• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息差距与医疗保险参保:来自《平价医疗法案》导航项目的证据。

INFORMATION GAPS AND HEALTH INSURANCE ENROLLMENT: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act Navigator Programs.

作者信息

Myerson Rebecca, Li Honglin

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

Am J Health Econ. 2022 Fall;8(4):477-505. doi: 10.1086/721569. Epub 2022 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1086/721569
PMID:38264440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10805367/
Abstract

We studied the impact of Affordable Care Act navigator programs on health insurance coverage, using the 80 percent cut in program funding under the Trump administration as a natural experiment. Our study design exploited county-level differences in the program prior to funding cuts. We did not find that cuts to the program significantly decreased rates of marketplace coverage or any health insurance coverage by 2019; however, our estimates could not rule out marketplace coverage declines of up to 2.7 percent (point estimate -1.3 percent, 95 percent CI: 2.7 percent to 0.1 percent), or total coverage declines of up to 1.8 percentage points (point estimate -0.8 percentage points or -1.2 percent, 95 percent CI: -1.8 to 0.2). Cuts to the navigator program significantly decreased marketplace coverage and total coverage among lower-income adults, and significantly decreased total coverage among adults under age 45, Hispanic adults, and adults who speak a language other than English at home. We found no significant impact of the cuts on Medicaid enrollment (95 percent CI: -1.9 percentage points to 0.5 percentage points); most uninsured people in the states we studied lived in locations that had not implemented Medicaid eligibility expansions. These findings suggest that before the funding cuts, navigators were helping underserved consumers obtain coverage.

摘要

我们利用特朗普政府时期该项目资金削减80%这一自然实验,研究了《平价医疗法案》导航项目对医疗保险覆盖范围的影响。我们的研究设计利用了资金削减前该项目在县级层面的差异。我们发现,到2019年,该项目的削减并没有显著降低市场覆盖率或任何医疗保险覆盖率;然而,我们的估计不能排除市场覆盖率下降高达2.7%(点估计为-1.3%,95%置信区间:2.7%至0.1%),或总覆盖率下降高达1.8个百分点(点估计为-0.8个百分点或-1.2%,95%置信区间:-1.8至0.2)。导航项目的削减显著降低了低收入成年人的市场覆盖率和总覆盖率,也显著降低了45岁以下成年人、西班牙裔成年人以及在家说英语以外语言的成年人的总覆盖率。我们发现削减对医疗补助登记没有显著影响(95%置信区间:-1.9个百分点至0.5个百分点);在我们研究的州,大多数未参保人员居住在尚未实施医疗补助资格扩大政策的地区。这些发现表明,在资金削减之前,导航员正在帮助服务不足的消费者获得保险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ae/10805367/9f398e996fb9/nihms-1864932-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ae/10805367/ab2734294f0d/nihms-1864932-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ae/10805367/f37e5d508812/nihms-1864932-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ae/10805367/9f398e996fb9/nihms-1864932-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ae/10805367/ab2734294f0d/nihms-1864932-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ae/10805367/f37e5d508812/nihms-1864932-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ae/10805367/9f398e996fb9/nihms-1864932-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
INFORMATION GAPS AND HEALTH INSURANCE ENROLLMENT: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act Navigator Programs.信息差距与医疗保险参保:来自《平价医疗法案》导航项目的证据。
Am J Health Econ. 2022 Fall;8(4):477-505. doi: 10.1086/721569. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
2
Association of Funding Cuts to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Navigator Program With Privately Sponsored Television Advertising.《与平价医疗法案(Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act)顾问计划资金削减相关联的私人赞助电视广告》
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2224651. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.24651.
3
Comparison of Income Eligibility for Medicaid vs Marketplace Coverage for Insurance Enrollment Among Low-Income US Adults.比较美国低收入成年人通过医疗补助和市场交易获得医疗保险的收入资格。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 14;2(6):e210771. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0771. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Association of Medicaid vs Marketplace Eligibility on Maternal Coverage and Access With Prenatal and Postpartum Care.医疗补助与市场合格性对产妇保险和医疗服务获取的影响:产前和产后护理。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2137383. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37383.
5
Changes in Self-reported Insurance Coverage, Access to Care, and Health Under the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案下的自报告保险覆盖范围、获得医疗服务的机会和健康状况的变化。
JAMA. 2015 Jul 28;314(4):366-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8421.
6
Uninsurance among children whose parents are losing Medicaid coverage: Results from a statewide survey of Oregon families.父母正在失去医疗补助覆盖的儿童中的未参保情况:俄勒冈州家庭全州范围调查结果
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 2):401-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00764.x.
7
Following the ACA Repeal-and-Replace Effort, Where Does the U.S. Stand on Insurance Coverage? Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Affordable Care Act Tracking Survey, March--June 2017.在《平价医疗法案》废除与替代努力之后,美国在医保覆盖方面处于何种状况?来自英联邦基金会《平价医疗法案》追踪调查的结果,2017年3月至6月
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2017 Sep;2017:1-21.
8
Financial Instability of Federal Navigator Program Challenges Organizations to Help Uninsured Enroll in Health Insurance Coverage.联邦导航员计划的财务不稳定给各组织带来挑战,要求其帮助未参保人员参保。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(3):1555-1568. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0129.
9
Personalized Telephone Outreach Increased Health Insurance Take-Up For Hard-To-Reach Populations, But Challenges Remain.个性化电话外呼提高了难以覆盖人群的医疗保险参保率,但仍存在挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Jan;41(1):129-137. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01000.
10
Assessment of Churn in Coverage Among California's Health Insurance Marketplace Enrollees.评估加州医疗保险市场参保者的保险覆盖流失情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Dec 2;3(12):e224484. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.4484.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Characteristics of Adults Unable to Complete Medicaid Renewal During the Unwinding Period.在医保覆盖范围缩减期间无法完成医疗补助续保的成年人的健康特征。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Mar 7;6(3):e250092. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0092.
2
Safety Net Program Participation Patterns, Sociodemographic Factors, and Health.安全网项目参与模式、社会人口因素与健康。
Am J Prev Med. 2025 May;68(5):964-973. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.01.027. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
3
Association of Funding Cuts to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Navigator Program With Privately Sponsored Television Advertising.

