D'Ercole Ann
Clinical Associate Professor of Psychology and a Supervisor at the New York University Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis, and is a Distinguished Visiting Faculty member at William Alanson White Institute, New York.
Psychoanal Q. 2014 Apr;83(2):249-79. doi: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2014.00091.x.
Close examination of Freud's Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality (1905a) reveals an ambiguity in Freud's language as he simultaneously tries to escape 19th-century psychiatric paradigms concerning sexuality and perversion while also retaining a normative approach to adult sexuality that created new categories of pathology. The result is an ambivalent legacy that has both hampered and helped contemporary clinicians as they deal with a diverse array of presentations of gender and sexual orientation in today's world.
仔细研读弗洛伊德的《性学三论》(1905年)会发现,弗洛伊德在语言上存在一种模糊性,他一方面试图摆脱19世纪关于性与变态的精神病学范式,另一方面又保留了一种对成人性行为的规范性方法,这种方法创造了新的病理学类别。其结果是留下了一种矛盾的遗产,在当代临床医生应对当今世界各种不同的性别和性取向表现时,既产生了阻碍,也提供了帮助。