Kerber Kevin A, Zahuranec Darin B, Brown Devin L, Meurer William J, Burke James F, Smith Melinda A, Lisabeth Lynda D, Fendrick A Mark, McLaughlin Thomas, Morgenstern Lewis B
Department of Neurology University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Stroke Program, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ann Neurol. 2014 Jun;75(6):899-907. doi: 10.1002/ana.24172. Epub 2014 May 26.
Acute stroke is a serious concern in emergency department (ED) dizziness presentations. Prior studies, however, suggest that stroke is actually an unlikely cause of these presentations. Lacking are data on short- and long-term follow-up from population-based studies to establish stroke risk after presumed nonstroke ED dizziness presentations.
From May 8, 2011 to May 7, 2012, patients ≥45 years of age presenting to EDs in Nueces County, Texas, with dizziness, vertigo, or imbalance were identified, excluding those with stroke as the initial diagnosis. Stroke events after the ED presentation up to October 2, 2012 were determined using the BASIC (Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi) study, which uses rigorous surveillance and neurologist validation. Cumulative stroke risk was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
A total of 1,245 patients were followed for a median of 347 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 230-436 days). Median age was 61.9 years (IQR = 53.8-74.0 years). After the ED visit, 15 patients (1.2%) had a stroke. Stroke risk was 0.48% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.22-1.07%) at 2 days, 0.48% (95% CI = 0.22-1.07%) at 7 days, 0.56% (95% CI = 0.27-1.18%) at 30 days, 0.56% (95% CI = 0.27-1.18%) at 90 days, and 1.42% (95% CI = 0.85-2.36%) at 12 months.
Using rigorous case ascertainment and outcome assessment in a population-based design, we found that the risk of stroke after presumed nonstroke ED dizziness presentations is very low, supporting a nonstroke etiology to the overwhelming majority of original events. High-risk subgroups likely exist, however, because most of the 90-day stroke risk occurred within 2 days. Vascular risk stratification was insufficient to identify these cases.
急性中风是急诊科(ED)头晕症状患者的一个严重关切问题。然而,既往研究表明中风实际上不太可能是这些症状的病因。缺乏基于人群研究的短期和长期随访数据来确定假定非中风性ED头晕症状后的中风风险。
从2011年5月8日至2012年5月7日,确定德克萨斯州努埃塞斯县急诊科中年龄≥45岁、出现头晕、眩晕或失衡症状的患者,排除初始诊断为中风的患者。使用BASIC(科珀斯克里斯蒂脑卒中超视监测)研究确定ED就诊后至2012年10月2日的中风事件,该研究采用严格监测并经神经科医生验证。使用Kaplan-Meier估计值计算累积中风风险。
共对1245例患者进行了随访,中位随访时间为347天(四分位间距[IQR]=230 - 436天)。中位年龄为61.9岁(IQR=53.8 - 74.0岁)。ED就诊后,15例患者(1.2%)发生中风。2天时中风风险为0.48%(95%置信区间[CI]=0.22 - 1.07%),7天时为0.48%(95%CI=0.22 - 1.07%),30天时为0.56%(95%CI=0.27 - 1.18%),90天时为0.56%(95%CI=0.27 - 1.18%),12个月时为1.42%(95%CI=0.85 -