• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外连接与内连接种植体-基台的光弹应力分析。

Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.

机构信息

Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Oct;106(4):266-71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60128-5.

DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60128-5
PMID:21962585
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Common complications of implant restorations are abutment screw loosening and screw fracture. The geometry of the implant-abutment connection may affect stresses generated from loading, and these stresses may have a role in screw loosening or fracture.

PURPOSE

This study compared the load transfer characteristics of a complete-arch restoration supported by 4 implants with external and internal implant-abutment connections. Loads were applied to the prostheses in 3 positions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two-dimensional photoelastic models were used to simulate bone. Two types of implants (ReplaceSelect Internal-Interface Tapered Implants and ReplaceSelect External-Interface Tapered Implants) were placed in the photoelastic models. Complete-arch metal frameworks were fabricated on the abutments. Artificial teeth were arranged on the framework, and the prosthesis was screwed onto the abutments. The specimens were analyzed at 2 levels (implant-abutment level and apical to the implant level) with 3 loading conditions (4-point load; 2-point anterior load; and 2-point lateral load). The numbers of fringe orders were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

With the 4-point load, no stress differences occurred between the external-implant abutment connection and internal-implant abutment connection at the connection level and at the apical level. With the 2-point anterior load, the internal-implant abutment connection resulted in lower stresses at the connection level both in the loaded and non-loaded areas. With the 2-point lateral load, the internal-implant abutment connection resulted in lower stresses at the connection level at the non-loaded area.

CONCLUSIONS

When loaded off-center, the internal-implant abutment connection produced less stress when compared with the external-implant abutment connection.

摘要

问题陈述

种植体修复的常见并发症是基台螺丝松动和螺丝断裂。种植体-基台连接的几何形状可能会影响加载产生的应力,这些应力可能在螺丝松动或断裂中起作用。

目的

本研究比较了 4 个种植体支持的全弓修复体的外部和内部种植体-基台连接的负载传递特性。将负载施加到修复体的 3 个位置。

材料和方法

使用二维光弹模型模拟骨。将两种类型的种植体(ReplaceSelect Internal-Interface Tapered Implants 和 ReplaceSelect External-Interface Tapered Implants)放置在光弹模型中。在基台上制作全弓金属框架。在框架上排列人工牙齿,然后将修复体拧到基台上。在 2 个水平(种植体-基台水平和种植体根尖水平)和 3 个加载条件(四点加载;两点前加载;和两点侧向加载)下分析标本。记录和比较条纹数。

结果

四点加载时,连接水平和根尖水平的外部种植体-基台连接和内部种植体-基台连接之间没有产生应力差异。两点前加载时,内部种植体-基台连接在加载和未加载区域的连接水平上产生的应力较低。两点侧向加载时,内部种植体-基台连接在未加载区域的连接水平上产生的应力较低。

结论

当加载偏心时,与外部种植体-基台连接相比,内部种植体-基台连接产生的应力较小。

相似文献

1
Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.外连接与内连接种植体-基台的光弹应力分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Oct;106(4):266-71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60128-5.
2
A strain gauge analysis comparing external and internal implant-abutment connections.一项比较外部和内部种植体-基台连接的应变片分析。
Implant Dent. 2014 Apr;23(2):206-11. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000063.
3
Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.牙种植体-基台界面的动态疲劳特性:大直径与标准直径六面体型种植体的关节开口情况
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):599-607. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115250.
4
Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.带有分段式和非分段式基台的种植体-牙齿连接修复体的光弹性应力分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 May;89(5):495-502. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00167-7.
5
The dynamic natures of implant loading.种植体加载的动态特性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Jun;101(6):359-71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60079-2.
6
Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.种植体支持式修复体的循环加载:部件贴合度随时间的变化。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr;89(4):346-51. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.71.
7
Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis.内外六方平台转换种植体-基台连接的生物力学评估:体外实验室和三维有限元分析。
Dent Mater. 2012 Oct;28(10):e218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
8
Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.锥形种植体-基台连接的负载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):797-806.
9
Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.种植体连接方式及修复设计(螺丝固位与粘结固位)对前牙冠修复体可靠性及失败模式的影响
Eur J Oral Sci. 2011 Aug;119(4):323-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00837.x.
10
Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.种植体支持修复体的循环加载:当将循环使用的基台替换为成品基台时,修复体与基台界面间隙的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jan;95(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Microgap Size and Microbial Microleakage at the Implant Fixture-Abutment Interface in Original and Compatible Abutments.种植体基台与原配基台和适配基台界面处微间隙大小及微生物微渗漏的评估。
Biomed Res Int. 2025 Jul 9;2025:2530986. doi: 10.1155/bmri/2530986. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of the influence of connection configuration on the implant-abutment interface vertical misfit of original milled titanium and laser-sintered cobalt-chromium abutments.评估连接配置对原始铣削钛基台和激光烧结钴铬基台的种植体-基台界面垂直不匹配的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 22;29(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06093-4.
3
Effect of polishing process on torque loss ratio and microgap of selective laser melting abutment: an in vitro study.
抛光工艺对选择性激光熔化基台扭矩损失率和微间隙的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):1055. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04829-y.
4
A finite element analysis study on different angle correction designs for inclined implants in All-On-Four protocol.不同角度修正设计对 All-On-Four 方案中倾斜种植体的有限元分析研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04091-2.
5
Influence of the Use of Transepithelial Abutments vs. Titanium Base Abutments on Microgap Formation at the Dental Implant-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study.经上皮基台与钛基台的使用对牙种植体-基台界面微间隙形成的影响:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 1;16(19):6532. doi: 10.3390/ma16196532.
6
The cumulative survival rate of dental implants with micro-threads: a long-term retrospective study.微螺纹牙种植体的累积生存率:一项长期回顾性研究。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024 Feb;54(1):53-62. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2203240162. Epub 2023 May 30.
7
Biomechanical efficiency of different implant-abutment connection: a systematic review of studies using photoelastic stress analysis.不同种植体-基台连接的生物力学效率:使用光弹应力分析的研究系统评价。
Evid Based Dent. 2023 Jun;24(2):92. doi: 10.1038/s41432-023-00884-6. Epub 2023 May 15.
8
Photoelasticity for Stress Concentration Analysis in Dentistry and Medicine.用于牙科和医学中应力集中分析的光弹性
Materials (Basel). 2022 Sep 30;15(19):6819. doi: 10.3390/ma15196819.
9
Effect of crown-to-implant ratio and crown height space on marginal bone stress: a finite element analysis.冠-种植体比例和冠高度空间对边缘骨应力的影响:有限元分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Sep 1;7(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00368-1.
10
Bone turnover markers to assess jawbone quality prior to dental implant treatment: a case-control study.在种植牙治疗前使用骨转换标志物评估颌骨质量:一项病例对照研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Nov 3;6(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00264-0.