Scoboria Alan, Boucher Chantal, Mazzoni Giuliana
a Department of Psychology , University of Windsor , Windsor , ON , Canada.
Memory. 2015;23(4):545-62. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.910530. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
Previous studies have shown that many people hold personal memories for events that they no longer believe occurred. This study examines the reasons that people provide for choosing to reduce autobiographical belief in vividly recollected autobiographical memories. A body of non-believed memories provided by 374 individuals was reviewed to develop a qualitatively derived categorisation system. The final scheme consisted of 8 major categories (in descending order of mention): social feedback, event plausibility, alternative attributions, general memory beliefs, internal event features, consistency with external evidence, views of self/others, personal motivation and numerous sub-categories. Independent raters coded the reports and judged the primary reason that each person provided for withdrawing belief. The nature of each category, frequency of category endorsement, category overlap and phenomenological ratings are presented, following which links to related literature and implications are discussed. This study documents that a wide variety of recollective and non-recollective sources of information influence decision-making about the occurrence of autobiographical events.
先前的研究表明,许多人对他们不再相信发生过的事件持有个人记忆。本研究探讨了人们选择降低对生动回忆起的自传体记忆的自传体信念的原因。对374个人提供的一系列不被相信的记忆进行了审查,以建立一个定性推导的分类系统。最终方案包括8个主要类别(按提及频率降序排列):社会反馈、事件可信度、替代归因、一般记忆信念、内部事件特征、与外部证据的一致性、自我/他人观点、个人动机以及众多子类别。独立评分者对报告进行编码,并判断每个人放弃信念的主要原因。呈现了每个类别的性质、类别认可频率、类别重叠和现象学评级,随后讨论了与相关文献的联系及影响。本研究证明,各种各样的回忆性和非回忆性信息来源会影响关于自传体事件发生的决策。