Centre for Philosophical Psychology, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Apr;37(2):152-3. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13002124.
Huang & Bargh's (H&B's) definition of goals is ambiguous between "specific goals" - the end-state of a token action I am about to perform - and "unspecific goals" - the end-state of an action-type (without specifying how this would be achieved). The analogy with selfish genes pushes the authors towards the former interpretation, but the latter would provide a more robust theoretical framework.
黄和巴尔赫（H&B）的目标定义在“具体目标”——我即将执行的一个动作的终态——和“非具体目标”——一种动作类型的终态（而不指定如何实现这一点）之间是模糊的。与自私基因的类比使作者倾向于前者的解释，但后者将提供一个更强大的理论框架。
