Tazuma Susumu, Igarashi Yoshinori, Inui Kazuo, Ohara Hirotaka, Tsuyuguchi Toshio, Ryozawa Shomei
Department of General Internal Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Medical Science, Programs of Applied Medicine, Clinical Pharmacotherapy, Hiroshima, Japan,
J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;50(2):221-9. doi: 10.1007/s00535-014-0960-0. Epub 2014 May 3.
We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous doripenem (DRPM) in patients with biliary tract infection requiring biliary drainage in comparison with imipenem/cilastatin (IPM/CS).
After the initial collection of bile, patients were randomly assigned by the registration system of the Clinical Research Organization to receive intravenous drip infusion of DRPM 0.5 g or IPM/CS 0.5 g three times daily in a randomized, open-label manner.
A total of 127 patients were enrolled in the trial (DRPM 62, IPM/CS 65). The characteristics of the 122 patients evaluated for efficacy were well balanced, except for the percentage of patients previously receiving antimicrobials, which was higher in the DRPM group than in the IPM/CS group. The clinical response rate was not significantly different between the DRPM group (93.1 %, 54/58 patients) and the IPM/CS group (93.8 %, 60/64). Non-inferiority assessment using confidence intervals demonstrated the non-inferiority of DRPM-IPM/CS. The incidence of adverse events, for which a causal relationship with either treatment was not ruled out, was 3.3 % (2/60) in the DRPM group and 3.1 % (2/65) in the IPM/CS group, and none was serious.
The clinical efficacy of DRPM in treating moderate or severe biliary tract infection requiring drainage was comparable to that of IPM/CS. DRPM was associated with no serious adverse events and a low incidence of adverse events. The results of this trial demonstrate that DRPM is a useful therapeutic option for moderate or severe biliary tract infection.
我们开展了一项随机对照试验,旨在评估静脉注射多利培南(DRPM)对比亚胺培南/西司他丁(IPM/CS)用于需要进行胆汁引流的胆道感染患者的临床疗效和安全性。
在首次采集胆汁后,患者通过临床研究组织的登记系统被随机分配,以随机、开放标签的方式接受每日三次静脉滴注0.5g DRPM或0.5g IPM/CS。
共有127例患者纳入试验(DRPM组62例,IPM/CS组65例)。122例接受疗效评估的患者的特征均衡良好,但DRPM组既往接受抗菌药物治疗的患者比例高于IPM/CS组。DRPM组(93.1%,54/58例患者)和IPM/CS组(93.8%,60/64例患者)的临床缓解率无显著差异。使用置信区间进行的非劣效性评估表明DRPM不劣于IPM/CS。DRPM组未排除与任何一种治疗存在因果关系的不良事件发生率为3.3%(2/60),IPM/CS组为3.1%(2/65),且均无严重不良事件。
DRPM治疗需要引流的中度或重度胆道感染的临床疗效与IPM/CS相当。DRPM未出现严重不良事件,不良事件发生率较低。本试验结果表明,DRPM是治疗中度或重度胆道感染的一种有效治疗选择。