• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Determinants of coverage decisions in health insurance marketplaces: consumers' decision-making abilities and the amount of information in their choice environment.医疗保险市场中覆盖范围决策的决定因素:消费者的决策能力及其选择环境中的信息量。
Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb;50(1):58-80. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12181. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
2
Can Plan Recommendations Improve the Coverage Decisions of Vulnerable Populations in Health Insurance Marketplaces?《计划建议能否改善医疗保险市场中弱势群体的覆盖决策?》
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 30;11(3):e0151095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151095. eCollection 2016.
3
What states are doing to simplify health plan choice in the insurance marketplaces.各州在保险市场中为简化健康计划选择所采取的措施。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2013 Dec;34:1-13.
4
Tobacco use and health insurance literacy among vulnerable populations: implications for health reform.弱势群体中的烟草使用与健康保险素养:对医疗改革的影响
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):729. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2680-7.
5
Stakeholders' perceptions of ways to support decisions about health insurance marketplace enrollment: a qualitative study.利益相关者对支持医疗保险市场参保决策方式的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1890-8.
6
Are Americans finding affordable coverage in the health insurance marketplaces? Results from the Commonwealth Fund Affordable Care Act Tracking Survey.美国人在医疗保险市场上能找到负担得起的保险范围吗?联邦基金《平价医疗法案》跟踪调查结果。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2014 Sep;25:1-15.
7
Decision-Making Experiences Of Consumers Choosing Individual-Market Health Insurance Plans.消费者选择个体医疗保险计划的决策体验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):464-472. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05036.
8
Moving Beyond Blind Men and Elephants: Providing Total Estimated Annual Costs Improves Health Insurance Decision Making.超越盲人摸象:提供年度总成本估算可改善医疗保险决策。
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Oct;74(5):625-635. doi: 10.1177/1077558716669210. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
9
A Randomized Trial Examining Three Strategies for Supporting Health Insurance Decisions among the Uninsured.一项针对三种帮助未参保者做出医疗保险决策策略的随机试验。
Med Decis Making. 2016 Oct;36(7):911-22. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15578635. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
10
Shopping on the Public and Private Health Insurance Marketplaces: Consumer Decision Aids and Plan Presentation.在公共和私人医疗保险市场购物:消费者决策辅助工具和计划介绍。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1400-1410. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4483-x. Epub 2018 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
INFORMATION GAPS AND HEALTH INSURANCE ENROLLMENT: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act Navigator Programs.信息差距与医疗保险参保:来自《平价医疗法案》导航项目的证据。
Am J Health Econ. 2022 Fall;8(4):477-505. doi: 10.1086/721569. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
2
The role of health insurance literacy in the process and outcomes of choosing a health insurance policy in the Netherlands.医疗保险知识在荷兰选择医疗保险政策过程和结果中的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):1002. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09960-0.
3
A Description of Personal Health Information Management Work With a Spotlight on the Practices of Older Adults: Qualitative e-Delphi Study With Professional Organizers.个人健康信息管理工作描述——以老年人群体的实践为重点:与专业组织者合作的定性电子德尔菲研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 31;25:e42330. doi: 10.2196/42330.
4
The Swiss Health Insurance Literacy Measure (HILM-CH): Measurement Properties and Cross-Cultural Validation.瑞士健康保险素养量表(HILM-CH):测量特性和跨文化验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 26;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08986-0.
5
Association of Funding Cuts to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Navigator Program With Privately Sponsored Television Advertising.《与平价医疗法案(Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act)顾问计划资金削减相关联的私人赞助电视广告》
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2224651. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.24651.
6
Health Insurance Literacy Perceptions and the Needs of a Working-Class Community.健康保险知识认知与工人阶级群体的需求。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Jan 4;6(2):e62-e69. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220309-01. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
7
Predicting Future Utilization Using Self-Reported Health and Health Conditions in a Longitudinal Cohort Study: Implications for Health Insurance Decision Support.使用纵向队列研究中的自我报告健康状况和健康状况预测未来的使用情况:对健康保险决策支持的影响。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211064118. doi: 10.1177/00469580211064118.
8
Patient administrative burden in the US health care system.美国医疗体系中的患者行政负担。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56(5):755-765. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13861. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
9
Informed Decision-making for Health Insurance Enrollment: Survey Study.健康保险参保的知情决策:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Aug 12;5(8):e27477. doi: 10.2196/27477.
10
Significant Disparities Exist in Consumer Health Insurance Literacy: Implications for Health Care Reform.消费者健康保险素养存在显著差异:对医疗保健改革的影响。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Nov 5;3(4):e250-e258. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190923-01. eCollection 2019 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolving Choice Inconsistencies in Choice of Prescription Drug Insurance.处方药保险选择中不断演变的选择不一致性。
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Aug;106(8):2145-2184. doi: 10.1257/aer.20130778.
2
Opioid abuse in the United States and Department of Health and Human Services actions to address opioid-drug-related overdoses and deaths.美国的阿片类药物滥用情况以及美国卫生与公众服务部为应对与阿片类药物相关的过量用药和死亡所采取的行动。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015 Jun;29(2):133-9. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2015.1037530.
3
The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter?统计中介分析中间接效应推断检验的相对可信度:方法真的重要吗?
Psychol Sci. 2013 Oct;24(10):1918-27. doi: 10.1177/0956797613480187. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
4
Consumers' misunderstanding of health insurance.消费者对健康保险的误解。
J Health Econ. 2013 Sep;32(5):850-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
5
Enrollment in prescription drug insurance: the interaction of numeracy and choice set size.参保处方药保险:计算能力与选择集大小的相互作用。
Health Psychol. 2014 Apr;33(4):340-8. doi: 10.1037/a0032738. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
6
Choice architecture is a better strategy than engaging patients to spur behavior change.选择架构优于让患者参与来激发行为改变。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):242-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1075.
7
The vast majority of Medicare Part D beneficiaries still don't choose the cheapest plans that meet their medication needs.绝大多数 Medicare Part D 受益人的药物需求仍未得到满足,他们没有选择最廉价的计划。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Oct;31(10):2259-65. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0087.
8
One fish, two fish, red fish, blue fish: effects of price frames, brand names, and choice set size on Medicare Part D insurance plan decisions.一鱼,二鱼,红鱼,蓝鱼:价格框架、品牌名称和选择集大小对医疗保险 D 部分保险计划决策的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2012 Aug;69(4):460-73. doi: 10.1177/1077558711435365. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
9
Choosing the right medicare prescription drug plan: the effect of age, strategy selection, and choice set size.选择合适的医疗保险处方药计划:年龄、策略选择和选择集大小的影响。
Health Psychol. 2011 Nov;30(6):719-27. doi: 10.1037/a0023951. Epub 2011 May 23.
10
Numeracy and Medicare Part D: the importance of choice and literacy for numbers in optimizing decision making for Medicare's prescription drug program.算数能力和医疗保险处方药部分 D:在优化医疗保险处方药计划决策过程中,对数字的选择和读写能力的重要性。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Jun;26(2):295-307. doi: 10.1037/a0022028.

