• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高山顶植被的时空功能变化是由灌木和草本植物的增加驱动的。

Spatial and temporal functional changes in alpine summit vegetation are driven by increases in shrubs and graminoids.

机构信息

School of Environment, Environmental Futures Centre, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia.

出版信息

AoB Plants. 2014 Mar 26;6(0). doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plu008. Print 2014.

DOI:10.1093/aobpla/plu008
PMID:24790129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4038439/
Abstract

Classical approaches to investigating temporal and spatial changes in community composition offer only partial insight into the ecology that drives species distribution, community patterns and processes, whereas a functional approach can help to determine many of the underlying mechanisms that drive such patterns. Here, we aim to bring these two approaches together to understand such drivers, using an elevation gradient of sites, a repeat species survey and species functional traits. We used data from a repeat vegetation survey on five alpine summits and measured plant height, leaf area, leaf dry matter content and specific leaf area (SLA) for every species recorded in the surveys. We combined species abundances with trait values to produce a community trait-weighted mean (CTWM) for each trait, and then combined survey results with the CTWMs. Across the gradient of summits, more favourable conditions for plant growth (warmer, longer growing season) occurred at the lower elevations. Vegetation composition changes between 2004 and 2011 (according to non-metric multi-dimensional scaling ordination) were strongly affected by the high and increasing abundance of species with high SLA at high elevations. Species life-form categories strongly affected compositional changes and functional composition, with increasing dominance of tall shrubs and graminoids at the lower-elevation summits, and an overall increase in graminoids across the gradient. The CTWM for plant height and leaf dry matter content significantly decreased with elevation, whereas for leaf area and SLA it significantly increased. The significant relationships between CTWM and elevation may suggest specific ecological processes, namely plant competition and local productivity, influencing vegetation preferentially across the elevation gradient, with the dominance of shrubs and graminoids driving the patterns in the CTWMs.

摘要

经典的方法只能部分地揭示驱动物种分布、群落格局和过程的生态因素,而功能方法可以帮助确定许多驱动这些模式的潜在机制。在这里,我们旨在将这两种方法结合起来,以了解这些驱动因素,使用海拔梯度的地点、重复的物种调查和物种功能特征。我们使用了来自五个高山山顶的重复植被调查的数据,并测量了在调查中记录的每一种植物的株高、叶面积、叶干物质含量和比叶面积(SLA)。我们将物种丰度与特征值结合起来,为每个特征生成一个群落特征加权平均值(CTWM),然后将调查结果与 CTWMs 结合起来。在山顶的梯度上,较高的海拔地区具有更有利于植物生长的条件(更温暖、更长的生长季节)。2004 年至 2011 年间(根据非度量多维标度排序)的植被组成变化受到高海拔地区高 SLA 物种高丰度的强烈影响。物种生活型分类强烈影响着组成变化和功能组成,随着低海拔山顶上高灌木和禾本科植物的优势地位增加,以及整个梯度上禾本科植物的总体增加。植物高度和叶干物质含量的 CTWM 随海拔显著降低,而叶面积和 SLA 的 CTWM 随海拔显著升高。CTWM 与海拔之间的显著关系可能表明,特定的生态过程,即植物竞争和局部生产力,优先影响整个海拔梯度上的植被,而灌木和禾本科植物的优势地位则驱动了 CTWM 中的模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c32/4038439/50ee015e13e1/plu00803.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c32/4038439/5b087d76c4d4/plu00801.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c32/4038439/07a6c0a8916a/plu00802.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c32/4038439/50ee015e13e1/plu00803.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c32/4038439/5b087d76c4d4/plu00801.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c32/4038439/07a6c0a8916a/plu00802.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c32/4038439/50ee015e13e1/plu00803.jpg