本文引用的文献

1
When All That Glitters Is Gold: Dominated Plan Choice on Covered California for the 2018 Plan Year.当所有的闪光都是金子:2018 计划年度加州保险交易所的主导计划选择。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):1059-1087. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12518. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
2
Using Email And Letters To Reduce Choice Errors Among ACA Marketplace Enrollees.使用电子邮件和信件减少 ACA 市场参与者的选择错误。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 May;40(5):812-819. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.02099.
3
Terminating Cost-Sharing Reduction Subsidy Payments: The Impact Of Marketplace Zero-Dollar Premium Plans On Enrollment.
《与平价医疗法案(Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act)顾问计划资金削减相关联的私人赞助电视广告》
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2224651. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.24651.
终止成本分担削减补贴支付:市场零保费计划对参保的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):41-49. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00345.
4
The Trump Effect: Postinauguration Changes in Marketplace Enrollment.特朗普效应:就职典礼后市场参保人数的变化。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2019 Oct 1;44(5):715-736. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7611623.
5
Decision-Making Experiences Of Consumers Choosing Individual-Market Health Insurance Plans.消费者选择个体医疗保险计划的决策体验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):464-472. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05036.
6
Machine-Based Expert Recommendations And Insurance Choices Among Medicare Part D Enrollees.基于机器的专家建议和医疗保险计划 D 参保人员的保险选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):482-490. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05017.
7
Poor Consumer Comprehension and Plan Selection Inconsistencies Under the 2016 HealthCare.gov Choice Architecture.2016年医保市场选择架构下消费者理解不足与计划选择不一致的问题
MDM Policy Pract. 2017 Jan-Jun;2(1). doi: 10.1177/2381468317716441. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
8
Health Insurance for "Humans": Information Frictions, Plan Choice, and Consumer Welfare.医疗保险“人”:信息摩擦、计划选择和消费者福利。
Am Econ Rev. 2015 Aug;105(8):2449-500. doi: 10.1257/aer.20131126.
9
Adverse Selection and Inertia in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts.医疗保险市场中的逆向选择和惯性:当推动反而有害。
Am Econ Rev. 2013 Dec;103(7):2643-82. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.7.2643.
10
The Questionable Value of Having a Choice of Levels of Health Insurance Coverage.健康保险覆盖范围多层次选择的可疑价值
J Econ Perspect. 2017;31(4):51-72. doi: 10.1257/jep.31.4.51.