de Araújo Aurigena Antunes, de Araújo Dantas Diego, do Nascimento Gemma Galgani, Ribeiro Susana Barbosa, Chaves Katarina Melo, de Lima Silva Vanessa, de Araújo Raimundo Fernandes, de Souza Dyego Leandro Bezerra, de Medeiros Caroline Addison Carvalho Xavier
Department of Biophysical and Pharmacology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil,
Psychiatr Q. 2014 Sep;85(3):357-67. doi: 10.1007/s11126-014-9290-x.
This cross-sectional study compared the effects of treatment with atypical antipsychotic drugs on quality of life (QoL) and side effects in 218 patients with schizophrenia attending the ambulatory services of psychiatric in Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Socio-economic variables were compared. The five-dimension EuroQoL (EQ-5D) was used to evaluate QoL, and side effects were assessed using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser (UKU) Side Effect Rating Scale and the Simpson-Angus Scale. Data were analysed using the χ (2) test and Student's t test, with a significance level of 5 %. Average monthly household incomes in the medication groups were 1.1-2.1 minimum wages ($339-$678). UKU Scale scores showed significant differences in side effects, mainly, clozapine, quetiapine and ziprasidone (p < 0.05). EQ-5D scores showed that all drugs except olanzapine significantly impacted mobility (p < 0.05), and proportions of individuals reporting problems in other dimensions were high: 63.6 % of clozapine users reported mobility problems, 63.7 and 56.3 % of clozapine and ziprasidone users, respectively, had difficulties with usual activities, 68.8 and 54.5 % of ziprasidone and clozapine users, respectively, experienced pain and/or discomfort, and 72.8 % of clozapine users reported anxiety and/or depression. Psychiatric, neurological, and autonomous adverse effects, as well as other side effects, were prevalent in users of atypical antipsychotic drugs, especially clozapine and ziprasidone. Olanzapine had the least side effects. QoL was impacted by side effects and economic conditions in all groups. Thus, the effects of these antipsychotic agents appear to have been masked by aggravating social and economic situations.
这项横断面研究比较了非典型抗精神病药物治疗对巴西北里奥格兰德州精神病门诊服务的218例精神分裂症患者生活质量(QoL)和副作用的影响。对社会经济变量进行了比较。采用五维度欧洲生活质量量表(EQ-5D)评估生活质量,并使用临床检查不良反应量表(UKU)和辛普森-安格斯量表评估副作用。使用χ²检验和学生t检验分析数据,显著性水平为5%。用药组的月平均家庭收入为1.1 - 2.1最低工资(339 - 678美元)。UKU量表评分显示副作用存在显著差异,主要是氯氮平、喹硫平和齐拉西酮(p < 0.05)。EQ-5D评分显示,除奥氮平外,所有药物对活动能力均有显著影响(p < 0.05),报告其他维度问题的个体比例较高:63.6%的氯氮平使用者报告有活动能力问题,氯氮平和齐拉西酮使用者分别有63.7%和56.3%在日常活动方面有困难,齐拉西酮和氯氮平使用者分别有68.8%和54.5%经历疼痛和/或不适,72.8%的氯氮平使用者报告有焦虑和/或抑郁。非典型抗精神病药物使用者中普遍存在精神、神经和自主神经不良反应以及其他副作用,尤其是氯氮平和齐拉西酮。奥氮平的副作用最少。所有组的生活质量均受到副作用和经济状况的影响。因此,这些抗精神病药物的效果似乎被恶化的社会和经济状况所掩盖。