Corna Laurie M
Department of Social Science, Health and Medicine & Institute of Gerontology, School of Social Science and Public Policy, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
Adv Life Course Res. 2013 Jun;18(2):150-9. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
Social scientists and public health researchers have long known that social position is related to health and that socioeconomic inequalities in health persist in later life. Increasingly, a life course perspective is adopted to understand the socioeconomic position (SEP)-health dynamic. This paper critically reviews the conceptual perspectives underlying empirical research seeking to better understand socioeconomic inequalities in health in the context of the life course. I comment on the contributions of this work, but also its limitations. In particular, I note the emphasis on understanding the mechanisms linking SEP to health, to the exclusion of research on the institutional and structural factors associated with socioeconomic inequalities over the life course. I also critique the relative absence of gender in this work, and how, by not linking individual experiences to the social policy contexts that shape resources and opportunities, the proximal, rather than the structural or institutional determinants of health are emphasized. I suggest that moving forward, a return to some of the key tenets of life course theory, including contributions from the comparative welfare states literature, may better inform life course analyses of socioeconomic inequalities in health. Specific suggestions for life scholarship are discussed.
社会科学家和公共卫生研究人员早就知道社会地位与健康有关,而且健康方面的社会经济不平等在晚年依然存在。越来越多的人采用生命历程视角来理解社会经济地位(SEP)与健康之间的动态关系。本文批判性地回顾了实证研究背后的概念性观点,这些研究旨在在生命历程的背景下更好地理解健康方面的社会经济不平等。我对这项工作的贡献以及局限性进行了评论。特别是,我注意到研究重点在于理解将SEP与健康联系起来的机制,却忽略了对与生命历程中社会经济不平等相关的制度和结构因素的研究。我还批评了这项工作中相对缺乏对性别的考量,以及由于没有将个人经历与塑造资源和机会的社会政策背景联系起来,从而强调了健康的近端决定因素,而非结构或制度决定因素。我建议,展望未来,回归生命历程理论的一些关键原则,包括比较福利国家文献的贡献,可能会为健康方面社会经济不平等的生命历程分析提供更好的信息。文中讨论了对生命历程研究的具体建议。