相似文献

1
Spatial and temporal functional changes in alpine summit vegetation are driven by increases in shrubs and graminoids.高山顶植被的时空功能变化是由灌木和草本植物的增加驱动的。
AoB Plants. 2014 Mar 26;6(0). doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plu008. Print 2014.
2
Leaf functional traits vary among growth forms and vegetation zones in the Himalaya.喜马拉雅山的不同生长形式和植被带的叶功能特性存在差异。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 1;906:167274. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167274. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
3
Functional composition and diversity of leaf traits in subalpine versus alpine vegetation in the Apennines.亚平宁山脉亚高山与高山植被中叶性状的功能组成与多样性
AoB Plants. 2020 Mar 26;12(2):plaa004. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plaa004. eCollection 2020 Apr.
4
Recent changes in high-mountain plant community functional composition in contrasting climate regimes.高海拔植物群落功能组成在不同气候条件下的近期变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 10;829:154541. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154541. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
5
Size and Reproductive Traits Rather than Leaf Economic Traits Explain Plant-Community Composition in Species-Rich Annual Vegetation along a Gradient of Land Use Intensity.在土地利用强度梯度上,物种丰富的一年生植被中,决定植物群落组成的是大小和繁殖性状而非叶片经济性状。
Front Plant Sci. 2017 May 29;8:891. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00891. eCollection 2017.
6
Early Evidence of Shifts in Alpine Summit Vegetation: A Case Study From Kashmir Himalaya.高山山顶植被变化的早期证据:以克什米尔喜马拉雅地区为例
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Apr 24;11:421. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00421. eCollection 2020.
7
Intraspecific trait variability shapes leaf trait response to altered fire regimes.种内性状变异性塑造了叶片性状对改变的火干扰的响应。
Ann Bot. 2021 Mar 24;127(4):543-552. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa179.
8
Vegetation trends over eleven years on mountain summits in NW Argentina.阿根廷西北部山顶十一年来的植被变化趋势
Ecol Evol. 2018 Nov 14;8(23):11554-11567. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4602. eCollection 2018 Dec.
9
Direct and indirect facilitation affect community productivity through changes in functional diversity in an alpine system.直接和间接促进作用通过改变高寒系统的功能多样性来影响群落生产力。
Ann Bot. 2021 Jan 7;127(2):241-249. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa170.
10
Drivers of plant diversity, community composition, functional traits, and soil processes along an alpine gradient in the central Chilean Andes.智利安第斯山脉中部沿高山梯度的植物多样性、群落组成、功能性状及土壤过程的驱动因素
Ecol Evol. 2024 Feb 9;14(2):e10888. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10888. eCollection 2024 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
AusTraits, a curated plant trait database for the Australian flora.AusTraits,一个经过精心整理的澳大利亚植物区系植物性状数据库。
Sci Data. 2021 Sep 30;8(1):254. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-01006-6.
2
Germination at Extreme Temperatures: Implications for Alpine Shrub Encroachment.极端温度下的萌发:对高山灌木入侵的影响
Plants (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;10(2):327. doi: 10.3390/plants10020327.
3
Functional composition and diversity of leaf traits in subalpine versus alpine vegetation in the Apennines.亚平宁山脉亚高山与高山植被中叶性状的功能组成与多样性

本文引用的文献

1
Variation in timing and abundance of flowering by Delphinium barbeyi Huth (Ranunculaceae): the roles of snowpack, frost, and La Niña, in the context of climate change.巴氏翠雀花(毛茛科)开花时间和数量的变化:在气候变化背景下,积雪、霜冻和拉尼娜现象的作用。
Oecologia. 2002 Feb;130(4):543-550. doi: 10.1007/s00442-001-0835-y. Epub 2002 Feb 1.
2
Foundation species influence trait-based community assembly.基础物种影响基于特征的群落组装。
New Phytol. 2012 Nov;196(3):824-834. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04306.x. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
3
Positive interactions in communities.
AoB Plants. 2020 Mar 26;12(2):plaa004. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plaa004. eCollection 2020 Apr.
4
Traditional plant functional groups explain variation in economic but not size-related traits across the tundra biome.传统植物功能群解释了整个苔原生物群落中经济性状而非与大小相关性状的变化。
Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2019 Jan;28(2):78-95. doi: 10.1111/geb.12783. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
5
Vegetation trends over eleven years on mountain summits in NW Argentina.阿根廷西北部山顶十一年来的植被变化趋势
Ecol Evol. 2018 Nov 14;8(23):11554-11567. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4602. eCollection 2018 Dec.
6
Changes in composition, ecology and structure of high-mountain vegetation: a re-visitation study over 42 years.高山植被的组成、生态与结构变化:一项跨越42年的再研究
AoB Plants. 2016 Jan 27;8:plw004. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plw004.
7
Endemic shrubs in temperate arid and semiarid regions of northern China and their potentials for rangeland restoration.中国北方温带干旱和半干旱地区的乡土灌木及其在牧场恢复中的潜力。
AoB Plants. 2015 Jun 3;7:plv063. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv063.
社区中的积极互动。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 May;9(5):191-3. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90088-4. Epub 2003 Nov 7.
4
New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology.功能生态学中多方面框架的新型多维功能多样性指数。
Ecology. 2008 Aug;89(8):2290-301. doi: 10.1890/07-1206.1.
5
Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward.功能多样性:回归基础并展望未来。
Ecol Lett. 2006 Jun;9(6):741-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00924.x.
6
Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits.基于功能性状重建群落生态学。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Apr;21(4):178-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
7
Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits.基于功能性状的陆地植物生态学
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 May;21(5):261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.004. Epub 2006 Feb 24.
8
Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data.直观推断:置信区间以及如何解读数据图表
Am Psychol. 2005 Feb-Mar;60(2):170-80. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.170.
9
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum.全球叶片经济谱
Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):821-7. doi: 10.1038/nature02403.
10
Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress.高山植物之间的积极相互作用会随着压力增加。
Nature. 2002 Jun 20;417(6891):844-8. doi: 10.1038/nature00812.