response, the functional or individual stress type, and the scale of interest (pairwise interactions or community-level response). Here, we introduce a theoretical framework to do this, supported by multiple lines of empirical evidence. We also discuss current gaps in our knowledge regarding how plant-plant interactions change along environmental gradients. These include the existence of thresholds in the amount of species-specific stress that a benefactor can alleviate, the linearity or non-linearity of the response of pairwise interactions across distance from the ecological optimum of the beneficiary, and the need to explore further how frequent interactions among multiple species are and how they change across different environments. We review the latest advances in these topics and provide new approaches to fill current gaps in our knowledge. We also apply our theoretical framework to advance our knowledge on the evolutionary aspects of plant facilitation, and the relative importance of facilitation, in comparison with other ecological processes, for maintaining ecosystem structure, functioning and dynamics. We build links between these topics and related fields, such as ecological restoration, woody encroachment, invasion ecology, ecological modelling and biodiversity-ecosystem-functioning relationships. By identifying commonalities and insights from alternative lines of research, we further advance our understanding of facilitation and provide testable hypotheses regarding the role of (positive) biotic interactions in the maintenance of biodiversity and the response of ecological communities to ongoing environmental changes.
植物间的促进性相互作用及其对群落结构和功能的重要性,曾经被视为异常现象,如今已得到广泛认可。关于促进作用的建模、描述性和实验性研究日益增多,涵盖了全球各种陆地和水生系统。然而,缺乏一个将不同类型生物和生物群落之间的促进作用及其对环境变化的响应联系起来的通用理论体系,阻碍了我们在植物群落促进作用的进化和生态影响方面的知识进一步发展。此外,从其他研究方向获得的见解可能会极大地增进我们对促进作用的理解,但迄今为止这些见解在很大程度上被忽视了。尽管在这个话题上已经进行了超过15年的研究和辩论,但对于植物 - 植物相互作用沿环境梯度的变化可预测程度(即胁迫梯度假说)仍未达成共识,这阻碍了我们预测植物 - 植物相互作用如何影响植物群落对当前全球环境变化的响应的能力。当明确考虑和确定响应的物种特异性、功能或个体胁迫类型以及感兴趣的尺度(成对相互作用或群落水平响应)时,关于植物 - 植物相互作用在环境梯度上的响应的现有争议可以得到调和。在此,我们引入一个理论框架来做到这一点,并辅以多条实证证据。我们还讨论了目前我们在植物 - 植物相互作用如何沿环境梯度变化方面的知识空白。这些空白包括受益者能够缓解的物种特异性胁迫量中阈值的存在、成对相互作用相对于受益者生态最优距离的响应的线性或非线性,以及需要进一步探索多个物种之间的相互作用频率如何以及它们在不同环境中如何变化。我们回顾了这些主题的最新进展,并提供了填补当前知识空白的新方法。我们还应用我们的理论框架来推进我们对植物促进作用进化方面的认识,以及促进作用与其他生态过程相比,在维持生态系统结构、功能和动态方面的相对重要性。我们在这些主题与相关领域之间建立联系,如生态恢复、木本植物入侵、入侵生态学、生态建模以及生物多样性 - 生态系统功能关系。通过识别来自其他研究方向的共性和见解,我们进一步增进了对促进作用的理解,并提供了关于(正)生物相互作用在维持生物多样性以及生态群落对当前环境变化的响应中作用的可检验假设。