医疗保险市场中覆盖范围决策的决定因素:消费者的决策能力及其选择环境中的信息量。

Determinants of coverage decisions in health insurance marketplaces: consumers' decision-making abilities and the amount of information in their choice environment.

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, 830 E Main St, 4th Floor, Richmond, VA, 23298.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb;50(1):58-80. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12181. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12181
PMID:24779769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4319871/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the determinants and quality of coverage decisions among uninsured choosing plans in a hypothetical health insurance marketplace.

STUDY SETTING

Two samples of uninsured individuals: one from an Internet-based sample comprised largely of young, healthy, tech-savvy individuals (n = 276), and the other from low-income, rural Virginians (n = 161).

STUDY DESIGN

We assessed whether health insurance comprehension, numeracy, choice consistency, and the number of plan choices were associated with participants' ability to choose a cost-minimizing plan, given their expected health care needs (defined as choosing a plan costing no more than $500 in excess of the total estimated annual costs of the cheapest plan available).

DATA COLLECTION

Primary data were collected using an online questionnaire.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Uninsured who were more numerate showed higher health insurance comprehension; those with more health insurance comprehension made choices of health insurance plans more consistent with their stated preferences; and those who made choices more concordant with their stated preferences were less likely to choose a plan that cost more than $500 in excess of the cheapest plan available.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing health insurance comprehension and designing exchanges to facilitate plan comparison will be critical to ensuring the success of health insurance marketplaces.

摘要

目的

调查在假设的医疗保险市场中,选择保险计划的未参保者的决定因素和保险覆盖范围质量。

研究地点

两个无保险个体样本:一个来自基于互联网的样本,主要由年轻、健康、精通技术的个体组成(n=276),另一个来自弗吉尼亚州低收入、农村地区(n=161)。

研究设计

我们评估了健康保险理解能力、计算能力、选择一致性以及计划选择数量是否与参与者根据其预期医疗需求(定义为选择成本不超过最便宜计划总成本 500 美元以上的计划)选择成本最小化计划的能力相关。

数据收集

主要数据通过在线问卷收集。

主要发现

计算能力较高的未参保者表现出更高的健康保险理解能力;那些健康保险理解能力较高的人做出的健康保险计划选择与他们的明确偏好更一致;而那些做出更符合其明确偏好的选择的人不太可能选择成本超过最便宜计划总成本 500 美元以上的计划。

结论

提高健康保险理解能力和设计便利计划比较的交易所对于确保医疗保险市场的成功至关重要。