Suppr超能文献

分离性身份障碍:实证综述。

Dissociative identity disorder: An empirical overview.

作者信息

Dorahy Martin J, Brand Bethany L, Sar Vedat, Krüger Christa, Stavropoulos Pam, Martínez-Taboas Alfonso, Lewis-Fernández Roberto, Middleton Warwick

机构信息

1Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 May;48(5):402-17. doi: 10.1177/0004867414527523.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite its long and auspicious place in the history of psychiatry, dissociative identity disorder (DID) has been associated with controversy. This paper aims to examine the empirical data related to DID and outline the contextual challenges to its scientific investigation.

METHODS

The overview is limited to DID-specific research in which one or more of the following conditions are met: (i) a sample of participants with DID was systematically investigated, (ii) psychometrically-sound measures were utilised, (iii) comparisons were made with other samples, (iv) DID was differentiated from other disorders, including other dissociative disorders, (v) extraneous variables were controlled or (vi) DID diagnosis was confirmed. Following an examination of challenges to research, data are organised around the validity and phenomenology of DID, its aetiology and epidemiology, the neurobiological and cognitive correlates of the disorder, and finally its treatment.

RESULTS

DID was found to be a complex yet valid disorder across a range of markers. It can be accurately discriminated from other disorders, especially when structured diagnostic interviews assess identity alterations and amnesia. DID is aetiologically associated with a complex combination of developmental and cultural factors, including severe childhood relational trauma. The prevalence of DID appears highest in emergency psychiatric settings and affects approximately 1% of the general population. Psychobiological studies are beginning to identify clear correlates of DID associated with diverse brain areas and cognitive functions. They are also providing an understanding of the potential metacognitive origins of amnesia. Phase-oriented empirically-guided treatments are emerging for DID.

CONCLUSIONS

The empirical literature on DID is accumulating, although some areas remain under-investigated. Existing data show DID as a complex, valid and not uncommon disorder, associated with developmental and cultural variables, that is amenable to psychotherapeutic intervention.

摘要

目的

尽管分离性身份障碍(DID)在精神病学史上有着悠久且重要的地位,但一直存在争议。本文旨在研究与DID相关的实证数据,并概述其科学研究面临的背景挑战。

方法

本综述仅限于满足以下一项或多项条件的DID专项研究:(i)对患有DID的参与者样本进行系统调查;(ii)使用心理测量学上可靠的测量方法;(iii)与其他样本进行比较;(iv)将DID与其他障碍区分开来,包括其他分离性障碍;(v)控制无关变量;(vi)确认DID诊断。在审视研究面临的挑战后,数据围绕DID的有效性和现象学、病因学和流行病学、该障碍的神经生物学和认知相关性以及最终的治疗进行组织。

结果

研究发现DID在一系列指标上是一种复杂但有效的障碍。它可以与其他障碍准确区分,尤其是在结构化诊断访谈评估身份改变和遗忘时。DID在病因上与发育和文化因素的复杂组合相关,包括严重的童年关系创伤。DID的患病率在急诊精神病学环境中似乎最高,约影响1%的普通人群。心理生物学研究开始确定与DID相关的明确关联,这些关联与不同的脑区和认知功能有关。它们还为遗忘的潜在元认知起源提供了理解。针对DID的以阶段为导向的实证指导治疗正在出现。

结论

关于DID的实证文献正在积累,尽管有些领域仍研究不足。现有数据表明DID是一种复杂、有效且并不罕见的障碍,与发育和文化变量相关,适合进行心理治疗干预。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验