Ferreira S C, de Almeida-Neto C, Nishiya A S, Oliveira C D L, Ferreira J E, Alencar C S, Levi J E, Salles N A, Mendrone A, Sabino E C
Infectious Diseases Division, Federal University of São Paulo; Department of Molecular Biology, Fundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo.
Transfus Med. 2014 Jun;24(3):169-75. doi: 10.1111/tme.12124. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
To identify the demographic characteristics, risk factors and motivations for donating among blood donors with reactive serologic tests for syphilis.
Post-donation interviews with syphilis seropositive blood donors improve recruitment and screening strategies.
This case-control study compares 75 Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) > 8, EIA+ (enzyme immunoassay) and FTA-ABS+ (fluorescent treponemal antibody); 80 VDRL-, EIA+ and FTA-ABS+; and 34 VDRL- and EIA- donors between 2004 and 2009. Donors were assessed by their demographic characteristics, sexual behaviour, history of alcohol and illicit drugs use, and motivations to donate.
Donors with VDRL > 8 were more likely to be divorced [AOR = 12·53; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·30-120·81], to have had more than six sexual partners (AOR=7·1; 95% CI 1·12-44·62) and to report male-male-sex in the past 12 months (AOR=8·18; 95% CI 1·78-37·60). Donors with VDRL-, EIA+ and FTA-ABS+ were less likely to be female (AOR=0·26; 95% CI 0·07-0·96), more likely to be older (AOR=10·2; 95% CI 2·45-42·58 ≥ 39 and <60 years old) and to have had more than six sexual partners in the past 12 months (AOR = 8·37; 95% CI 1·49-46·91). There was no significant difference among groups regarding illicit drugs use; 30·7% (VDRL > 8) and 12·5% (VDRL-, EIA+ and FTA-ABS+) of donors reported that they had been at risk for HIV infection (P = 0·004). One-third of donors came to the blood bank to help a friend or a relative who needed blood.
Although donors exposed to syphilis reported and recognised some high risk behaviour, most were motivated by direct appeal to donate blood. Monitoring the risk profile of blood donors can benefit public health and improve blood safety.
确定梅毒血清学检测呈反应性的献血者的人口统计学特征、危险因素及献血动机。
对梅毒血清学阳性献血者进行献血后访谈可改进招募和筛查策略。
本病例对照研究比较了2004年至2009年间75名性病研究实验室(VDRL)检测值>8、酶免疫测定(EIA)阳性和荧光密螺旋体抗体吸收试验(FTA-ABS)阳性的献血者;80名VDRL阴性、EIA阳性和FTA-ABS阳性的献血者;以及34名VDRL阴性和EIA阴性的献血者。通过人口统计学特征、性行为、酒精和非法药物使用史以及献血动机对献血者进行评估。
VDRL检测值>8的献血者更可能离异[比值比(AOR)=12.53;95%置信区间(CI)1.30 - 120.81],有超过6个性伴侣(AOR = 7.1;95% CI 1.12 - 44.62),并报告在过去12个月中有男男性行为(AOR = 8.18;95% CI 1.78 - 37.60)。VDRL阴性、EIA阳性和FTA-ABS阳性的献血者女性比例较低(AOR = 0.26;95% CI 0.07 - 0.96),年龄较大的可能性更高(AOR = 10.2;95% CI 2.45 - 42.58,年龄≥39岁且<60岁),且在过去12个月中有超过6个性伴侣(AOR = 8.37;95% CI 1.49 - 46.91)。各组在非法药物使用方面无显著差异;30.7%(VDRL检测值>8)和12.5%(VDRL阴性、EIA阳性和FTA-ABS阳性)的献血者报告他们有感染HIV的风险(P = 0.004)。三分之一的献血者到血库是为了帮助需要用血的朋友或亲戚。
尽管接触过梅毒的献血者报告并认识到一些高风险行为,但大多数人是受直接呼吁献血的影响。监测献血者的风险状况有助于公共卫生并提高血液安全性。