• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同种植体-基台连接方式对螺钉连接稳定性的影响。

The effect of different implant-abutment connections on screw joint stability.

作者信息

Michalakis Konstantinos X, Calvani Pasquale Lino, Muftu Sinan, Pissiotis Argiris, Hirayama Hiroshi

机构信息

1 Division of Graduate and Postgraduate Prosthodontics, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Mass.

出版信息

J Oral Implantol. 2014 Apr;40(2):146-52. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00032.

DOI:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00032
PMID:24779947
Abstract

Dental implants with an internal connection have been designed to establish a better stress distribution when lateral external forces act on the prosthesis and minimize the forces transmitted to the fastening screw. In the present study, 10 externally and 10 internally hexed implants were tested with a compressive force applied with an Instron Universal machine. Four cycles of loading-unloading were applied to each specimen to achieve displacements of 0.5, 1, 2, and 2.5 mm. The mean loads for the first cycle were 256.70 N for the external connection and 256 N for the internal connection implants. The independent t test did not reveal any significant differences among the 2 tested groups (P = .780). For the second cycle, the mean loads needed for a displacement of 1 mm were 818.19 N and 780.20 N for the external connection and the internal connection implants, respectively. The independent t test revealed significant differences among the 2 tested groups (P < .001). In the third cycle, the mean load values for a 2-mm displacement were 1394.10 N and 1225.00 N. The independent t test revealed significant differences among the 2 tested groups (P < .001). The mean loads for the fourth cycle were 1488.00 N for the external connection and 1029.00 N for the internal connection implants. These loads were required for a displacement of 2.5 mm. The independent t test revealed significant differences among the 2 tested groups (P < .001). The results of this in vitro study suggest that the internal connection design of the examined implant system could not prevent screw loosening during overloading. No implant or prosthesis failure was noticed in either group.

摘要

具有内部连接的牙种植体旨在当侧向外力作用于假体时建立更好的应力分布,并使传递到紧固螺钉的力最小化。在本研究中,使用英斯特朗万能材料试验机对10个外六角和10个内六角种植体施加压缩力进行测试。对每个样本施加四个加载-卸载循环,以实现0.5、1、2和2.5毫米的位移。外部连接种植体在第一个循环中的平均载荷为256.70牛,内部连接种植体为256牛。独立t检验未显示两个测试组之间有任何显著差异(P = 0.780)。在第二个循环中,外部连接和内部连接种植体实现1毫米位移所需的平均载荷分别为818.19牛和780.20牛。独立t检验显示两个测试组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。在第三个循环中,2毫米位移的平均载荷值分别为1394.10牛和1225.00牛。独立t检验显示两个测试组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。第四个循环中外部连接种植体的平均载荷为1488.00牛,内部连接种植体为1029.00牛。这些载荷是实现2.5毫米位移所需的。独立t检验显示两个测试组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。这项体外研究的结果表明,所检查的种植体系统的内部连接设计在过载期间无法防止螺钉松动。两组均未发现种植体或假体失败。

相似文献

1
The effect of different implant-abutment connections on screw joint stability.不同种植体-基台连接方式对螺钉连接稳定性的影响。
J Oral Implantol. 2014 Apr;40(2):146-52. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00032.
2
Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.种植体连接方式及修复设计(螺丝固位与粘结固位)对前牙冠修复体可靠性及失败模式的影响
Eur J Oral Sci. 2011 Aug;119(4):323-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00837.x.
3
In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.体外研究连接类型对内连接和外连接氧化锆基台的骨折负荷的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):850-8.
4
An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.对具有两种基台设计和三种不同固位螺钉合金的锥形种植体系统进行体外负荷评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):733-7.
5
Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.牙种植体-基台界面的动态疲劳特性:大直径与标准直径六面体型种植体的关节开口情况
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):599-607. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115250.
6
Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.钛和氧化锆基台的抗折能力:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 May;109(5):304-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60306-6.
7
The effect of provisional restoration type on micromovement of implants.临时修复类型对种植体微动的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Sep;100(3):173-82. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60176-6.
8
Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.外连接与内连接种植体-基台的光弹应力分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Oct;106(4):266-71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60128-5.
9
Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.轴向壁修改对粘结固位、种植体支持的冠的保留的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Feb;107(2):80-5. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60028-6.
10
Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.在静态咬合负荷下,对种植体支持的单冠修复体上通用铸造体传递至长基牙的应力进行光弹性分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Nov;23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182597c09.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel Esthetic Technique for Restoring Dental Implant Access Holes: A Case Report.用于修复牙种植体接入孔的新型美学技术:病例报告
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jan 26;13(2):53. doi: 10.3390/dj13020053.
2
Dental Implant Abutment Screw Loss: Presentation of 10 Cases.牙种植体基台螺钉松动:10例病例报告
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Apr 9;15(4):96. doi: 10.3390/jfb15040096.
3
Implant-Abutment Misfit after Cyclic Loading: An In Vitro Experimental Study.循环加载后种植体-基台不匹配:一项体外实验研究。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 3;15(15):5341. doi: 10.3390/ma15155341.
4
Rotational tolerances of a titanium abutment in the as-received condition and after screw tightening in a conical implant connection.在锥形种植体连接中,钛基台在初始状态以及拧紧螺丝后的旋转公差。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2021 Dec;13(6):343-350. doi: 10.4047/jap.2021.13.6.343. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
5
Analysis of Torque Maintenance and Fracture Resistance after Fatigue in Retention Screws Made of Different Metals for Screw-Retained Implant-Borne Prosthesis Joints.用于螺丝固位种植体支持式修复体连接的不同金属固位螺丝疲劳后扭矩保持和抗断裂性分析
Int J Dent. 2021 Nov 18;2021:9693239. doi: 10.1155/2021/9693239. eCollection 2021.
6
Mechanical analysis of prosthetic bars and dental implants in 3 and 4 implant-supported overdenture protocols using finite element analysis.使用有限元分析对采用3种植体和4种植体支持的覆盖义齿修复方案中的修复杆和牙种植体进行力学分析。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021 Jul-Sep;11(3):438-441. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 15.
7
Cytotoxic effects of submicron- and nano-scale titanium debris released from dental implants: an integrative review.从牙科植入物释放的亚微米和纳米级钛颗粒的细胞毒性作用:综合评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):1627-1640. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03785-z. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
Biological Responses to the Transitional Area of Dental Implants: Material- and Structure-Dependent Responses of Peri-Implant Tissue to Abutments.牙种植体过渡区的生物学反应:种植体周围组织对基台的材料和结构依赖性反应
Materials (Basel). 2019 Dec 22;13(1):72. doi: 10.3390/ma13010072.
9
In Vitro Effects of Cyclic Dislodgement on Retentive Properties of Various Titanium-Based Dental Implant Overdentures Attachment System.循环脱位对各种钛基覆盖义齿附着系统固位性能的体外影响
Materials (Basel). 2019 Nov 16;12(22):3770. doi: 10.3390/ma12223770.
10
A Comparative 3D Finite Element Computational Study of Three Connections.三种连接方式的三维有限元对比计算研究
Materials (Basel). 2019 Sep 26;12(19):3135. doi: 10.3390/ma12193135.