• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

处方药保险选择中不断演变的选择不一致性。

Evolving Choice Inconsistencies in Choice of Prescription Drug Insurance.

作者信息

Abaluck Jason, Gruber Jonathan

机构信息

Yale SOM and NBER, Yale School of Management -Economics, 227 Church Street Apt 10H New Haven, CT 06510.

MIT and NBER, MIT Department of Economics, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Bldg. E52-434, Cambridge, MA 02139.

出版信息

Am Econ Rev. 2016 Aug;106(8):2145-2184. doi: 10.1257/aer.20130778.

DOI:10.1257/aer.20130778
PMID:29104294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5665392/
Abstract

We study choice over prescription insurance plans by the elderly using government administrative data to evaluate how these choices evolve over time. We find large "foregone savings" from not choosing the lowest cost plan that has grown over time. We develop a structural framework to decompose the changes in "foregone welfare" from inconsistent choices into choice set changes and choice function changes from a fixed choice set. We find that foregone welfare increases over time due primarily to changes in plan characteristics such as premiums and out-of-pocket costs; we estimate little learning at either the individual or cohort level.

摘要

我们利用政府行政数据研究老年人对处方药保险计划的选择,以评估这些选择如何随时间演变。我们发现,不选择成本最低的计划会带来大量“放弃的储蓄”,且这一情况随时间有所增加。我们构建了一个结构框架,将因选择不一致导致的“放弃的福利”变化分解为选择集变化和来自固定选择集的选择函数变化。我们发现,放弃的福利随时间增加主要是由于保费和自付费用等计划特征的变化;我们估计在个体或群体层面几乎没有学习效应。

相似文献

1
Evolving Choice Inconsistencies in Choice of Prescription Drug Insurance.处方药保险选择中不断演变的选择不一致性。
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Aug;106(8):2145-2184. doi: 10.1257/aer.20130778.
2
Choice Inconsistencies Among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program.老年人的选择不一致性:来自医疗保险处方药计划中计划选择的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2011 Jun 1;101(4):1180-1210. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.4.1180.
3
Heterogeneity in Choice Inconsistencies Among the Elderly: Evidence from Prescription Drug Plan Choice.老年人选择不一致中的异质性:来自处方药计划选择的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2011 May;101(3):377-381. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.3.377.
4
Paying Attention or Paying Too Much in Medicare Part D.注意 Medicare 部分 D 或过分注意 Medicare 部分 D
Am Econ Rev. 2015 Jan;105(1):204-33. doi: 10.1257/aer.20120651.
5
Choice Inconsistencies among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program: Comment.老年人的选择不一致性:来自医疗保险处方药计划中计划选择的证据:评论。
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;106(12):3932-61. doi: 10.1257/aer.20131048.
6
Choice Inconsistencies among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program: Reply.老年人的选择不一致性:来自医疗保险处方药计划选择的证据:回复。
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;106(12):3962-87.
7
Choice set size and decision making: the case of Medicare Part D prescription drug plans.选择集大小与决策:以医疗保险处方药计划为例。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):582-93. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09357793. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
8
PDP or MA-PD? Medicare part D enrollment decisions in CMS Region 25.PDP 还是 MA-PD?CMS 第 25 区的医疗保险部分 D 注册决策。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):130-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.04.002.
9
The role of satisfaction and switching costs in Medicare Part D choices.满意度和转换成本在医疗保险D部分选择中的作用。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Mar-Apr;10(2):398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
10
Medicare Part D and Portfolio Choice.医疗保险处方药部分和投资组合选择。
Am Econ Rev. 2016 May;106(5):339-42. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20161125.

引用本文的文献

1
Medicare Resource Use Differs by English Reading Proficiency.医疗保险资源使用因英语阅读能力而异。
Innov Aging. 2024 Dec 9;9(1):igae105. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae105. eCollection 2025.
2
Physician Perspectives on Implementation of Real-Time Benefit Tools: A Qualitative Study.医生视角下实时获益工具的实施情况:一项定性研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Oct;13(5):1070-1078. doi: 10.1055/a-1947-2674. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
3
Association of Health Insurance Literacy With Enrollment in Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Plan Characteristics Within Medicare Advantage.健康保险素养与传统医疗保险、医疗保险优势计划和医疗保险优势计划内计划特征的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46792.
4
When Should There Be Vertical Choice in Health Insurance Markets?健康保险市场何时应存在纵向选择?
Am Econ Rev. 2022 Jan;112(1):304-342. doi: 10.1257/aer.20201073.
5
Personalized Telephone Outreach Increased Health Insurance Take-Up For Hard-To-Reach Populations, But Challenges Remain.个性化电话外呼提高了难以覆盖人群的医疗保险参保率,但仍存在挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Jan;41(1):129-137. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01000.
6
Accuracy of Physician Estimates of Out-of-Pocket Costs for Medication Filling.医生对药物配药自付费用估计的准确性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133188. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33188.
7
Claims-based algorithms for common chronic conditions were efficiently constructed using machine learning methods.基于索赔的常见慢性病算法是使用机器学习方法高效构建的。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 27;16(9):e0254394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254394. eCollection 2021.
8
Mortality Effects and Choice Across Private Health Insurance Plans.私人医疗保险计划中的死亡率影响与选择
Q J Econ. 2021 Aug;136(3):1557-1610. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjab017. Epub 2021 May 6.
9
Plan Switching and Stickiness in Medicare Advantage: A Qualitative Interview With Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.医疗保险优势计划中的转换和粘性:对医疗保险优势计划受益人的定性访谈。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Dec;78(6):693-702. doi: 10.1177/1077558720944284. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
10
Subsidy Design in Privately Provided Social Insurance: Lessons from Medicare Part D.私人提供的社会保险中的补贴设计:来自医疗保险D部分的经验教训。
J Polit Econ. 2020 May;128(5):1712-1752. doi: 10.1086/705550. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare Part D: Are Insurers Gaming the Low Income Subsidy Design?医疗保险 Part D:保险公司是否在玩弄低收入补贴设计?
Am Econ Rev. 2015 Apr;105(4):1547-80. doi: 10.1257/aer.20130903.
2
Adverse Selection and Inertia in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts.医疗保险市场中的逆向选择和惯性:当推动反而有害。
Am Econ Rev. 2013 Dec;103(7):2643-82. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.7.2643.
3
Sinking, Swimming, or Learning to Swim in Medicare Part D.在医疗保险 D 部分中下沉、游泳或学习游泳。
Am Econ Rev. 2012 Oct;102(6):2639-73. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.6.2639.
4
Plan selection in Medicare Part D: evidence from administrative data.医疗保险D部分的计划选择:来自行政数据的证据
J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;32(6):1325-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.06.006.
5
Comparison friction: experimental evidence from medicare drug plans.比较摩擦:来自医疗保险药品计划的实验证据。
Q J Econ. 2012;127(1):199-235. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr055.
6
Choice Inconsistencies Among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program.老年人的选择不一致性:来自医疗保险处方药计划中计划选择的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2011 Jun 1;101(4):1180-1210. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.4.1180.
7
Who failed to enroll in Medicare Part D, and why? Early results.哪些人未能加入医疗保险D部分,原因是什么?初步结果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Sep-Oct;25(5):w344-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w344. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
8
Persistence in the choice of health plans.对健康计划选择的坚持。
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1985;6:47-72.